GrowSFDemocracy Through Data

SF Charter Amendments

Since 1996 • 153 measures • 153 shown

2024

November
  • Prop C - Inspector GeneralPassedNotable
    11/5/2024
    Yes: 60.94% No: 39.06%

    Establishes an Inspector General to investigate fraud, waste, abuse, expands subpoena/search warrant authority, renames Sheriff's Inspector General.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 240549
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Chan; Dorsey; Engardio; Mandelman; Melgar; Peskin; Preston; Ronen; Safaí; Stefani; Walton
    • Noes: None
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City amend the Charter to create the new position of Inspector General in the Controller’s Office to review and investigate complaints of fraud, waste, and abuse, and give the Controller’s Office additional powers to issue subpoenas and execute search warrants when permitted by State law?
    Summary

    Establishes an Inspector General within the San Francisco Controller's Office to investigate fraud, waste, or abuse, expands the Controller's subpoena and search warrant authority, and renames the existing Office of Inspector General to the Office of Sheriff's Inspector General.

    Description

    Establishes an Inspector General within the San Francisco Controller's Office, nominated by the Controller and approved by the Mayor and Board of Supervisors, to initiate and lead investigations into potential violations of laws or policies involving fraud, waste, or abuse across City operations. This amendment also expands the Controller's authority to issue subpoenas to third parties, including City contractors, permittees, and lobbyists, and authorizes the Controller's Office to execute search warrants to the extent permitted by State law. Furthermore, it renames the existing Office of Inspector General that investigates matters involving Sheriff's Office employees to the Office of Sheriff's Inspector General.

  • Prop D - City Commissions and Mayoral AuthorityFailed
    11/5/2024
    Yes: 43.33% No: 56.67%

    Limit City commissions to 65, grant Mayor sole authority for department heads, and give Police Chief rule-making authority.

    Origin: Signatures
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City amend the Charter to limit the total number of commissions the City may have to 65, retaining certain decision-making commissions and dissolving the others unless the Board of Supervisors instead continues any as advisory bodies; give the Mayor sole authority to appoint and remove City department heads; and give the Police Chief sole authority to adopt rules governing police officers’ conduct?
  • Prop E - Creating a Taskforce to Recommend Changing, Eliminating, or Combining City CommissionsPassedNotable
    11/5/2024
    Yes: 52.92% No: 47.08%

    Establishes a Commission Streamlining Task Force recommending modifications, eliminations, or consolidations of city boards and commissions.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 240547
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Chan; Mandelman; Peskin; Preston; Ronen; Safaí; Walton
    • Noes: Dorsey; Engardio; Melgar; Stefani
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City amend the Charter to create a Task Force with authority to make recommendations by February 1, 2026, on ways the City could change, eliminate, or consolidate commissions to improve the administration of City government; require a financial report on the City’s commissions; and give the Task Force authority to introduce ordinances to implement its recommendations, and if required provide for the City Attorney to draft Charter amendments to submit to voters at a future election?
    Summary

    Establishes a Commission Streamlining Task Force in San Francisco to recommend modifications, eliminations, or consolidations of the City's appointive boards and commissions, with recommendations due by February 1, 2026, and the entire section expiring on January 31, 2027.

    Description

    Establishes a Commission Streamlining Task Force in San Francisco by February 1, 2025, composed of five members including city officials and external experts, to recommend modifications, eliminations, or consolidations of the City's appointive boards and commissions for improved government administration. The amendment requires the Budget and Legislative Analyst to report on the financial impact of these bodies, mandates the Task Force to submit its recommendations by February 1, 2026, and directs the City Attorney to draft a Charter Amendment for Charter-established commissions based on these findings. Furthermore, it grants the Task Force authority to introduce ordinances for Municipal Code-codified commissions, which will take effect in 90 days unless rejected by a two-thirds vote of the Board of Supervisors, with the entire Section 4.100.1 expiring on January 31, 2027.

  • Prop F - Police Staffing and Deferred RetirementFailed
    11/5/2024
    Yes: 45.30% No: 54.70%

    Defines sworn officer, revises police staffing criteria, changes report frequency, and re-establishes police DROP program.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 240544
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Chan; Dorsey; Engardio; Mandelman; Melgar; Peskin; Safaí; Stefani
    • Noes: Preston; Ronen; Walton
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City amend the Charter to define “full-duty sworn officer”; require the Police Chief to make a report and recommendation on future staffing of full-duty sworn officers to the Police Commission every three years instead of two; require the Police Commission to report annually to the Board of Supervisors on Police Department staffing; and create a five-year program with possible renewals allowing police officers to continue working? for the Police Department after retiring, with pension payments deferred while they are working?
    Summary

    Amends the San Francisco Charter to define "Full-Duty Sworn Officer," revise police staffing criteria and reporting frequency, and re-establish a voluntary, cost-neutral Deferred Retirement Option Program (DROP) for police officers from July 2025 to July 2030, allowing up to 60 months of deferred compensation in an interest-bearing account (4% annual interest) for committed patrol or investigative work, while members continue regular salary and benefits but are ineligible for promotions and accrue no further pension service credit, with reauthorization required every five years after the initial term.

    Description

    Amends the San Francisco Charter to define "Full-Duty Sworn Officer," revise criteria for establishing police staffing levels, and change the Chief of Police's staffing report frequency from every two years to every three years. Additionally, it re-establishes a voluntary Deferred Retirement Option Program (DROP) for police officers, sergeants, and inspectors, effective July 2025 through July 2030. This program allows eligible members to earn up to 60 months of additional deferred compensation, credited monthly into an interest-bearing account at 4% annual interest, in exchange for committing to neighborhood patrol or investigative work. While participating, members continue to receive their regular salary and benefits but are ineligible for promotions and do not accrue further service credit for pension calculations; the program is intended to be cost-neutral and requires reauthorization by the Board of Supervisors every five years after its initial five-year term.

  • Prop G - Funding Rental Subsidies for Affordable Housing Developments Serving Low Income Seniors, Families, and Persons with DisabilitiesPassed
    11/5/2024
    Yes: 58.74% No: 41.26%

    Establishes fund providing rental subsidies for extremely low-income seniors, families, and persons with disabilities until 2046.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 240550
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Chan; Dorsey; Engardio; Mandelman; Melgar; Peskin; Preston; Ronen; Safaí; Stefani; Walton
    • Noes: None
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City amend the Charter to require the City to appropriate at least $8.25 million a year to pay for rental subsidies for affordable housing developments serving extremely low-income households of seniors, families, and persons with disabilities?
    Summary

    Establishes the Affordable Housing Opportunity Fund for Seniors, Families, and Persons with Disabilities within the San Francisco City Charter, effective November 5, 2024, to provide project-based rental subsidies for new and existing permanent affordable housing units for extremely low-income households, with annual appropriations of at least $8.25 million from FY 2026-2027 until the measure expires on December 31, 2046.

    Description

    Establishes the Affordable Housing Opportunity Fund for Seniors, Families, and Persons with Disabilities within the San Francisco City Charter, to be administered by the Mayor's Office of Housing and Community Development (MOHCD) and effective upon voter approval on November 5, 2024. This fund's primary purpose is to provide project-based rental subsidies for new and existing permanent affordable housing units, specifically targeting extremely low-income households including seniors, families, and persons with disabilities, with income thresholds generally up to 35% of the Area Median Income, and limiting allocation to existing housing to no more than 20% of annual funds. The City is mandated to appropriate at least $8.25 million annually to the Fund starting Fiscal Year 2026-2027, though the initial 2026-2027 appropriation can be reduced to $4 million if a projected budget deficit exceeds $250 million, with subsequent annual appropriations adjusted by discretionary revenue changes (up to 3% increase) but never falling below $8.25 million in deficit years. The measure is set to expire on December 31, 2046, unless extended by voters.

  • Prop H - Retirement Benefits for FirefightersPassed
    11/5/2024
    Yes: 52.63% No: 47.37%

    Lowers Fire Department retirement age from 58 to 55 for post-January 2012 members, aligning pension benefits.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 240552
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Chan; Dorsey; Engardio; Mandelman; Melgar; Peskin; Preston; Ronen; Safaí; Stefani
    • Noes: None
    • Other: Walton
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City amend the Charter to change how pension benefits are calculated for members of the Fire Department hired on or after January 7, 2012, by lowering the age these members can receive the highest pension from 58 to 55, and make those benefits the same as members hired before January 7, 2012?
    Summary

    Revises the San Francisco Charter to amend the Fire Department Service Retirement Pension for members who joined on or after January 7, 2012, by lowering the highest age factor percentage retirement age from 58 to 55, effective January 1, 2025, to align their pension benefit eligibility with earlier members.

    Description

    Revises the San Francisco Charter to amend the Fire Department Service Retirement Pension for members who joined or will join on or after January 7, 2012. This amendment changes the age factor percentage for benefit calculations, specifically lowering the retirement age at which these members can attain the highest age factor percentage from 58 to 55. The change aims to align their pension benefit eligibility with those who became Fire Department members before January 7, 2012, and will take effect on January 1, 2025, without applying to members who separated, retired, or died prior to that date.

  • Prop I - Retirement Benefits for Nurses and 911 OperatorsPassed
    11/5/2024
    Yes: 71.90% No: 28.10%

    Allowing nurses to buy service credit and reclassifying 911 dispatchers to safety retirement plan.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 240551
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Chan; Dorsey; Engardio; Mandelman; Melgar; Peskin; Preston; Ronen; Safaí; Stefani; Walton
    • Noes: None
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City amend the Charter to allow registered nurses who are members of the San Francisco Employees’ Retirement System and meet certain requirements to purchase credits toward their total pension years of service for time previously worked as per diem nurses, and to allow 911 dispatchers, supervisors, and coordinators to increase their pension benefits by joining the SFERS Miscellaneous Safety Plan for time worked starting in January 2025?
    Summary

    Amends the Charter of the City and County of San Francisco to allow registered nurses to purchase service credit for previous per diem work and reclassify public safety communications personnel to a miscellaneous safety retirement plan.

    Description

    Amends the Charter of the City and County of San Francisco to allow registered nurses, who are or become members of the San Francisco Employees' Retirement System and have worked an average of 32 hours or more per week for at least one year, to purchase up to three years of service credit for time previously worked as per diem nurses, and to reclassify public safety communications personnel, including 911 dispatchers, supervisors, and coordinators, from miscellaneous retirement plans to the miscellaneous safety retirement plan for compensation earned on and after January 4, 2025.

  • Prop J - Funding Programs Serving Children, Youth, and FamiliesPassed
    11/5/2024
    Yes: 82.13% No: 17.87%

    Establishes Initiative to coordinate, evaluate youth and family services, mandating budget review and School District spending proposals.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 240545
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Chan; Dorsey; Engardio; Mandelman; Melgar; Peskin; Preston; Ronen; Safaí; Stefani; Walton
    • Noes: None
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City amend the Charter to create an initiative led by the Mayor and the Superintendent of the School District with the mission of ensuring that City funding for children, youth, and families is used effectively?
    Summary

    Establishes the "Our Children, Our Families Initiative" as a joint effort to coordinate and deliver outcomes-based services for children, youth, and families, requiring the Initiative to evaluate relevant budget and spending, with annual consideration by the Mayor and Board of Supervisors, and mandates School District spending proposals and expenditure reports, allowing for PEEF funding reservation if inconsistent with plans, and clarifying Student Success Fund monies cannot supplant other required City funding, while prohibiting discretionary City funds without a data-sharing agreement.

    Description

    Establishes the "Our Children, Our Families Initiative" as a joint effort between San Francisco City departments and the School District to coordinate and deliver outcomes-based services for children, youth, and families, requiring the Initiative to use an "Outcomes Framework" to evaluate relevant budget and spending from the Children and Youth Fund, Public Education Enrichment Fund (PEEF), and general discretionary funds. The amendment mandates that the Mayor and Board of Supervisors consider the Initiative's findings annually during budget review, including public hearings. It further requires the School District to submit a five-year spending proposal for PEEF contributions, prohibiting funding until approved, and to provide annual expenditure reports for arts, music, sports, and library programs. The Board of Supervisors and Mayor are authorized to reserve PEEF funding if School District expenditures are inconsistent with the Charter, Outcomes Framework, or spending plans. Additionally, the amendment clarifies that Student Success Fund monies cannot supplant other required City funding for the School District or youth services, and prohibits discretionary City funds to the School District without a data-sharing agreement.

March
  • Prop B - Police Officer Staffing Levels Conditioned on Amending Existing or Future Tax FundingFailed
    3/5/2024
    Yes: 27.62% No: 72.38%

    Set minimum police staffing levels, require police budget, allow budget amendments, and set aside recruitment funds, contingent on new taxes.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 230985
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Ahsha Safaí, Connie Chan, Myrna Melgar, Aaron Peskin, Catherine Stefani, Shamann Walton
    • Noes: Matt Dorsey, Joel Engardio, Rafael Mandelman, Dean Preston, Hillary Ronen
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City amend the Charter to set minimum police officer staffing levels, require the City to budget enough money to pay the number of police officers employed in the previous year, allow the Police Department to introduce amendments to its budget, and set aside funds to pay for police recruitment, all for at least five years, but all if and only if the voters later adopt a new tax or amend an existing tax to fund these requirements?

2022

November
  • Prop A - Retiree Supplemental Cost of Living Adjustment: Retirement Board Contract with Executive DirectorPassed
    11/8/2022
    Yes: 65.07% No: 34.93%

    Eliminates COLA full funding requirement for pre-1996 retirees, adjusts allowances, and authorizes executive director contracts.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 220640
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Connie Chan; Matt Dorsey; Rafael Mandelman; Gordon Mar; Myrna Melgar; Aaron Peskin; Dean Preston; Hillary Ronen; Ahsha Safaí; Catherine Stefani; Shamann Walton
    • Noes: None
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City amend the Charter to allow City employees who retired before November 6, 1996, to receive a supplemental cost of living adjustment to their pensions even if the retirement system is not fully funded and allow the Retirement Board to have an individual employment contract with its executive director?
    Summary

    Amends the San Francisco Charter to eliminate full funding for supplemental cost of living adjustments (COLAs) for pre-November 6, 1996 retirees, subject to a monthly cap when the Retirement System is not fully funded, adjusts their base retirement allowance for previously unreceived supplemental COLAs from 2013, 2014, 2017, 2018, and 2019, and authorizes the Retirement Board to enter into individual contracts with any Retirement System executive director hired on or after January 1, 2023.

    Description

    Amends the San Francisco Charter to eliminate the full funding requirement for supplemental cost of living adjustments (COLAs) for members of the San Francisco Employees' Retirement System who retired before November 6, 1996, subject to a monthly monetary cap when the Retirement System is not fully funded. Additionally, it adjusts the base retirement allowance for these retirees and their qualified survivors to account for previously unreceived supplemental COLAs from 2013, 2014, 2017, 2018, and 2019, and authorizes the Retirement Board to enter into individual contracts with any Retirement System executive director hired on or after January 1, 2023.

  • Prop B - Public Works Department and Commission, Sanitation and Streets Department and CommissionPassedNotable
    11/8/2022
    Yes: 74.56% No: 25.44%

    Amends Charter, eliminating Sanitation and Streets Department, transferring duties to Public Works, removing qualifications, and narrowing Sanitation Commission's policy role.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 220635
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Connie Chan; Matt Dorsey; Rafael Mandelman; Myrna Melgar; Aaron Peskin; Dean Preston; Hillary Ronen; Catherine Stefani
    • Noes: Gordon Mar; Ahsha Safaí; Shamann Walton
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City amend the Charter to eliminate the Department of Sanitation and Streets and transfer its duties back to the Department of Public Works and to retain the Sanitation and Streets Commission and Public Works Commission?
    Summary

    Amends the San Francisco City Charter to eliminate the Department of Sanitation and Streets, transferring its responsibilities to the Department of Public Works, removing specific qualification requirements for commission members and the Director, and narrowing the Sanitation and Streets Commission's role to policy-setting within the Department of Public Works.

    Description

    Amends the San Francisco City Charter to eliminate the Department of Sanitation and Streets, transferring its responsibilities to the Department of Public Works. This amendment also removes specific qualification requirements for members of both the Sanitation and Streets Commission and the Public Works Commission, as well as for the Director of Public Works. Furthermore, it narrows the Sanitation and Streets Commission's role to policy-setting, data review, and hearings concerning sanitation standards and public right-of-way maintenance within the Department of Public Works, while assigning oversight of all other Department of Public Works functions to the Public Works Commission.

  • Prop C - Homelessness Oversight CommissionPassedNotable
    11/8/2022
    Yes: 67.37% No: 32.63%

    Establishes the Homelessness Oversight Commission to oversee housing, limiting funding-tied jurisdiction, requiring appointments, advising, and Controller audits.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 220535
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Connie Chan; Matt Dorsey; Rafael Mandelman; Gordon Mar; Myrna Melgar; Aaron Peskin; Dean Preston; Hillary Ronen; Ahsha Safaí; Catherine Stefani; Shamann Walton
    • Noes: None
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City amend the Charter to establish a Homelessness Oversight Commission to oversee the Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing and require the City Controller to conduct audits of services for people experiencing homelessness?
    Summary

    Establishes the Homelessness Oversight Commission in San Francisco to oversee the Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing, limiting its jurisdiction over eligibility and priority criteria when tied to funding, and further mandates that the Board of Supervisors adopt an ordinance for the Commission to appoint Local Homeless Coordinating Board members, while expanding advisory duties for both the Local Homeless Coordinating Board and the Shelter Monitoring Committee, and the Our City, Our Home Oversight Committee, advising the Commission and Health Commission on fund administration and appropriation, additionally subjecting all homelessness services to Controller audits.

    Description

    Establishes the Homelessness Oversight Commission in San Francisco to oversee the Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing, while explicitly limiting its jurisdiction over eligibility and priority criteria for programs and services when such criteria are conditions of funding. This amendment further requires the Board of Supervisors to adopt an ordinance allowing the Commission to appoint members of the Local Homeless Coordinating Board, mandates that both the Local Homeless Coordinating Board and the Shelter Monitoring Committee advise the Commission, and expands the advisory duties of the Our City, Our Home Oversight Committee to include advising the Commission and the Health Commission on the administration and appropriation of the Our City, Our Home Fund. Additionally, it specifies that all services related to homelessness will be subject to audit by the Controller.

  • Prop D - Affordable Housing – Initiative PetitionFailed
    11/8/2022
    Yes: 49.19% No: 50.81%

    Streamline approval for affordable housing and employee housing projects, removing Board of Supervisors' required oversight for certain financing.

    Origin: Signatures
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City amend the Charter to streamline approval of affordable housing that provides (1) housing for households with income up to 140% of area median income (AMI) but where the average household income is no more than 120% of AMI, (2) additional affordable housing units equal to 15% of the required number of affordable on-site units, or (3) housing for households that include at least one School District or City College employee, with certain household income restrictions; and to no longer require Board of Supervisors' approval for those types of projects if they use City property or financing?
  • Prop E - Affordable Housing – Board of SupervisorsFailed
    11/8/2022
    Yes: 46.07% No: 53.93%

    Establishes streamlined housing approval, increasing affordable units, mandating larger units, and eliminating environmental and zoning protections for projects.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 220631
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Connie Chan; Gordon Mar; Aaron Peskin; Dean Preston; Hillary Ronen; Ahsha Safaí; Shamann Walton
    • Noes: Matt Dorsey; Rafael Mandelman; Myrna Melgar; Catherine Stefani
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City amend the Charter to streamline approval of affordable housing that provides (1) housing for households with income up to 120% of area median income (AMI) but where the average household income is no more than 80% of AMI, (2) additional affordable housing units equal to 8% of the total number of units in the entire project, or (3) housing for households that include at least one School District or City College employee, with certain household income restrictions; and to continue requiring Board of Supervisors' approval for those types of projects if they use City property or financing?
    Summary

    Establishes the Affordable Housing Production Act, a charter amendment in San Francisco, which streamlines housing development through expedited, ministerial approvals for qualifying projects while increasing affordable housing components, mandating higher percentages of two- and three-bedroom units, and eliminating or reducing various historic, environmental, and zoning protections.

    Description

    Establishes the Affordable Housing Production Act (Chan/Peskin Measure), a charter amendment aimed at significantly streamlining housing development in San Francisco by introducing expedited, ministerial approvals for qualifying projects. This measure would increase the required affordable housing component for these developments by an additional 8% (e.g., 30% BMR for a 100-unit project) and mandate higher percentages of two- and three-bedroom units. To facilitate this, it would eliminate or reduce various local and state historic and environmental protections, subjective zoning standards, and exempt qualifying projects from CEQA and shadow review, while limiting design review to aesthetic considerations and allowing ministerial demolition or alteration of certain historic resources not specifically protected.

  • Prop F - Library Preservation FundPassed
    11/8/2022
    Yes: 82.58% No: 17.42%

    Renew Library Fund for 25 years, allow funding freeze during large deficits, increase minimum library hours.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Connie Chan, Matt Dorsey, Rafael Mandelman, Gordon Mar, Myrna Melgar, Aaron Peskin, Dean Preston, Hillary Ronen, Ahsha Safaí, Catherine Stefani, Shamann Walton
    • Noes: None
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City amend the Charter to renew the Library Preservation Fund for 25 years, allow the City to temporarily freeze the annual minimum funding for the Library when the City anticipates a budget deficit over $300 million, and require the Library to increase the minimum hours the Main Library and its branches must be open per week?
  • Prop G - Student Success Fund – Grants to the San Francisco Unified School DistrictPassedNotable
    11/8/2022
    Yes: 77.78% No: 22.22%

    Establishes the Student Success Fund providing $60 million annually for 15 years to SFUSD schools for evidence-based programs.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 220639
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Connie Chan; Matt Dorsey; Rafael Mandelman; Gordon Mar; Myrna Melgar; Aaron Peskin; Dean Preston; Hillary Ronen; Ahsha Safaí; Catherine Stefani; Shamann Walton
    • Noes: None
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City amend the Charter to provide additional funding for grants to the San Francisco Unified School District for 15 years to improve student academic achievement and social/emotional wellness?
    Summary

    Establishes the Student Success Fund, a San Francisco charter amendment providing $60 million annually for 15 years to San Francisco Unified School District (SFUSD) schools from excess Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF) for evidence-based wrap-around programs to improve student academic achievement and social-emotional wellness, while prohibiting its use for general deficits and reserving unused funds for stability.

    Description

    Establishes the Student Success Fund, a San Francisco charter amendment designed to provide $60 million annually for 15 years to San Francisco Unified School District (SFUSD) schools. This funding, sourced from the excess Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF), is specifically for grants to implement evidence-based wrap-around programs aimed at improving student academic achievement and social-emotional wellness, including enhanced curriculum, enrichment activities, tutoring, and wellness specialists, while explicitly prohibiting its use for filling SFUSD's general deficits or basic operational positions, with unused funds to be held in a reserve to ensure program stability.

June
  • Prop B - Building Inspection CommissionPassed
    6/7/2022
    Yes: 61.99% No: 38.01%

    Change appointments and qualifications for Building Inspection Commission members, empower Mayor to appoint Building Inspection Director.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Connie Chan, Matt Haney, Rafael Mandelman, Gordon Mar, Myrna Melgar, Aaron Peskin, Dean Preston, Hillary Ronen, Ahsha Safaí, Catherine Stefani, Shamann Walton
    • Noes: None
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City amend the Charter to change the appointment process and qualifications for Building Inspection Commission members and have the Mayor appoint the Director of the Department of Building Inspection?
  • Prop C - Recall Timelines and Vacancy AppointmentsFailed
    6/7/2022
    Yes: 42.05% No: 57.95%

    Extend recall petition ban to 12 months; prohibit elections within 12 months of scheduled election; bar interim appointee from running.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 211287
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Connie Chan; Matt Haney; Gordon Mar; Aaron Peskin; Dean Preston; Hillary Ronen; Shamann Walton
    • Noes: Rafael Mandelman; Myrna Melgar; Ahsha Safaí; Catherine Stefani
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City amend the Charter to further limit the period during which the voters could recall a City elected official, and when an official is recalled, to prevent the person appointed to fill that vacancy from running as a candidate to remain in that office?
    Summary

    Amends the San Francisco City and County Charter to extend the period during which recall petitions cannot be initiated from six to twelve months after an official assumes office, prohibits the submission of a recall petition if the resulting recall election would fall within twelve months of a regularly scheduled election, and stipulates that any interim officer appointed to fill a vacancy created by a recall election held on or after June 7, 2022, is ineligible to be a candidate in the subsequent vacancy election.

    Description

    Amends the San Francisco City and County Charter to extend the period during which recall petitions cannot be initiated from six to twelve months after an official assumes office, and prohibits the submission of a recall petition if the resulting recall election would fall within twelve months of a regularly scheduled election for that office. Furthermore, it stipulates that any interim officer appointed to fill a vacancy created by a recall election held on or after June 7, 2022, is ineligible to be a candidate in the subsequent vacancy election.

2020

November
  • Prop B - Department of Sanitation and Streets, Sanitations and Streets Commission, and Public Works CommissionPassedNotable
    11/3/2020
    Yes: 61.33% No: 38.67%

    Establishes new Sanitation Department from Public Works, creating separate oversight commissions, and mandating performance audits and cost analyses.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 200510
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Haney; Mar; Peskin; Preston; Ronen; Safaí; Walton
    • Noes: Sandra Lee Fewer; Mandelman; Stefani; Yee
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City amend the Charter to create a Department of Sanitation and Streets with oversight from a Sanitation and Streets Commission, and to establish a Public Works Commission to oversee the Department of Public Works?
    Summary

    Establishes a new Department of Sanitation and Streets (DSS) to assume specific duties from the Department of Public Works (DPW), creates separate commissions to oversee both departments, and mandates annual performance audits and cost analyses for transparency and efficiency.

    Description

    Establishes a new Department of Sanitation and Streets (DSS) to assume specific duties previously performed by the Department of Public Works (DPW), including street sweeping, sidewalk cleaning, litter abatement, public restroom and trash receptacle maintenance, illegal dumping/graffiti removal, median/street tree maintenance, and pest control, while the DPW retains responsibilities for designing, building, and improving City infrastructure. The amendment creates a Sanitation and Streets Commission (SSC) to oversee the DSS, and a Public Works Commission (PWC) to oversee the DPW, both composed of five members with specific qualifications, tasked with setting policy, reviewing performance, approving contracts, and conducting annual reviews of departmental positions. Furthermore, it mandates an annual performance audit and cost and waste analysis by the Services Audit Unit for both the DSS and DPW to identify inefficiencies, recommend improvements, and ensure transparency in operations and resource utilization.

  • Prop C - Removing Citizenship Requirement for Members of City BodiesPassed
    11/3/2020
    Yes: 54.10% No: 45.90%

    Replacing citizenship/voter registration requirements for board/commission members with city residency and legal voting age, allowing exceptions.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 200452
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Fewer; Haney; Mandelman; Mar; Peskin; Preston; Ronen; Safaí; Stefani; Walton; Yee
    • Noes: None
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City amend the Charter to remove the requirement that people serving on City boards, commissions and advisory bodies be registered voters and U.S. citizens, and continue to require those people be old enough to vote in City elections and be San Francisco residents?
    Summary

    Revises the Charter of the City and County of San Francisco to alter eligibility requirements for members of boards, commissions, and advisory bodies, replacing the previous mandate for United States citizenship and voter registration with a new requirement for City residency and legal voting age, while permitting exceptions for bodies established by Charter or legislative act, and allowing appointing officers to waive age or residency requirements for legislatively established bodies if a qualified candidate cannot be found.

    Description

    Revises the Charter of the City and County of San Francisco to alter eligibility requirements for members of boards, commissions, and advisory bodies, replacing the previous mandate for United States citizenship and voter registration with a new requirement for City residency and legal voting age. The amendment permits exceptions to these age and residency requirements for bodies established by the Charter or by legislative act, and allows appointing officers to waive age or residency requirements for legislatively established bodies if a qualified candidate cannot be found.

  • Prop D - Sheriff OversightPassed
    11/3/2020
    Yes: 66.90% No: 33.10%

    Establishes oversight board and inspector general; enhances accountability; investigates misconduct and in-custody deaths; advises on operations.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 200514
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Fewer; Haney; Mandelman; Mar; Peskin; Preston; Ronen; Safaí; Stefani; Walton; Yee
    • Noes: None
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City amend the Charter to create a Sheriff’s Department Office of Inspector General and a Sheriff’s Department Oversight Board that would make recommendations to the Sheriff and the Board of Supervisors about the operations of the Sheriff’s Department?
    Summary

    Establishes the Sheriff's Department Oversight Board (SDOB) and the Sheriff's Department Office of Inspector General (OIG) to enhance accountability and oversight of the San Francisco Sheriff's Department through advising, investigations, policy recommendations, and audits, with both entities granted powers to hold hearings, issue subpoenas, and access records.

    Description

    Establishes the Sheriff's Department Oversight Board (SDOB) and the Sheriff's Department Office of Inspector General (OIG) to enhance accountability and oversight of the San Francisco Sheriff's Department. The SDOB, a seven-member body appointed by the Board of Supervisors and the Mayor, is charged with advising the Sheriff and Board of Supervisors on department operations, appointing and evaluating the Inspector General, recommending best practices, and conducting community outreach. The OIG, operating independently under the SDOB, is mandated to investigate non-criminal misconduct by Sheriff's Department employees and contractors, investigate all in-custody deaths, recommend disciplinary actions, and develop policy recommendations, while also monitoring SFSD operations through audits. Both the SDOB and OIG are granted powers to hold hearings, issue subpoenas, and access necessary records and facilities, with the amendment also integrating the SDOB into existing charter provisions for the suspension and removal of officers for official misconduct.

  • Prop E - Police StaffingPassedNotable
    11/3/2020
    Yes: 71.35% No: 28.65%

    Eliminates minimum police staffing level, establishes biennial reports to Police Commission, revises civilian conversion rules, ensuring public safety.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 200515
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Fewer; Haney; Mandelman; Mar; Peskin; Preston; Ronen; Safaí; Stefani; Walton; Yee
    • Noes: None
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City amend the Charter to remove the requirement that the San Francisco Police Department maintain a minimum of 1,971 full-duty sworn police officers and replace the requirement with regular evaluations of police staffing levels?
    Summary

    Eliminates the mandatory minimum police staffing level from the San Francisco City and County Charter, establishing a new process for the Chief of Police to submit biennial reports to the Police Commission on staffing levels and revising provisions for converting sworn to civilian roles upon vacancy without layoffs, requiring joint certification that conversions will not diminish neighborhood policing or substantially interfere with public safety services.

    Description

    Eliminates the mandatory minimum police staffing level of 1,971 full-duty sworn officers from the San Francisco City and County Charter. The amendment instead establishes a new process requiring the Chief of Police to submit a biennial report to the Police Commission, detailing current staffing and recommending future levels based on factors like workload and public service objectives. The Police Commission is mandated to adopt methodologies for evaluating these staffing levels, hold public hearings on the Chief's report, and consider it when approving the department's proposed budget, though it is not bound to adopt the recommendations. Furthermore, the amendment revises provisions for converting sworn positions to civilian roles, stipulating that such conversions can only occur upon vacancy without layoffs, and requiring joint certification from the Controller and Chief of Police—with Police Commission input—that these conversions will not diminish neighborhood policing or substantially interfere with public safety services.

  • Prop G - Youth Voting in Local ElectionsPassed
    11/3/2020
    Yes: 50.79% No: 49.21%

    Authorize San Francisco youth aged 16 and 17 to vote in municipal elections by redefining "voter."

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 200477
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Fewer; Haney; Mandelman; Mar; Peskin; Preston; Ronen; Safaí; Stefani; Walton; Yee
    • Noes: None
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City amend the Charter to allow San Francisco residents to vote for local candidates and local ballot measures if they are U.S. citizens, at least 16 years old and registered to vote?
    Summary

    Amends the Charter of the City and County of San Francisco to allow 16 and 17-year-olds to vote in municipal elections by redefining "voter" to include persons aged 16 or 17 who meet all other state law voter registration qualifications and are registered to vote.

    Description

    Amends the Charter of the City and County of San Francisco to authorize youths aged 16 and 17 to vote in municipal elections. Specifically, for the purpose of municipal elections, the amendment redefines "voter" to include any person who is at least 16 years old, meets all other state law qualifications for voter registration (excluding those related to age), and is registered to vote with the Department of Elections.

March
  • Prop C - Retiree Health Care Benefits for Former Employees of the San Francisco Housing AuthorityPassed
    3/3/2020
    Yes: 70.55% No: 29.45%

    Extends retiree health care benefits to former Housing Authority employees transitioning to City employment without a service break.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 190945
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Brown; Fewer; Haney; Mandelman; Mar; Peskin; Ronen; Safaí; Stefani; Walton; Yee
    • Noes: None
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City amend the Charter to make retiree health care coverage available to certain City employees who previously worked for the San Francisco Housing Authority based on their combined years of service and date of hire?
    Summary

    Proposes to amend the Charter of the City and County of San Francisco to extend retiree health care benefits to Housing Authority employees who transitioned to City and County employment between March 7, 2019, and March 1, 2021, with no break in service, and affirms the Planning Department's California Environmental Quality Act determination.

    Description

    Proposes to amend the Charter of the City and County of San Francisco to extend retiree health care benefits to employees of the Housing Authority who transitioned to employment with the City and County between March 7, 2019, and March 1, 2021, provided there was no break in service between their Housing Authority and City/County employment. This amendment also affirms the Planning Department's determination under the California Environmental Quality Act.

2019

November
  • Prop B - Department of Disability and Aging ServicesPassed
    11/5/2019
    Yes: 78.49% No: 21.51%

    Renaming Aging Services offices and funds to Disability and Aging Services; mandates three specific commission qualifications.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 190570
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Brown; Fewer; Mandelman; Mar; Peskin; Ronen; Safaí; Stefani; Walton; Yee
    • Noes: None
    • Absent: Haney
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City amend the Charter to change the name of the Department of Aging and Adult Services to the Department of Disability and Aging Services; to change the name of the Aging and Adult Services Commission to the Disability and Aging Services Commission; and to add new qualifications for three of the seven seats on this Commission?
    Summary

    Amends the San Francisco City Charter by renaming the Aging and Adult Services Commission, Department of Aging and Adult Services, and Aging and Adult Services Community Living Fund to the Disability and Aging Services Commission, Department of Disability and Aging Services, and Disability and Aging Services Community Living Fund, respectively, and establishes specific qualifications for three seats on the newly renamed Commission.

    Description

    Amends the San Francisco City Charter by renaming the Aging and Adult Services Commission, Department of Aging and Adult Services, and Aging and Adult Services Community Living Fund to the Disability and Aging Services Commission, Department of Disability and Aging Services, and Disability and Aging Services Community Living Fund, respectively. Additionally, the amendment establishes specific qualifications for three seats on the newly renamed Commission: Seat 1 must be held by a person 60 years or older, Seat 2 by a person 18 years or older with an Americans with Disabilities Act-defined disability, and Seat 3 by a U.S. military veteran discharged under conditions other than dishonorable, with existing members in these seats required to meet these criteria by January 15, 2020, to continue their service.

  • Prop C - Vapor ProductsFailed
    11/5/2019
    Yes: 18.19% No: 81.81%

    Overturn e-cigarette sale suspension, adopt new regulations on e-cigarette sale, manufacture, distribution, and advertising.

    Origin: Signatures
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City overturn the law passed by the Board of Supervisors suspending the sale of electronic cigarettes until they receive FDA authorization, and adopt new regulations on the sale, manufacture, distribution and advertising of electronic cigarettes in San Francisco?

2018

November
  • Prop B - City Privacy GuidelinesPassedNotable
    11/6/2018
    Yes: 57.58% No: 42.42%

    Establishes Privacy First Policy, defining Personal Information; mandates adherence to principles for collection, storage, sharing, and use.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 180545
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Cohen; Brown; Kim; Mandelman; Peskin; Ronen; Safaí; Stefani; Yee
    • Noes: None
    • Other: Fewer; Tang
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City amend the Charter to include privacy guidelines and require the City Administrator to propose a privacy ordinance consistent with the guidelines to the Board of Supervisors?
    Summary

    Establishes a "Privacy First Policy" for San Francisco, mandating adherence to principles for collecting, storing, sharing, and using "Personal Information" across City practices, third-party contracts, and regulated entities, while directing the City Administrator to propose an implementing ordinance and provide triennial reports on the policy's implementation and emerging privacy threats.

    Description

    Establishes a "Privacy First Policy" for the City and County of San Francisco, broadly defining "Personal Information" to encompass various identifiers and sensitive data. The amendment mandates adherence to specific principles for the collection, storage, sharing, and use of Personal Information, including requirements for informed consent, data minimization, de-identification, security, individual access and correction rights, and bias mitigation. These principles apply to the City's own practices, third-party contracts, and entities under the City's regulatory authority. Additionally, it directs the City Administrator to propose an implementing ordinance by May 31, 2019, and to provide triennial reports on the policy's implementation and emerging privacy threats, clarifying that the principles serve as a guide and do not limit other privacy protections, subject to federal or state preemption.

June
  • Prop A - Public Utilities Revenue BondsPassed
    6/5/2018
    Yes: 77.22% No: 22.78%

    Authorize PUC to issue revenue bonds for power, water, and clean water facilities, prohibiting fossil fuel financing.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 171308
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Breed; Cohen; Fewer; Kim; Peskin; Ronen; Safaí; Jeff Sheehy; Stefani; Tang; Yee
    • Noes: None
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City authorize the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission to issue revenue bonds to build or improve the City's clean power facilities, with approval by two-thirds of the Board of Supervisors, and prohibit the PUC from financing construction of power plants that generate electricity from fossil fuels or nuclear power?
    Summary

    Authorizes the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (PUC) to issue revenue bonds for water, clean water, and power facilities, including new clean energy power facilities like energy storage and electric vehicle charging, while prohibiting the financing of fossil fuel or nuclear power plants, provided approval by a two-thirds vote of the Board of Supervisors.

    Description

    Authorizes the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (PUC) to issue revenue bonds for power facilities, in addition to its existing authority for water and clean water utilities, provided such issuance is approved by a two-thirds vote of the Board of Supervisors. This amendment clarifies the PUC's bond authority to include reconstruction, replacement, expansion, repair, or improvement of water, clean water, and power facilities, or any other lawful purpose of these utilities, with an emphasis on financing new power facilities that enhance clean energy delivery, reliability, safety, and sustainability through technologies like energy storage and electric vehicle charging, while explicitly prohibiting the financing of power plants that generate electricity using fossil fuels or nuclear energy.

  • Prop B - Prohibiting Appointed Commissioners from Running for OfficePassed
    6/5/2018
    Yes: 69.72% No: 30.28%

    Require appointed board and commission members to immediately forfeit seats when running for elective office.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 171306
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Fewer; Kim; Peskin; Ronen; Safaí; Stefani; Yee
    • Noes: Breed; Cohen; Jeff Sheehy; Tang
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City require appointed members of boards and commissions established by the Charter to forfeit their appointed seat when they file to run for state or local elective office?
    Summary

    Amends the San Francisco City Charter to mandate that appointed members of city boards and commissions, excluding citizen advisory committees, forfeit their positions upon filing candidacy for state or local elective office, with exceptions for elected officials and specific elected board members.

    Description

    Amends the San Francisco City Charter to require that appointed members of city boards and commissions, with the exception of citizen advisory committees, immediately forfeit their positions upon filing a declaration of candidacy for any state or local elective office, including specific city offices and the Bay Area Rapid Transit Board of Directors. This forfeiture rule does not apply to elected officials who also serve on boards or commissions, nor to elected members of specific bodies such as the Retirement Board, Health Service Board, or Retiree Healthcare Trust Fund Board.

2016

November
  • Prop D - Vacancy AppointmentsFailed
    11/8/2016
    Yes: 47.57% No: 52.43%

    Establishes new procedures for filling local elective office vacancies, requiring special elections for Supervisors and mayoral appointments.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 151273
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Avalos; Campos; Kim; Mar; Peskin; Yee
    • Noes: Breed; Cohen; Farrell; Tang; Wiener
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City amend the Charter to require the Mayor to make a temporary appointment to fill a vacancy in a local elected office within 28 days of the date of the vacancy; provide that the person who temporarily fills a vacancy on the Board of Supervisors cannot run in the election held to fill that vacancy for the remainder of the term; and require the City to hold an election to fill a vacancy on the Board of Supervisors within 126 to 154 days if there is no City election scheduled, within 180 days if another election is already scheduled within that period, or more than 180 days later if requested by the Director of Elections and approved by the Mayor and the Board of Supervisors?
    Summary

    Amends the San Francisco Charter to establish new procedures for filling vacancies in local elective offices, specifically requiring special elections for Board of Supervisors vacancies and mayoral appointments for other offices.

    Description

    Amends the San Francisco Charter to establish new procedures for filling vacancies in local elective offices. Specifically, for a vacancy in the Office of Member of the Board of Supervisors, the Department of Elections is now required to hold a special election, unless a regularly scheduled election is already set to occur within 180 days of the vacancy; in such cases, the Mayor must appoint an interim Supervisor who is explicitly ineligible to compete in that special election. Furthermore, for vacancies in other specified local elective offices, such as Assessor-Recorder, City Attorney, and Sheriff, the Mayor is now mandated to appoint a successor within 28 days of the vacancy.

  • Prop E - Responsibility for Maintaining Street Trees and Surrounding SidewalksPassedNotable
    11/8/2016
    Yes: 78.59% No: 21.41%

    Transfers primary responsibility for street tree maintenance to the City, establishing a fund with annual $19 million contribution.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 160381
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Avalos; Breed; Campos; Cohen; Farrell; Kim; Mar; Peskin; Tang; Wiener; Yee
    • Noes: None
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City amend the Charter to transfer responsibility from property owners to the City for maintaining trees on sidewalks around their property as well as sidewalks damaged by the trees, and pay for this by setting aside $19 million per year from its General Fund, adjusted annually based on City revenues?
    Summary

    Transfers primary responsibility for street tree maintenance to the City and County of San Francisco effective July 1, 2017, relieving property owners of this duty and associated liability, while establishing a dedicated Street Tree Maintenance Fund with an initial $19 million annual contribution for maintenance, removal, administrative costs, and grants to the San Francisco Unified School District, explicitly excluding new tree planting.

    Description

    Transfers primary responsibility for the maintenance of street trees to the City and County of San Francisco, effective July 1, 2017, thereby relieving abutting property owners of this duty and associated liability for injuries or damages caused by the City's failure to maintain, while clarifying that property owners retain responsibility for general sidewalk care, excluding tree-related sidewalk repairs. The amendment establishes a dedicated Street Tree Maintenance Fund, into which the City will contribute an initial $19 million annually, beginning in fiscal year 2017-2018, with this amount adjusted yearly based on changes in aggregate discretionary City revenues, though growth in contributions can be suspended under severe budget deficit conditions. Funds are designated for street tree maintenance and removal, administrative costs, and annual grants up to $500,000 to the San Francisco Unified School District for tree maintenance and removal on school property, explicitly excluding the planting of new street trees; "maintenance" broadly encompasses both routine care like watering and weed control, and major actions such as structural pruning and tree replacement.

  • Prop F - Youth Voting in Local ElectionsFailed
    11/8/2016
    Yes: 47.90% No: 52.10%

    Authorize 16 and 17-year-olds to vote in municipal elections for Board of Education and Community College District.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 150267
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Avalos; Breed; Campos; Kim; Mar; Peskin; Tang; Wiener; Yee
    • Noes: Cohen; Farrell
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City amend the Charter to allow San Francisco residents to vote on local candidates and local ballot measures if they are U.S. citizens, at least 16 years old and registered to vote?
    Summary

    Amends the Charter of the City and County of San Francisco by revising Article XVII to authorize individuals aged 16 and 17 to vote in municipal elections, specifically for the Board of Education and the Governing Board of the Community College District, provided they meet all other state law qualifications for voter registration.

    Description

    Amends the Charter of the City and County of San Francisco by revising Article XVII, specifically the definition of "Voter," to authorize individuals aged 16 and 17 to vote in municipal elections. This change allows persons at least 16 years old to be considered a "voter" for municipal elections, provided they meet all other state law qualifications for voter registration, excluding age, and are registered with the Department of Elections; this specifically applies to elections for the Board of Education and the Governing Board of the Community College District.

  • Prop G - Police OversightPassed
    11/8/2016
    Yes: 80.77% No: 19.23%

    Renames OCC to DPA, grants budget authority, mandates audits, enhances investigation and disciplinary filing roles.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 160586
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Avalos; Breed; Campos; Cohen; Farrell; Kim; Mar; Peskin; Tang; Wiener; Yee
    • Noes: None
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City amend the Charter to rename the Office of Citizen Complaints as the Department of Police Accountability (DPA); require the DPA to review the San Francisco Police Department's use-of-force policies and its handling of claims of police misconduct; allow the DPA to audit or review any SFPD policy, procedure or practice; specify the City records that the DPA may access to perform its duties; and provide that the DPA would separately submit its budget to the Mayor?
    Summary

    Renames the Office of Citizen Complaints (OCC) to the Department of Police Accountability (DPA), granting it direct budget authority, mandating bi-annual performance audits of police misconduct handling with public access to information, and clarifying the DPA Director's enhanced role in investigating complaints, recommending discipline, and filing charges with the Police Commission if the Chief fails to act.

    Description

    Renames the Office of Citizen Complaints (OCC) to the Department of Police Accountability (DPA), granting the DPA direct authority over its proposed budget, separate from the Police Department's. The amendment further mandates that the DPA conduct a performance audit every two years, specifically reviewing how the Police Department handles claims of officer misconduct and use of force, and allows for public access to information on misconduct claims and audit results. Additionally, it clarifies the DPA Director's enhanced role in investigating complaints, recommending disciplinary action, and, under specific conditions, filing charges directly with the Police Commission if the Chief of Police fails to act on sustained complaints.

  • Prop H - Public AdvocateFailed
    11/8/2016
    Yes: 47.76% No: 52.24%

    Establishes elected Public Advocate to review city programs, investigate complaints, appoint Citizen Complaints Director, and ensure funding.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 160583
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Avalos; Campos; Kim; Mar; Peskin; Yee
    • Noes: Breed; Cohen; Farrell; Tang; Wiener
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City amend the Charter to create the position of Public Advocate, responsible for investigating and attempting to resolve public complaints concerning City services and programs; and shall it be City policy to provide the Public Advocate with sufficient funding and a support staff of at least 25 people?
    Summary

    Establishes the Office of the Public Advocate in San Francisco as an elected position with a four-year, two-term limit, empowered to review City programs, investigate complaints, and introduce legislation, while also assuming mayoral powers in appointing the Director of the Office of Citizen Complaints and ensuring sufficient funding and staffing.

    Description

    Establishes the Office of the Public Advocate in San Francisco as an elected position, serving a four-year term with a two-term limit, whose salary will be determined by the Civil Service Commission based on comparable offices. This new office is empowered to review City programs and services, investigate and resolve public complaints, and receive and investigate specified whistleblower complaints, granting it access to City records, the authority to issue subpoenas, and the ability to introduce legislation. The Public Advocate will also assume the power to appoint the Director of the Office of Citizen Complaints, a role previously held by the Mayor. Furthermore, the amendment sets City policy to ensure sufficient funding and minimum staffing for the Public Advocate's office, including dedicated staff for constituent services and investigations per Supervisorial district, and outlines procedures for filling vacancies and removal for official misconduct.

  • Prop I - Funding for Seniors and Adults with DisabilitiesPassed
    11/8/2016
    Yes: 66.26% No: 33.74%

    Mandates annual City funding for Dignity Fund supporting seniors and disabled adults, establishing planning and oversight.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 160585
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Avalos; Breed; Campos; Cohen; Farrell; Kim; Mar; Wiener; Yee
    • Noes: Peskin; Tang
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City amend the Charter to establish the Dignity Fund and set aside at least $38 million a year, plus scheduled increases, from the General Fund until June 30, 2037, to pay for programs and services to assist seniors and adults with disabilities?
    Summary

    Establishes the Dignity Fund in San Francisco's Charter to support Seniors and Adults with Disabilities, administered by DAAS with a sunset date of June 30, 2037, mandating annual City contributions, outlining a four-year planning process for expenditures with transparency and community participation, creating an 11-member Oversight and Advisory Committee, and renaming the "Commission on Aging" while excluding certain services from Dignity Fund support.

    Description

    Establishes the Dignity Fund within San Francisco's Charter to support Seniors (60+) and Adults with Disabilities (18+), administered by the Department of Aging and Adult Services (DAAS), with a sunset date of June 30, 2037. The amendment mandates annual City contributions, beginning with a $38 million baseline for fiscal year 2016-2017, increasing by $6 million in FY 2017-2018, and then by $3 million annually for the subsequent nine years until FY 2026-2027, with future contributions adjusted based on aggregate discretionary City revenues, though contributions can be frozen if the City's projected budget deficit exceeds $200 million. It outlines a four-year planning process for fund expenditures, including a Community Needs Assessment and Services and Allocation Plan, emphasizing transparency, community participation, and equity, while also creating an 11-member Oversight and Advisory Committee to monitor the fund and recommend standards for contractor selection, prioritizing non-profit agencies. Furthermore, the amendment renames the "Commission on Aging" to the "Aging and Adult Services Commission" and updates its responsibilities, explicitly excluding certain services like law enforcement, incidental benefits, and most capital or real property acquisitions from Dignity Fund support.

  • Prop J - Funding for Homelessness and TransportationPassed
    11/8/2016
    Yes: 67.17% No: 32.83%

    Allows non-implementation of homelessness and transportation set-asides to ensure city's fiscal strength during unforeseen costs/revenue impacts.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 160581
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: John Avalos, London Breed, David Campos, Malia Cohen, Mark Farrell, Gordon Mar, Katy Tang, Scott Wiener
    • Noes: Jane Kim, Aaron Peskin, Norman Yee
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City amend the Charter to create a Homeless Housing and Services Fund, which would provide services to the homeless including housing and Navigation Centers, programs to prevent homelessness and assistance in transitioning out of homelessness by allocating $50 million per year for 24 years, adjusted annually; and create a Transportation Improvement Fund, which would be used to improve the City's transportation network by allocating $101.6 million per year for 24 years, adjusted annually?
    Summary

    Establishes Proposition J, a charter amendment ensuring the City's fiscal strength through provisions that allow non-implementation of homelessness and transportation set-asides if an election introduces significant new costs and impacts anticipated revenues, thereby maintaining a balanced budget.

    Description

    Establishes Proposition J, a charter amendment containing sections 16.134(f) and 16.135(h), which are designed to ensure the City's fiscal strength. These specific provisions allow for the non-implementation of set-asides for homelessness and transportation, originally created by Proposition J, in situations where an election introduces significant new costs and impacts anticipated revenues, thereby enabling the City to maintain a balanced budget.

  • Prop L - MTA Appointments and BudgetFailed
    11/8/2016
    Yes: 44.95% No: 55.05%

    Modify SFMTA governance: split Board appointments between Mayor and Supervisors, reduce Board budget rejection votes.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 160589
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Avalos; Campos; Kim; Mar; Peskin; Yee
    • Noes: Breed; Cohen; Farrell; Tang; Wiener
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City allow the Mayor to nominate four members to the SFMTA Board of Directors, subject to approval by the Board of Supervisors; allow the Board of Supervisors to appoint three members; reduce from seven to six the number of votes needed for the Board of Supervisors to reject the SFMTA's proposed budget; and require the SFMTA to respond to the Board's findings and submit a revised budget if the Board of Supervisors rejected the original budget?
    Summary

    Amends the San Francisco City Charter to modify SFMTA governance by splitting appointment power for its Board of Directors between the Mayor and the Board of Supervisors, lowering the vote threshold for the Board of Supervisors to reject the SFMTA's proposed budget, and mandating that the Board of Supervisors adopt findings to explain any such rejection.

    Description

    Amends the San Francisco City Charter to modify the governance of the Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) by splitting the appointment power for its Board of Directors, allowing the Mayor to nominate four members (subject to Board of Supervisors confirmation) and the Board of Supervisors to nominate the remaining three members. Additionally, the amendment lowers the vote threshold required for the Board of Supervisors to reject the SFMTA's proposed budget from seven to six votes, and mandates that the Board of Supervisors adopt findings to explain any such rejection.

  • Prop M - Housing and Development CommissionFailed
    11/8/2016
    Yes: 44.20% No: 55.80%

    Establishes Housing and Development Commission to oversee new departments, appoint heads, review agreements, and adopt housing funding rules.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 160588
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Avalos; Campos; Kim; Mar; Peskin; Yee
    • Noes: Breed; Cohen; Farrell; Tang; Wiener
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City amend the Charter to create the Housing and Development Commission to oversee two new departments (the Department of Economic and Workforce Development and the Department of Housing and Community Development) that would take over the duties of the Office of Economic and Workforce Development and the Mayor's Office of Housing and Community Development, which would cease to exist?
    Summary

    Establishes the Housing and Development Commission in San Francisco to oversee new departments, appoint and evaluate department heads, review development agreements and housing requirements, and adopt rules for affordable housing development and funding, while also modifying existing Charter sections for commission procedures and housing fund references.

    Description

    Establishes the Housing and Development Commission in San Francisco, effective March 1, 2017, to oversee the newly created Department of Economic and Workforce Development and Department of Housing and Community Development, which will succeed existing offices on May 15, 2017. This Commission is empowered to appoint, evaluate, and remove the heads of these departments; review and recommend on proposed development agreements, conveyance of certain surplus City property, and changes to inclusionary/affordable housing requirements; and adopt competitive selection rules for affordable housing development and funding expenditures, which may supersede prior ordinances. Additionally, the amendment modifies existing Charter sections to include the new Commission in suspension and removal procedures and updates references to the "Mayor's Office of Housing" to the "Department of Housing and Community Development" within the Housing Trust Fund provisions, clarifying its role in disbursing funds for affordable housing, down payment assistance, and housing stabilization programs, and in administering the Complete Neighborhoods Infrastructure Grant Program.

  • Prop N - Non-Citizen Voting in School Board ElectionsPassed
    11/8/2016
    Yes: 54.39% No: 45.61%

    Allow non-citizen San Francisco residents who are legal guardians of district children to vote for Board of Education members.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: John Avalos, London Breed, David Campos, Malia Cohen, Jane Kim, Gordon Mar, Aaron Peskin, Katy Tang, Scott Wiener, Norman Yee
    • Noes: Mark Farrell
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City allow a non-citizen resident of San Francisco who is of legal voting age and the parent, legal guardian or legally recognized caregiver of a child living in the San Francisco Unified School District to vote for members of the Board of Education?
June
  • Prop B - Park, Recreation and Open Space FundPassed
    6/7/2016
    Yes: 60.05% No: 39.95%

    Extends Park Fund to 2046, sets annual baseline, mandates equity analysis, board review, and performance audit.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 150940
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Avalos; Breed; Campos; Cohen; Farrell; Kim; Mar; Wiener; Yee
    • Noes: Peskin; Tang
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City amend the Charter to extend the Park, Recreation and Open Space Fund until 2046 and give the Recreation and Park Department each year a minimum baseline amount from the General Fund in addition to the Fund set-aside of 21/2 cents for each $100 of assessed property value?
    Summary

    Amends the San Francisco Charter to extend the Park, Recreation and Open Space Fund's term by 15 years to FY2045-2046, establishing a new annual baseline appropriation for the Recreation and Park Department which will increase annually and be subject to equity analyses, Board of Supervisors review, and performance audits.

    Description

    Amends the San Francisco Charter to extend the Park, Recreation and Open Space Fund's term by 15 years to FY2045-2046, establishing a new annual baseline appropriation for the Recreation and Park Department based on FY2015-2016 spending, which will increase by $3 million annually for ten years and then adjust with City discretionary revenues, with a provision to suspend growth during significant budget deficits. The amendment also mandates that the Department's Strategic, Capital Expenditure, and Operational Plans include equity analyses to identify and mitigate service deficiencies in low-income and disadvantaged communities, subjects these plans to Board of Supervisors review (without modification power), and requires a performance audit every four years, with potential appropriation reserves for non-compliance.

  • Prop C - Affordable Housing RequirementsPassedNotable
    6/7/2016
    Yes: 67.92% No: 32.08%

    Authorizes supervisors to update housing obligations, establishes increased interim requirements for projects, and affirms Planning Department's CEQA determination.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 151274
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Avalos; Breed; Campos; Cohen; Farrell; Kim; Mar; Peskin; Tang; Wiener; Yee
    • Noes: None
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City amend the Charter to increase affordable housing requirements for private developers of new market-rate housing projects of 25 or more units until the Board of Supervisors passes an ordinance changing those requirements and also authorize the Board of Supervisors to change affordable housing requirements by ordinance?
    Summary

    Authorizes the Board of Supervisors to update inclusionary and affordable housing obligations, establishes increased interim requirements for housing development projects in San Francisco, and affirms the Planning Department's CEQA determination for a June 7, 2016 election.

    Description

    Authorizes the Board of Supervisors to update the inclusionary and affordable housing obligations for housing development projects in San Francisco, establishes increased interim requirements for such projects, and affirms the Planning Department's determination under the California Environmental Quality Act, all for a June 7, 2016 election.

2015

November
  • Prop B - Paid Parental Leave for City EmployeesPassed
    11/3/2015
    Yes: 68.02% No: 31.98%

    Enhances paid parental leave for City employees, maximizing leave per child and retaining 40 hours of accrued sick leave.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 150524
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Avalos; Breed; Christensen; Cohen; Farrell; Kim; Mar; Tang; Wiener; Yee
    • Noes: None
    • Other: Campos
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City amend the Charter to allow parents who are both City employees to each take the maximum amount of paid parental leave for which they qualify for the birth, adoption or foster parenting of the same child, if both parents are City employees; and to provide each parent the opportunity to keep up to 40 hours of sick leave at the end of paid parental leave?
    Summary

    Amends the City and County of San Francisco Charter to enhance paid parental leave for City employees by maximizing leave per child and allowing retention of 40 hours of accrued sick leave.

    Description

    Amends the City and County of San Francisco Charter to enhance paid parental leave for City employees by allowing each qualifying employee to receive the maximum amount of paid parental leave for the birth or placement of the same child, irrespective of leave taken by another employee for the same event, and by permitting employees to retain 40 hours of accrued sick leave at the conclusion of their paid parental leave.

2014

November
  • Prop B - Adjusting Transportation Funding for Population GrowthPassed
    11/4/2014
    Yes: 61.39% No: 38.61%

    Adjusts general fund appropriations for transportation based on population increases, improving Muni and street safety.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 140556
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: London N. Breed; David Campos; David Chiu; Malia Cohen; Jane Kim; Scott Wiener
    • Noes: Mark Farrell; Eric Mar; Katy Tang; Norman Yee
    • Other: John Avalos
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City amend the Charter to increase the amount the City provides to the Municipal Transportation Agency based on increases in the City's population, with such funds to be used to improve Muni and to improve street safety?
    Summary

    Proposes a charter amendment to establish a population-based adjustment for the general fund's appropriation to the transportation fund.

    Description

    Proposes a charter amendment to establish a population-based adjustment for the general fund's appropriation directed towards the transportation fund.

  • Prop C - Children's Fund; Public Education Enrichment Fund; Children and Families Council; Rainy Day ReservePassed
    11/4/2014
    Yes: 74.44% No: 25.56%

    Extend Children's Fund (25 years), increase funding; extend Education Fund (26 years); create Families Council; divide Rainy Day Reserve.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: John Avalos, London Breed, David Campos, David Chiu, Malia Cohen, Mark Farrell, Jane Kim, Gordon Mar, Katy Tang, Scott Wiener, Norman Yee
    • Noes: None
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City amend the Charter to support services to children, youth, and their families by extending the Children's Fund for 25 years and increasing its funding; extending the Public Education Enrichment Fund for 26 years; creating an Our Children, Our Families Council; and dividing the existing Rainy Day Reserve into a City Rainy Day Reserve and a School District Rainy Day Reserve?
  • Prop D - Retiree Health Benefits for Former Redevelopment Agency and Successor Agency EmployeesPassed
    11/4/2014
    Yes: 56.13% No: 43.87%

    Addresses providing retiree health benefits to former Redevelopment Agency employees and those currently with its successor agency.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 140507
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: London N. Breed; David Campos; David Chiu; Malia Cohen; Mark Farrell; Jane Kim; Eric Mar; Katy Tang; Scott Wiener; Norman Yee
    • Noes: None
    • Other: John Avalos
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City amend the Charter to make retiree health care benefits available to certain employees of the former San Francisco Redevelopment Agency and the Successor Agency?
    Summary

    Addresses the provision of retiree health benefits for employees of both the former Redevelopment Agency and its successor agency.

    Description

    Addresses the provision of retiree health benefits for employees who previously worked for the Redevelopment Agency and those now employed by its successor agency.

2013

November
  • Prop A - Retiree Health Care Trust FundPassed
    11/5/2013
    Yes: 68.24% No: 31.76%

    Refines Retiree Health Care Trust Fund governance, limits disbursements, adds board members, and adjusts contribution rates based on funding.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 130481
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Avalos; Breed; Campos; Chiu; Cohen; Farrell; Kim; Mar; Tang; Wiener; Yee
    • Noes: None
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City change its Charter to allow payments from the Retiree Health Care Trust Fund only when the Trust Fund is fully funded or only under specified circumstances?
    Summary

    Amends the San Francisco Charter, specifically Sections 12.204 and A8.432, to refine the governance, contributions, and disbursement policies for the Retiree Health Care Trust Fund (RHCTF), establishing disbursement limits until sub-trusts are fully funded, allowing modifications to these guidelines with appropriate approvals, designating key members to the RHCTF Board, and adjusting contribution rates based on employment start dates and funding status.

    Description

    Amends the San Francisco Charter, specifically Sections 12.204 and A8.432, to refine the governance, contributions, and disbursement policies for the Retiree Health Care Trust Fund (RHCTF). The amendment establishes that RHCTF disbursements for participating employer retiree health care costs are generally limited until their respective sub-trusts are fully funded, though it permits the City's sub-trust to disburse funds even if not fully funded when the City's retiree health care costs exceed ten percent of its total payroll. It allows for modifications to these disbursement guidelines upon recommendation by the Controller, consultation with the City's Governmental Accounting Standards Board actuary, and approval by the Mayor, two-thirds of the Board of Supervisors, and the RHCTF Board, while also enabling other participating employers to adopt their own guidelines with a two-thirds vote of their governing board and RHCTF Board approval. Additionally, the amendment designates the Controller, City Treasurer, and the Executive Director of the San Francisco Employees' Retirement System, or their designees, as members of the RHCTF Board, and adjusts employee and employer contribution rates based on employment start dates and sub-trust funding status, ensuring contributions continue until sub-trusts are fully funded and without unfunded actuarial accrued liability.

2012

November
  • Prop C - Housing Trust FundPassedNotable
    11/6/2012
    Yes: 65.15% No: 34.85%

    Establishes Housing Trust Fund, dedicating revenues for affordable housing, homeownership, stabilization, and authorizes 30,000 rental units.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 120554
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Avalos; Campos; Chiu; Cohen; Kim; Mar; Christina Olague; Wiener
    • Noes: Chu; Elsbernd
    • Other: Farrell
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City amend its Charter to: create a Housing Trust Fund that supports affordable housing for low-income and moderate-income households; and change the affordable housing requirements imposed on some private residential developments?
    Summary

    Establishes a San Francisco Housing Trust Fund with dedicated general fund revenues from Fiscal Year 2013-2014 through 2042-2043 to create, acquire, and rehabilitate affordable housing, promote homeownership, double the homeownership down payment assistance fund, launch a housing stabilization program, create an infrastructure grant program, reduce on-site inclusionary housing obligations, stabilize future affordable housing fees, and authorize the development of up to 30,000 affordable rental units.

    Description

    Establishes a San Francisco Housing Trust Fund, dedicating general fund revenues from Fiscal Year 2013-2014 through 2042-2043, starting at $20 million and increasing to over $50 million annually, to create, acquire, and rehabilitate affordable housing and promote homeownership for households up to 120% of Area Median Income. This amendment also doubles the homeownership down payment assistance fund to $30 million, launches a housing stabilization program, and creates an infrastructure grant program to support residential growth. Furthermore, it reduces the on-site inclusionary housing obligation for most new private residential projects by 20% (not below a basic requirement) and stabilizes future affordable housing fees and cost obligations at January 2013 levels, while authorizing the development of up to 30,000 affordable rental units under Article 34 of the California Constitution.

  • Prop D - Consolidating Odd-Year Municipal ElectionsPassed
    11/6/2012
    Yes: 83.20% No: 16.80%

    Aligning City Attorney and Treasurer elections with major offices, shifting primary election frequency to even years.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 111330
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Avalos; Campos; Chiu; Chu; Cohen; Elsbernd; Farrell; Kim; Mar; Olague; Wiener
    • Noes: None
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City amend its Charter to change the election cycle for City Attorney and Treasurer so that these officers would be elected at the same time as the Mayor, Sheriff and District Attorney?
    Summary

    Revises the City and County of San Francisco Charter to align election cycles for the City Attorney and Treasurer with other major offices, redefining "general municipal election" to primarily occur in even-numbered years.

    Description

    Revises the City and County of San Francisco Charter to adjust municipal election cycles by amending Sections 2.101, 13.101, and Article XVII. The amendment shifts the election schedule for the City Attorney and Treasurer, moving their initial election to a two-year term in 2013, followed by four-year terms starting in 2015, thereby aligning their election cycle with that of the Mayor, District Attorney, and Sheriff. Furthermore, it redefines "general municipal election" to occur in all even-numbered years and in every fourth year following 2015, effectively transitioning the primary election frequency from odd to even years while maintaining specific odd-year elections.

2011

November
  • Prop C - City Pension and Healthcare BenefitsPassed
    11/8/2011
    Yes: 68.91% No: 31.09%

    Adjusts employee/employer retirement and healthcare contributions, limits retiree COLAs, creates new pension plans, and modifies board composition.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 110058
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Avalos; Campos; Chiu; Chu; Cohen; Elsbernd; Farrell; Kim; Mar; Mirkarimi; Wiener
    • Noes: None
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City amend its Charter to adjust pension contribution rates for most current and future City employees based on the City's costs; reduce pension benefits for future City employees; limit cost-of-living adjustments to pension benefits; decrease City contributions to retiree health care costs for certain former employees; require all current and future employees to contribute toward their retiree healthcare costs; change the composition and voting requirements of the Health Service Board; and make other changes to the City's retirement and health benefits systems?
    Summary

    Amends the City's Charter to overhaul retirement and health care benefits by adjusting contribution rates, limiting cost-of-living adjustments, establishing new retirement plans, mandating elected officials' contributions, permitting certain CalPERS members to join SFERS, modifying the Health Service Board's composition and voting requirements, and restricting retiree health benefits for non-retired former employees while reducing employer contributions under specific conditions.

    Description

    Amends the City's Charter to overhaul retirement and health care benefits, primarily by adjusting employee and employer contribution rates to the San Francisco Employees' Retirement System (SFERS) and the Retiree Health Care Trust Fund (RHCTF) based on financial health, limiting supplemental cost-of-living adjustments for retirees, and establishing new retirement plans for employees commencing employment on or after January 7, 2012. The amendment further mandates elected officials' contributions to SFERS and RHCTF, permits certain CalPERS members to join SFERS, modifies the Health Service Board's (HSB) composition and voting requirements for health plan approvals, and restricts retiree health benefits for non-retired former employees to those in effect at their departure, while also reducing employer contributions to the Health Service System Trust Fund under specific conditions.

  • Prop D - City Pension BenefitsFailed
    11/8/2011
    Yes: 33.45% No: 66.55%

    Amends City Charter, overhauling retirement, health care benefits; adjusting contributions, limiting cost-of-living increases, establishing new retirement plans, mandating elected official contributions.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 110058
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Avalos; Campos; Chiu; Chu; Cohen; Elsbernd; Farrell; Kim; Mar; Mirkarimi; Wiener
    • Noes: None
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City amend its Charter to increase pension contribution rates for most current City employees based on the City's costs; reduce contribution rates and pension benefits for most future City employees; limit cost-of-living adjustments to pension benefits; prohibit the City from picking up any employee's contribution for pension benefits; and make other changes to the City's retirement system?
    Summary

    Amends the City's Charter to overhaul retirement and health care benefits by adjusting contribution rates, limiting cost-of-living adjustments, establishing new retirement plans, mandating elected officials' contributions, permitting certain CalPERS members to join SFERS, modifying the Health Service Board's composition and voting, and restricting retiree health benefits for non-retired former employees while reducing employer contributions under specific conditions.

    Description

    Amends the City's Charter to overhaul retirement and health care benefits, primarily by adjusting employee and employer contribution rates to the San Francisco Employees' Retirement System (SFERS) and the Retiree Health Care Trust Fund (RHCTF) based on financial health, limiting supplemental cost-of-living adjustments for retirees, and establishing new retirement plans for employees commencing employment on or after January 7, 2012. The amendment further mandates elected officials' contributions to SFERS and RHCTF, permits certain CalPERS members to join SFERS, modifies the Health Service Board's (HSB) composition and voting requirements for health plan approvals, and restricts retiree health benefits for non-retired former employees to those in effect at their departure, while also reducing employer contributions to the Health Service System Trust Fund under specific conditions.

  • Prop E - Amending or Repealing Legislative Initiative Ordinances and Declarations of PolicyFailed
    11/8/2011
    Yes: 32.87% No: 67.13%

    Revise amending/repealing initiative ordinances; voter approval required for citizen initiatives; legislative initiatives have new timelines, votes.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 110401
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Chiu; Chu; Cohen; Elsbernd; Farrell; Kim; Wiener
    • Noes: Avalos; Campos; Mar; Mirkarimi
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City amend its Charter to allow the Board of Supervisors and the Mayor to amend or repeal initiative ordinances and declarations of policy that the Board of Supervisors or the Mayor place on the ballot and that the voters approve after January 1, 2012?
    Summary

    Amends San Francisco Charter Section 14.101 to revise the process for amending or repealing initiative ordinances, requiring voter approval for voter-proposed initiatives unless specified otherwise, while legislative initiatives approved post-2012 gain new amendment and repeal pathways, with specific timelines and requirements for Board or Mayoral action.

    Description

    Amends San Francisco Charter Section 14.101 to revise the process for amending or repealing initiative ordinances and declarations of policy. While voter-proposed initiatives continue to require voter approval for amendment or repeal unless the initiative itself specifies otherwise, legislative initiatives—those proposed by the Board of Supervisors or the Mayor—approved on or after January 1, 2012, gain new amendment and repeal pathways. Specifically, these post-2012 legislative initiatives cannot be amended or repealed by the Board or Mayor for three years after their effective date, requiring voter action during this period. From three to seven years post-effective date, the Board and Mayor may amend or repeal them by ordinance with a two-thirds vote of all Board members. After seven years, the Board and Mayor retain the power to amend or repeal by ordinance. All such amendments by the Board or Mayor must include findings demonstrating how they further the original initiative's purposes.

2010

November
  • Prop B - City Retirement and Health PlansFailed
    11/2/2010
    Yes: 43.04% No: 56.96%

    Increase employee retirement contributions, decrease employer health contributions, and change rules for collective bargaining arbitration.

    Origin: Signatures
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City increase employee contributions to the Retirement System for retirement benefits; decrease employer contributions to the Health Service System for heath benefits for employees, retirees and their dependents; and change rules for arbitration proceedings about City collective bargaining agreements?
  • Prop C - Mayoral Appearances at Board MeetingsPassed
    11/2/2010
    Yes: 59.89% No: 40.11%

    Mandates Mayor attend monthly Board of Supervisors meetings for policy discussions, empowering Board to establish rules for appearances.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 100630
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Avalos; Campos; Chiu; Daly; Mar; Mirkarimi
    • Noes: Alioto-Pier; Chu; Dufty; Elsbernd; Maxwell
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the Charter be amended to require the Mayor to appear in person at one regularly scheduled meeting of the Board of Supervisors each month to engage in formal policy discussions with the Board?
    Summary

    Amends the San Francisco City and County Charter to require the Mayor to attend monthly Board of Supervisors meetings for policy discussions and empowers the Board to establish rules for these appearances in consultation with the Mayor.

    Description

    Amends the San Francisco City and County Charter to mandate that the Mayor personally attend one regularly-scheduled Board of Supervisors meeting each month for formal policy discussions with Board members, and further empowers the Board of Supervisors to establish, in consultation with the Mayor, rules and guidelines by ordinance for the conduct of these mayoral appearances.

  • Prop D - Non-Citizen Voting in School Board ElectionsFailed
    11/2/2010
    Yes: 45.09% No: 54.91%

    Authorize non-citizen parents/guardians with children in SF School District to vote in Board of Education elections until 2016.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 100635
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Alioto-Pier; Avalos; Campos; Chiu; Daly; Dufty; Mar; Maxwell; Mirkarimi
    • Noes: Chu; Elsbernd
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City allow non-citizen residents of San Francisco who are 18 years of age or older and have children living in the San Francisco Unified School District to vote for members of the Board of Education?
    Summary

    Establishes a charter amendment allowing San Francisco residents over 18 who are parents, legal guardians, or caregivers of children in the San Francisco Unified School District to vote in Board of Education elections, regardless of U.S. citizenship, with a sunset clause for the non-citizen voting provision set to expire on December 31, 2016, or after the third Board of Education election.

    Description

    Establishes a charter amendment authorizing San Francisco residents aged 18 or older who are parents, legal guardians, or caregivers of children in the San Francisco Unified School District to vote in Board of Education elections, irrespective of U.S. citizenship, provided they are not in prison or on parole for a felony. This amendment, which allows the Board of Supervisors to adopt implementing ordinances, includes a sunset clause, causing the non-citizen voting provision to expire on December 31, 2016, or after the third Board of Education election conducted under this section, whichever is later, after which the Board of Supervisors may re-authorize it by ordinance, without altering the general definition of "elector" or "voter" for other elections.

  • Prop E - Election Day Voter RegistrationFailed
    11/2/2010
    Yes: 47.21% No: 52.79%

    Establishes Election Day Voter Registration for municipal elections, allowing eligible voters to register and vote on Election Day.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 100267
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Avalos; Campos; Chiu; Chu; Daly; Dufty; Mar; Maxwell; Mirkarimi
    • Noes: Alioto-Pier; Elsbernd
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the Charter be amended to establish Election Day voter registration specifically for municipal elections?
    Summary

    Establishes Election Day Voter Registration for San Francisco's municipal elections, allowing eligible voters to register and vote on Election Day, and amends the Charter to enable local registration distinct from state law.

    Description

    Establishes Election Day Voter Registration for San Francisco's exclusively municipal elections, allowing eligible voters to register and cast a ballot on any day up to and including Election Day for General Municipal Elections or Special Municipal Elections not consolidated with statewide contests. The amendment adds Section 13.112 to the Charter, requiring the Board of Supervisors to create ordinances for these procedures in consultation with the Director of Elections, and concurrently amends Article XVII to redefine "Voter" to include those registered under municipal law, thereby enabling local registration processes distinct from state law.

  • Prop F - Health Service Board ElectionsPassed
    11/2/2010
    Yes: 53.32% No: 46.68%

    Modifies Health Service Board member terms to align future expirations in pairs for streamlined elections.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 100634
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Alioto-Pier; Avalos; Campos; Chiu; Chu; Dufty; Elsbernd; Maxwell; Mirkarimi
    • Noes: Daly; Mar
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the number of Health Service Board elections be reduced to two elections every five years instead of four elections?
    Summary

    Amends Section 12.200 of the San Francisco Charter to modify the terms of two Health Service Board members on a one-time basis, shortening specified terms to ensure future term expirations align in pairs for streamlined elections.

    Description

    Amends Section 12.200 of the San Francisco Charter to modify the terms of two Health Service Board members on a one-time basis, specifically shortening the term of the member beginning in May 2011 from five years to three years (expiring May 2014), and the term of the member beginning in May 2013 from five years to two years (expiring May 2015). This adjustment aims to ensure that Health Service Board terms expire in pairs, allowing for two seats to be filled during the same Board election in the future, thereby streamlining the election process.

  • Prop G - Transit Operator WagesPassedNotable
    11/2/2010
    Yes: 64.94% No: 35.06%

    Eliminates MUNI operator wage formula, setting wages via collective bargaining, binding arbitration, and adding rules for transit employees.

    Origin: Signatures
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City eliminate the formula for setting minimum MUNI operator wages and instead set MUNI operator wages through collective bargaining and binding arbitration; add rules for arbitration proceedings regarding MTA's transit employees; and make other changes to terms of employment for MTA employees?
June
  • Prop C - Film CommissionFailed
    6/8/2010
    Yes: 46.25% No: 53.75%

    Establishes Film Commission, promotes film activities, issues permits for production on City property and public rights-of-way.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 91429
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Campos; Chiu; Chu; Daly; Dufty; Elsbernd; Mar; Maxwell; Mirkarimi
    • Noes: None
    • Other: Alioto-Pier; Avalos
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the Charter be amended to require the City to have a Film Commission consisting of five members appointed by the Board of Supervisors and six members appointed by the Mayor, with the final authority to issue permits to film in San Francisco?
    Summary

    Establishes the San Francisco Film Commission under Section 5.107 of the City Charter to develop, promote, and recognize film activities, with the authority to issue permits for film production on City property and public rights-of-way.

    Description

    Establishes the San Francisco Film Commission under Section 5.107 of the City Charter, comprising eleven members serving four-year terms, with six nominated by the Mayor and five by the Board of Supervisors' Rules Committee, ensuring diverse representation from the film industry, neighborhood organizations, film workers, and educators. The Commission's primary purpose is to develop, promote, and recognize film activities, fostering filmmaking as a key economic and cultural component of the City. Its powers include appointing an Executive Director and, crucially, the authority to issue permits for film production on City property and public rights-of-way, with provisions for departmental consent for specific properties and an appeal process for denied permits, where the Commission's decision is final.

  • Prop D - Retirement Benefit CostsPassed
    6/8/2010
    Yes: 78.77% No: 21.23%

    Revising retirement benefits, mandating RHCTF deposits, increasing new employee contributions to nine percent, and requiring two-year compensation calculation.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 100156
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Avalos; Campos; Chiu; Chu; Dufty; Elsbernd; Mar; Maxwell; Mirkarimi
    • Noes: Daly
    • Other: Alioto-Pier
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City: calculate retirement benefits for new City employees using average monthly compensation over two years instead of over one year; increase the retirement benefit employee contribution for new safety employees and new employees in positions covered by the State retirement system; and require that savings from reduced employer contributions to the City's retirement system be deposited in the Retiree Health Care Trust Fund?
    Summary

    Amends the San Francisco Charter to revise employer and employee retirement benefits and contributions by expanding "Participating Employers" for the RHCTF, mandating deposits into the RHCTF, establishing a nine percent employee contribution rate for new CalPERS members hired on or after July 1, 2010, requiring two-year final compensation calculations for new hires, ensuring cost-neutrality for certain CalPERS contracts, and creating new retirement plans with increased contributions and a two-year average final compensation formula for miscellaneous officers and safety members hired on or after July 1, 2010.

    Description

    Amends the San Francisco Charter to revise employer and employee retirement benefits and contributions, specifically by: (1) expanding the definition of "Participating Employers" for the Retiree Health Care Trust Fund (RHCTF) to include the Superior Court upon board resolution; (2) mandating the deposit of the difference between the City and County's San Francisco Employees' Retirement System (SFERS) contribution and the employer normal cost rate into the RHCTF, with similar deposits from "Participating Employers" requiring their board's approval; (3) establishing a nine percent employee contribution rate for all new California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) members hired on or after July 1, 2010; (4) requiring CalPERS contracts for new hires to use a two-year final compensation calculation; (5) ensuring cost-neutrality for new Sheriff's Department and Housing Authority Police CalPERS contracts; and (6) creating new retirement plans for miscellaneous officers and safety members hired on or after July 1, 2010, which increase their required contributions to nine percent and shift their average final compensation calculation from a one-year to a two-year formula.

2009

November
  • Prop A - Budget ProcessPassed
    11/4/2009
    Yes: 69.89% No: 30.11%

    Institutes rolling two-year budget, allows fixed cycle conversion, sets deadlines, mandates financial plan, permits Controller fund certification.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 90622
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Avalos; Campos; Chiu; Dufty; Mar; Maxwell; Mirkarimi
    • Noes: Alioto-Pier; Chu; Daly; Elsbernd
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City: establish a two-year budget cycle; be required to adopt a five-year financial plan; be required to adopt long-range financial policies and require that the budget comply with these policies; permit the Controller to certify the availability of funds for a contract if the Controller determines funds will be available when due; change deadlines for submitting and adopting labor agreements; and allow the Board to decide how to publish required public notices?
    Summary

    Institutes a "rolling" two-year budgetary cycle for the City and County of San Francisco, allowing for conversion to a "fixed" cycle for specific departments, while also imposing deadlines for employment terms, mandating a five-year financial plan, granting the Board of Supervisors authority to define publication requirements, and permitting the Controller to certify fund availability throughout the budgetary cycle.

    Description

    Institutes a "rolling" two-year budgetary cycle for the City and County of San Francisco, where a new two-year budget is adopted annually, while also allowing the Board of Supervisors to convert this to a "fixed" two-year cycle for specific departments, meaning the budget remains in effect for two years. The amendment further imposes a May 10 or May 15 deadline for submitting new employment terms and conditions (MOUs) for miscellaneous and safety employees to the Board of Supervisors for the upcoming fiscal year. It also mandates the adoption of a five-year financial plan and binding long-range financial policies. Additionally, it grants the Board of Supervisors authority to define, by ordinance, how City departments will meet Charter publication requirements and permits the Controller to certify fund availability based on the expectation that funds will become available throughout the budgetary cycle.

  • Prop B - Board of Supervisors AidesPassed
    11/4/2009
    Yes: 52.26% No: 47.74%

    Eliminates mandated provision for two staff members per Supervisor, removing explicit numerical reference to supervisory staff.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 80618
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Michela Alioto-Pier; Tom Ammiano; Chris Daly; Bevan Dufty; Sophie Maxwell; Jake McGoldrick; Ross Mirkarimi; Aaron Peskin; Gerardo Sandoval
    • Noes: Carmen Chu; Sean Elsbernd
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City eliminate from its Charter the requirement that each member of the Board of Supervisors have two aides?
    Summary

    Amends Section 2.117 of the City and County of San Francisco Charter by removing the explicit numerical reference to supervisory staff by eliminating the previous mandate of two staff members per Board of Supervisors member.

    Description

    Amends Section 2.117 of the City and County of San Francisco Charter by eliminating the specific provision that previously mandated each member of the Board of Supervisors have two staff members, thereby removing the explicit numerical reference to supervisory staff from the charter.

2008

November
  • Prop B - Establishing Affordable Housing FundFailed
    11/4/2008
    Yes: 47.81% No: 52.19%

    Establishes Affordable Housing Fund, dedicating property tax set-aside to increase support for predevelopment, acquisition, and construction.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 71218
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Ammiano; Daly; Dufty; Maxwell; McGoldrick; Mirkarimi; Peskin; Sandoval
    • Noes: Alioto-Pier; Chu; Elsbernd
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City establish an Affordable Housing Fund; set aside from the property tax 2 1/2 cents for every $100 of assessed value for this Fund through 2024; and use this Fund subject to public review, to acquire and develop new affordable housing units meeting certain priorities and income limitations?
    Summary

    Establishes the San Francisco Affordable Housing Fund, administered by the Mayor's Office of Housing, to significantly increase City support for affordable housing programs by dedicating an annual set-aside from property taxes for 15 years, supplementing existing efforts for affordable housing development, maintenance, homeownership, and eviction prevention for low-income households, with a mandated triennial housing plan and annual budget subject to Board of Supervisors approval, set to expire on July 1, 2024, unless reauthorized.

    Description

    Establishes the San Francisco Affordable Housing Fund, administered by the Mayor's Office of Housing, to significantly increase City support for affordable housing programs. This is achieved by dedicating an annual set-aside equivalent to 2.5 cents per $100 of assessed property tax valuation for 15 years, starting in fiscal year 2009-10, explicitly as an *addition* to existing affordable housing appropriations. Funds are primarily for the predevelopment, acquisition, construction, maintenance, and rehabilitation of housing affordable for at least 99 years to households earning up to 80% of the San Francisco Median Income, with specific priorities for lower-income households and larger units, and also support homeownership, rent subsidies, and eviction prevention. The amendment mandates a triennial housing plan and annual budget, subject to Board of Supervisors approval, ensures these new funds supplement rather than replace existing efforts, and affirms the Redevelopment Agency's commitment to affordable housing. This section is set to expire on July 1, 2024, unless reauthorized by voters.

  • Prop C - Prohibiting City Employees from Serving on Charter Boards and CommissionsFailed
    11/4/2008
    Yes: 38.06% No: 61.94%

    Prohibit City employees from serving on most Charter boards/commissions, exempting specified advisory, library, retirement, election, and ethics bodies.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 80645
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Michela Alioto-Pier; Tom Ammiano; Carmen Chu; Chris Daly; Sean Elsbernd; Jake McGoldrick; Ross Mirkarimi; Aaron Peskin; Gerardo Sandoval
    • Noes: Bevan Dufty; Sophie Maxwell
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City prohibit City employees from serving on most Charter created boards and commissions?
    Summary

    Prohibits City employees from serving on appointive boards or commissions established by the San Francisco Charter, with explicit exemptions for citizen advisory committees, the Law Library Board of Trustees, and boards or commissions created under specific Charter Articles (V, XII, XIII, and XV), and allows City officers to serve as ex officio members when mandated.

    Description

    Prohibits City employees from serving on appointive boards or commissions established by the San Francisco Charter, amending Section 4.101 to introduce this new restriction. This prohibition, however, explicitly exempts service on citizen advisory committees, the Law Library Board of Trustees, and boards or commissions created under Charter Articles V (Arts and Culture), XII (Employee Retirement and Health Service Systems), XIII (Elections), and XV (Ethics), while also allowing City officers to serve as ex officio members of Charter Commissions when mandated by the Charter.

  • Prop D - Financing Pier 70 Waterfront District Development Plan upon Board of Supervisors' ApprovalPassed
    11/4/2008
    Yes: 68.07% No: 31.93%

    Authorizes Pier 70 development plan, allocates new tax revenue for waterfront improvements, streamlines leases, and prioritizes Port revenue expenditure.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 80641
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Michela Alioto-Pier; Tom Ammiano; Carmen Chu; Chris Daly; Bevan Dufty; Sean Elsbernd; Sophie Maxwell; Jake McGoldrick; Ross Mirkarimi; Aaron Peskin; Gerardo Sandoval
    • Noes: None
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City provide funds to develop Pier 70, based on new City hotel and payroll expenses tax revenues from the development, if the Board of Supervisors approves a financial and land use plan for Pier 70?
    Summary

    Establishes new Charter Sections B7.310 and B7.320, and amends Section B6.406, to enable the rehabilitation and development of the Pier 70 waterfront by authorizing the Board of Supervisors to approve a Pier 70 financial and land use plan, allowing the City to appropriate up to 75% of projected hotel and payroll taxes for waterfront improvements, streamlining lease approvals, and updating priorities for Port revenue expenditures.

    Description

    Establishes new Charter Sections B7.310 and B7.320, and amends Section B6.406, primarily to enable the rehabilitation and development of the Pier 70 waterfront. The amendment authorizes the Board of Supervisors to approve a Pier 70 financial and land use plan, and permits the City to appropriate up to 75% of projected hotel and payroll taxes generated by new Pier 70 development from the General Fund to finance waterfront improvements, provided other Port revenues are insufficient, for up to 20 years. It also streamlines the lease approval process for projects consistent with an approved Pier 70 plan by waiving Board approval under specified conditions, and requires the City to appropriate funds for Board-approved interagency agreements involving the Port Commission. Additionally, the amendment updates and clarifies the priorities for the expenditure of Port revenues, including various forms of indebtedness and capital improvements, ensuring that debt instrument priorities prevail in case of conflict.

  • Prop E - Changing the Number of Signatures to Recall City OfficialsPassedNotable
    11/4/2008
    Yes: 60.10% No: 39.90%

    Increases signatures required to qualify a recall petition for a Board of Supervisors member from 10 percent to 20 percent.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 80642
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Michela Alioto-Pier; Tom Ammiano; Chris Daly; Bevan Dufty; Sophie Maxwell; Jake McGoldrick; Ross Mirkarimi
    • Noes: Carmen Chu; Sean Elsbernd; Aaron Peskin; Gerardo Sandoval
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City adopt state law signature requirements for petitions to recall City officials?
    Summary

    Increases the required signatures for a Board of Supervisors recall petition from 10 percent to 20 percent of registered voters in their district.

    Description

    Increases the number of signatures required to qualify a recall petition for a member of the Board of Supervisors from 10 percent to 20 percent of the registered voters in their respective district.

  • Prop F - Holding All Scheduled City Elections Only in Even-Numbered YearsFailed
    11/4/2008
    Yes: 45.00% No: 55.00%

    Transition Mayor, Sheriff, District Attorney, City Attorney, Treasurer elections to even-numbered years; institutes one-time five-year terms.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 80643
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Daly; Dufty; Maxwell; McGoldrick; Peskin; Sandoval
    • Noes: Alioto-Pier; Ammiano; Chu; Elsbernd; Mirkarimi
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City shift all City elections except special elections to even-numbered years after the November 2011 election?
    Summary

    Amends the San Francisco City Charter to transition the election cycle for the Mayor, Sheriff, District Attorney, City Attorney, and Treasurer from odd-numbered to even-numbered years, aligning all general municipal elections to occur exclusively in even-numbered years after 2011, and institutes a one-time five-year term for those elected in 2009 and 2011, which counts as a single term for limit purposes.

    Description

    Amends the San Francisco City Charter to transition the election cycle for the Mayor, Sheriff, District Attorney, City Attorney, and Treasurer from odd-numbered to even-numbered years, aligning all general municipal elections to occur exclusively in even-numbered years after 2011. To achieve this shift, the amendment institutes a one-time five-year term for the Mayor, Sheriff, and District Attorney elected in 2011, and for the City Attorney and Treasurer elected in 2009, with these extended terms counting as a single term for the purpose of term limits.

  • Prop G - Allowing Retirement System Credit for Unpaid Parental LeavePassed
    11/4/2008
    Yes: 62.47% No: 37.53%

    Allowing retirement system members to purchase service credit for unpaid parental leave taken prior to July 2003.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 80639
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Michela Alioto-Pier; Tom Ammiano; Carmen Chu; Chris Daly; Bevan Dufty; Sophie Maxwell; Jake McGoldrick; Ross Mirkarimi; Gerardo Sandoval
    • Noes: Sean Elsbernd; Aaron Peskin
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City allow City employees to purchase retirement system credit for unpaid parental leave taken before July 1, 2003, as long as the purchase price covers all City costs?
    Summary

    Establishes a new provision in the San Francisco City and County Charter, Section A8.523, allowing eligible retirement system members to purchase service credit for periods of unpaid parental leave taken prior to July 1, 2003, with all costs borne solely by the member and without financial impact on the City and County, while integrating this benefit into existing charter sections and explicitly stating its non-vested nature for those who retired or separated before its effective date.

    Description

    Establishes a new provision in the San Francisco City and County Charter, Section A8.523, allowing eligible retirement system members to purchase service credit for periods of unpaid parental leave taken prior to July 1, 2003. This amendment permits members to buy a maximum of four months of credit per leave period, provided they returned to work for at least six months post-leave, with all costs for purchasing this credit borne solely by the member to ensure no financial impact on the City and County. Concurrently, various existing charter sections (e.g., A8.509, A8.559-10) are amended to integrate this new service credit into computation and funding mechanisms, explicitly stating that this benefit is non-vested and does not apply to those who retired or separated before its effective date.

  • Prop H - Setting Clean Energy Deadlines; Studying Options for Providing Energy: Changing Revenue Bond Authority to Pay for Public Utility FacilitiesFailed
    11/4/2008
    Yes: 38.65% No: 61.35%

    Accelerate clean energy transition, mandate PUC meet 100% renewable goal, create Ratepayer Advocate, streamline utility bond issuance.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 80648
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano; Chris Daly; Bevan Dufty; Sophie Maxwell; Ross Mirkarimi; Aaron Peskin; Gerardo Sandoval
    • Noes: Michela Alioto-Pier; Carmen Chu; Sean Elsbernd; Jake McGoldrick
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City: evaluate making the City the primary provider of electric power in San Francisco; consider options to provide energy to San Francisco residents, businesses and City departments; mandate deadlines for the City to meet its energy needs through clean and renewable energy sources; establish a new Office of the Independent Ratepayer Advocate to make recommendations about utility rates to the City's Public Utilities Commission; and allow the Board of Supervisors to approve the issuance of revenue bonds to pay for any public utility facilities without voter approval?
    Summary

    Amends San Francisco's Charter to accelerate the transition to clean, sustainable energy by establishing aggressive mandates for the Public Utilities Commission to meet the City's electricity needs with clean and renewable resources, aiming for 100% by 2040 or the greatest feasible amount, while also creating an Independent Ratepayer Advocate, enhancing financial independence, streamlining bond issuance for utility improvements, and protecting incumbent staff employment rights during any transition.

    Description

    Amends San Francisco's Charter to accelerate the transition to clean, sustainable energy by establishing aggressive mandates for the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) to meet the City's electricity needs with clean and renewable resources, aiming for 100% by 2040 or the greatest feasible amount, and requiring comprehensive planning for energy infrastructure, including potential municipalization of the electric system. The amendment further creates an Independent Ratepayer Advocate to scrutinize PUC rate proposals and operations from a ratepayer perspective, enhances the PUC's financial independence, and streamlines the issuance of revenue bonds for utility improvements, especially for renewable energy and existing water/electric facilities, while also protecting the employment rights of incumbent utility staff during any transition.

  • Prop I - Creating the Office of an Independent Rate Payer AdvocateFailed
    11/4/2008
    Yes: 36.71% No: 63.29%

    Establishes OIRA to evaluate, analyze, and recommend utility rate proposals, reviewing SFPUC operations, engaging ratepayers.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 80638
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Michela Alioto-Pier; Tom Ammiano; Carmen Chu; Bevan Dufty; Sean Elsbernd; Sophie Maxwell; Jake McGoldrick; Gerardo Sandoval
    • Noes: Chris Daly; Ross Mirkarimi; Aaron Peskin
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City create an Office of the Independent Ratepayer Advocate to make recommendations about utility rates to the City's Public Utilities Commission?
    Summary

    Establishes the Office of the Independent Ratepayer Advocate (OIRA) within the San Francisco Charter, tasked with independently evaluating and providing recommendations on utility rate proposals, reviewing SFPUC's operations, engaging with ratepayers, and being funded by utility rate revenues with mandated SFPUC cooperation.

    Description

    Establishes the Office of the Independent Ratepayer Advocate (OIRA) within the San Francisco Charter, tasked with independently evaluating, analyzing, and providing recommendations on the efficiency, equity, and fiscal feasibility of utility rate proposals from the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) from a ratepayer perspective. The OIRA, led by an advocate appointed by the City Administrator with specific utility and rate experience, will also review SFPUC's contracts, investments, and operations, hold public meetings, engage with ratepayers, and participate in relevant public discussions with equal speaking time as SFPUC staff. The SFPUC is mandated to cooperate by providing access to information, and the OIRA's costs will be funded by utility rate revenues, though non-compliance with this section does not invalidate adopted rates.

  • Prop J - Creating a Historic Preservation CommissionPassedNotable
    11/4/2008
    Yes: 55.64% No: 44.36%

    Establishes independent Historic Preservation Commission, recommending landmark/historic district designations, approving appropriateness certificates, permitting alterations, reviewing environmental impacts, overseeing surveys, and recommending contracts.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 80650
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Michela Alioto-Pier; Tom Ammiano; Carmen Chu; Chris Daly; Bevan Dufty; Sean Elsbernd; Sophie Maxwell; Jake McGoldrick; Ross Mirkarimi; Aaron Peskin; Gerardo Sandoval
    • Noes: None
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City establish a seven-member Historic Preservation Commission and give it authority over historic preservation-related decisions in the City?
    Summary

    Establishes an independent Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) by amending the San Francisco Charter, creating a seven-member body with professional qualifications to assume the duties of the former Landmarks Preservation Advisory Board, recommending landmark and historic district designations, approving Certificates of Appropriateness, permitting alterations, recommending a Preservation Element for the General Plan, reviewing environmental impacts, overseeing historic property surveys, and recommending historical property contracts, all with defined appeal processes and clarified relationships with other commissions.

    Description

    Establishes an independent Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) by amending the San Francisco Charter, creating a seven-member body appointed by the Mayor and approved by the Board of Supervisors, with specific professional qualifications in historic preservation fields. This new commission assumes the duties of the former Landmarks Preservation Advisory Board and is empowered to recommend landmark and historic district designations to the Board of Supervisors (with Planning Commission comment for districts), approve or modify Certificates of Appropriateness for work on designated landmarks and historic districts, and permits for alterations to significant or contributory buildings. The HPC also recommends a Preservation Element for the General Plan, reviews environmental impacts on historic resources, oversees historic property surveys, and recommends historical property contracts, with defined appeal processes and a clarified relationship with the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors regarding these matters.

June
  • Prop B - Changing Qualifications for Retiree Health and Pension Benefits and Establishing a Retiree Health Care Trust FundPassed
    6/3/2008
    Yes: 74.05% No: 25.95%

    Alters retirement, health benefits for new/re-hired employees, establishing new plans and a Health Care Trust Fund.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 71663
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Michela Alioto-Pier; Tom Ammiano; Carmen Chu; Chris Daly; Sean Elsbernd; Sophie Maxwell; Jake McGoldrick; Ross Mirkarimi; Aaron Peskin; Gerardo Sandoval
    • Noes: None
    • Other: Bevan Dufty
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City increase the years of service required for new City employees and certain employees of the School District, the Superior Court and the Community College District to qualify for employer-funded retiree health benefits, establish a separate Retiree Health Care Trust Fund to fund retiree health care costs, and increase retirement benefits and retirement cost-of-living adjustments for certain City employees?
    Summary

    Revises the City and County of San Francisco's Charter to significantly alter retirement and retiree health benefits, primarily for new and rehired employees by establishing new retirement plans, increasing service requirements for subsidized health benefits, mandating new employee contributions to a Retiree Health Care Trust Fund, integrating rehired employees into existing plans, and including provisions for benefit forfeiture.

    Description

    Revises the City and County of San Francisco's Charter to significantly alter retirement and retiree health benefits, primarily for new and rehired employees. The amendment establishes a new, distinct retirement plan for employees hired on or after January 10, 2009, who are new to the system, outlining their service and disability retirement allowances, death benefits, and requiring a 7% employee contribution, while ensuring these new rules do not apply to pre-existing members. For employees hired on or after July 1, 2008, it increases service requirements for subsidized retiree health benefits and implements a tiered employer contribution model based on years of service, while also mandating new employee contributions to a newly created Retiree Health Care Trust Fund. This Trust Fund is designed to pre-fund future retiree health obligations, partly financed by reallocating 25% of the General Fund's 'excess revenues' from the Rainy Day Reserve. The amendment also integrates certain rehired City employees into existing retirement plans and includes provisions for benefit forfeiture due to crimes of moral turpitude.

  • Prop C - Forfeiture of Retirement Benefits for Conviction of a Crime Involving Moral Turpitude in Connection with City EmploymentPassed
    6/3/2008
    Yes: 58.07% No: 41.93%

    Mandates forfeiture of employer-funded retirement benefits for employees convicted of crime involving moral turpitude; personal contributions retained.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 71664
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Michela Alioto-Pier; Tom Ammiano; Carmen Chu; Bevan Dufty; Sean Elsbernd; Sophie Maxwell; Jake McGoldrick; Ross Mirkarimi; Aaron Peskin; Gerardo Sandoval
    • Noes: Chris Daly
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City prohibit San Francisco Employees' Retirement System members who are convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude in connection with their employment from receiving and retirement benefits funded with employer contributions
    Summary

    Establishes a clear forfeiture policy for City and County of San Francisco employees, including those from the school district, college district, and Superior Court, who are convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude connected to their official duties, mandating the forfeiture of all employer-funded retirement benefits while ensuring they retain their own accumulated contributions.

    Description

    Establishes a clear forfeiture policy for City and County of San Francisco employees, including those from the school district, college district, and Superior Court, who are convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude connected to their official duties. This amendment mandates the forfeiture of all employer-funded retirement benefits for such individuals, whether active or already retired and receiving payments, while ensuring they retain their own accumulated contributions. Specifically, active members eligible for service retirement or those already retired may elect to receive an annuity solely based on their personal contributions, with future employer-funded payments ceasing immediately upon conviction for retired members.

  • Prop D - Appointment to City Boards and CommissionsPassed
    6/3/2008
    Yes: 59.00% No: 41.00%

    Establishes policy for diverse representation on boards, commissions, tracking appointments of female, minority, and disabled candidates biennially.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 71591
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Michela Alioto-Pier; Tom Ammiano; Carmen Chu; Chris Daly; Bevan Dufty; Sean Elsbernd; Sophie Maxwell; Jake McGoldrick; Ross Mirkarimi; Aaron Peskin; Gerardo Sandoval
    • Noes: None
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall it be City policy that the membership of City boards and commissions reflect the interests and contributions of both men and women of all races, ethnicities, sexual orientations and types of disabilities and that City officers and agencies support the nomination, appointment or confirmation of female, minority and disabled candidates to fill seats on these bodies?
    Summary

    Amends the City Charter to establish an official policy for diverse representation on all appointive boards, commissions, and advisory bodies, urging consideration for female, minority, and disabled candidates and mandating the Commission on the Status of Women to track diversity appointments biennially.

    Description

    Amends the City Charter to establish an official policy that all appointive boards, commissions, and advisory bodies broadly reflect the City's diversity, including ethnicity, race, age, sexual orientation, and various types of disabilities, while also ensuring representation of both sexes. The amendment strongly urges City officers and agencies involved in appointments to consider and support female, minority, and disabled candidates. Additionally, it mandates the Commission on the Status of Women to conduct analyses every second and fourth year of each mayoral administration, tracking the diversity of appointments to these bodies based on voluntary disclosures of gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, and disability status.

  • Prop E - Requiring Board of Supervisors' Approval of Mayor's Appointments to the Public Utilities Commission and Creating Qualifications for Commission MembersPassed
    6/3/2008
    Yes: 51.79% No: 48.21%

    Mandates PUC appointment confirmation by BOS, establishes specific qualifications for four of five commission seats.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 71667
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano; Chris Daly; Bevan Dufty; Sean Elsbernd; Sophie Maxwell; Jake McGoldrick; Ross Mirkarimi; Aaron Peskin; Gerardo Sandoval
    • Noes: Michela Alioto-Pier; Carmen Chu
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City set qualifications for members of the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) and change the process for appointing members to the PUC by requiring a majority of the Board of Supervisors to approve the Mayor's appointments to the PUC?
    Summary

    Amends Section 4.112 of the City and County of San Francisco Charter to mandate that the Mayor's appointments to the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) must be confirmed by a majority vote of the Board of Supervisors, establish specific qualification requirements for four of the five PUC seats, and outline a transition plan for current members.

    Description

    Amends Section 4.112 of the City and County of San Francisco Charter to mandate that the Mayor's appointments to the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) must be confirmed by a majority vote of the Board of Supervisors. The amendment further establishes specific qualification requirements for four of the five PUC seats: Seat 1 for experience in environmental policy and justice, Seat 2 for ratepayer or consumer advocacy, Seat 3 for project finance, and Seat 4 for expertise in water systems, power systems, or public utility management, with Seat 5 designated as an at-large member. Additionally, it outlines a transition plan for current members, stipulating that new appointees will serve initial staggered terms (two years for Seats 2 and 4, and four years for Seats 1, 3, and 5) before all subsequent terms become four years.

February
  • Prop B - Creating a New Deferred Retirement Option Program for Members of the San Francisco Police DepartmentPassed
    2/5/2008
    Yes: 64.72% No: 35.28%

    Allow retirement-eligible police officers to work three additional years, accumulating regular benefits in tax deferred accounts.

    Origin: Signatures
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City allow certain retirement-eligible police officers to continue working for up to three additional years while accumulating their regular retirement benefits in tax deferred retirement accounts?

2007

November
  • Prop A - Transit Reform, Parking Regulation and Emissions ReductionPassed
    11/6/2007
    Yes: 55.66% No: 44.34%

    Enhances MTA autonomy, consolidates powers, establishes fund, mandates standards, reinforces Transit First policy.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 70731
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano; Chris Daly; Bevan Dufty; Sean Elsbernd; Sophie Maxwell; Ross Mirkarimi; Aaron Peskin
    • Noes: Michela Alioto-Pier; Ed Jew; Jake McGoldrick; Gerardo Sandoval
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the Municipal Transportation Agency be provided greater governing authority, and additional funding, and be required to develop a Climate Action Plan, and shall the City not increase the maximum number of parking spaces allowed for new private development projects unless approved by a super-majority of the Board?
    Summary

    Amends the San Francisco Charter to significantly enhance the Municipal Transportation Agency's (MTA) autonomy and authority over the city's transportation system, consolidating its powers, establishing a dedicated fund, mandating performance standards, reinforcing the "Transit First" policy, and modifying labor relations.

    Description

    Amends the San Francisco Charter to significantly enhance the Municipal Transportation Agency's (MTA) autonomy and authority over the city's transportation system, including the Municipal Railway and former Department of Parking and Traffic. This amendment consolidates MTA's powers regarding operations, personnel, and finances, establishes a dedicated Municipal Transportation Fund, and mandates the MTA to set and publicize measurable performance standards, implement a Climate Action Plan to reduce transportation-related greenhouse gas emissions, and reinforce the city's "Transit First" policy by prioritizing public transit, pedestrians, and bicycles. Furthermore, it modifies labor relations for "service-critical" employees to link compensation to performance and requires the Board of Supervisors to convert conflicting Traffic Code provisions into MTA Board rules.

  • Prop B - Limiting Hold-Over Service on Charter-Created Boards and CommissionsPassedNotable
    11/6/2007
    Yes: 71.16% No: 28.84%

    Establishes Charter Section 4.101.5 limiting hold-over service for City boards and commissions; tenure terminates 60 days post-expiration.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 70270
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Michela Alioto-Pier; Tom Ammiano; Chris Daly; Bevan Dufty; Sean Elsbernd; Sophie Maxwell; Jake McGoldrick; Ross Mirkarimi; Aaron Peskin; Gerardo Sandoval
    • Noes: Ed Jew
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall members of Charter-created boards and commissions be prohibited from serving as hold-overs for more than 60 days after their term expires?
    Summary

    Establishes Section 4.101.5 of the San Francisco Charter to limit hold-over service for most City boards and commissions, mandating that "Charter Commission" members' tenure terminates no later than 60 days after their term expires unless re-appointed, and requiring existing hold-over members to conclude service within 60 days of the amendment's effective date.

    Description

    Establishes Section 4.101.5 of the San Francisco Charter to limit hold-over service for members of most City boards and commissions. This amendment mandates that the tenure of a "Charter Commission" member (encompassing most appointive executive branch boards and commissions, with specific exclusions for citizen advisory committees and those under Articles V and XII) must terminate no later than 60 days after their term expires, unless they are re-appointed. Furthermore, any individual already serving as a hold-over member when this amendment becomes effective must conclude their service within 60 days of the amendment's effective date, unless otherwise provided in the Charter.

  • Prop C - Requiring Public Hearings on Proposed MeasuresPassedNotable
    11/6/2007
    Yes: 68.20% No: 31.80%

    Requires Mayor or Supervisors submit proposed initiatives to the Board for public hearing before ballot placement.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 70677
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Michela Alioto-Pier; Bevan Dufty; Sean Elsbernd; Ed Jew; Sophie Maxwell; Jake McGoldrick; Aaron Peskin
    • Noes: Tom Ammiano; Chris Daly; Ross Mirkarimi; Gerardo Sandoval
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the Mayor or four or more members of the Board of Supervisors who wish to place a measure on the ballot first be required to submit it to the Board of Supervisors for a public hearing?
    Summary

    Requires the Mayor or four or more members of the Board of Supervisors to submit any proposed initiative measure to the full Board of Supervisors for a public hearing at least 45 days prior to the Department of Elections' deadline for initiative submission, with a public hearing conducted by a Board committee at least 15 days before that deadline, and while failure to hold the hearing does not prevent the initiative from appearing on the ballot, the voter information pamphlet must disclose that the required public hearing did not take place, integrating the Mayor's power to submit initiatives with this new public hearing requirement.

    Description

    Requires the Mayor or four or more members of the Board of Supervisors to submit any proposed initiative measure to the full Board of Supervisors for a public hearing before it can be placed on the ballot. This submission must occur at least 45 days prior to the Department of Elections' deadline for initiative submission, with a public hearing conducted by a Board committee at least 15 days before that deadline. While failure to hold the hearing does not prevent the initiative from appearing on the ballot, the voter information pamphlet must disclose that the required public hearing did not take place. This amendment integrates the Mayor's power to submit initiatives with this new public hearing requirement.

  • Prop D - Renewing Library Preservation FundPassedNotable
    11/6/2007
    Yes: 74.47% No: 25.53%

    Establishes renewed Library Preservation Fund for 15 years, setting aside annual property tax for services, facilities, debt, and hours.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 70730
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Michela Alioto-Pier; Tom Ammiano; Bevan Dufty; Sean Elsbernd; Sophie Maxwell; Jake McGoldrick; Ross Mirkarimi; Aaron Peskin; Gerardo Sandoval
    • Noes: Chris Daly; Ed Jew
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the Library Preservation Fund be renewed and its purpose expanded so that the Fund can be used to repay debt issued by the City to construct and improve library facilities?
    Summary

    Establishes a renewed Library Preservation Fund for fifteen years, beginning fiscal year 2008-2009, by setting aside an annual amount from property tax levies, dedicated to providing library services, constructing, maintaining, and operating library facilities, supplementing existing General Fund appropriations, and authorizing debt issuance for library real property and equipment, while mandating baseline funding and minimum service hours, with a public input process for future modifications.

    Description

    Establishes a renewed Library Preservation Fund for fifteen years, beginning fiscal year 2008-2009, by setting aside an annual amount from property tax levies equivalent to two and one-half cents per one hundred dollars of assessed valuation. This fund, administered by the Library Department, is dedicated to providing library services, constructing, maintaining, and operating library facilities, and supplements existing General Fund appropriations. The amendment authorizes the issuance of debt for library real property and equipment, to be secured by and/or repaid from the Fund, and mandates that the City maintain a baseline level of funding for the Library Department, adjusted annually based on changes in discretionary revenues. Furthermore, it sets minimum system-wide and neighborhood branch service hours, requiring at least 1211 permanent service hours per week system-wide, and outlines a public input process for future modifications to these hours, while allowing for temporary reductions during facility closures for maintenance or emergencies.

  • Prop E - Requiring Mayor to Appear Monthly at a Board of Supervisors MeetingFailed
    11/6/2007
    Yes: 48.59% No: 51.41%

    Amends Charter by deleting significant mayoral powers, responsibilities, budget roles, veto power, and appointment functions.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 70726
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano; Chris Daly; Jake McGoldrick; Ross Mirkarimi; Aaron Peskin; Gerardo Sandoval
    • Noes: Michela Alioto-Pier; Bevan Dufty; Sean Elsbernd; Ed Jew; Sophie Maxwell
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the Mayor be required to appear in person at one regularly scheduled meeting of the Board of Supervisors each month to engage in formal policy discussions with members of the Board?
    Summary

    Amends the San Francisco City and County Charter by deleting significant mayoral powers and responsibilities, including those related to budget, veto power, emergency authority, and various appointment and administrative functions, while also removing the Board's authority to establish rules for mayoral appearances.

    Description

    Amends the San Francisco City and County Charter by deleting significant mayoral powers and responsibilities from Section 3.100, including the requirement for the Mayor to appear monthly before the Board of Supervisors for formal policy discussions, the Mayor's roles in budget introduction, supplemental appropriations, veto power, emergency authority, and various appointment and administrative functions, while also removing the Board's authority in Section 2.103 to establish rules for mayoral appearances.

  • Prop F - Authorizing the Board of Supervisors to Amend Contract for Retirement Benefits for Police Department Employees Who Were Airport Police OfficersPassed
    11/6/2007
    Yes: 51.60% No: 48.40%

    Authorizes asset transfer from PERS to SFERS for airport police; allows time worked to count toward police retirement benefits.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 70938
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Michela Alioto-Pier; Tom Ammiano; Bevan Dufty; Sean Elsbernd; Ed Jew; Sophie Maxwell; Jake McGoldrick; Ross Mirkarimi; Aaron Peskin; Gerardo Sandoval
    • Noes: Chris Daly
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the Board of Supervisors be granted the authority to amend the City's contract with the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) to allow police department employees who served as airport police officers before December 27, 1997 to end their participation in CalPERS and move their service credit to the San Francisco Employees' Retirement System?
    Summary

    Authorize the Board of Supervisors to amend the City Charter to allow the transfer of retirement assets and liabilities for certain airport police officers from PERS to SFERS, enabling their time as airport police to count towards police department retirement benefits under specific conditions and deadlines.

    Description

    Authorize the Board of Supervisors to amend the City Charter by modifying Sections A8.506-2 and A8.597-11(a) and adding Section A8.597-10(d) to enable the transfer of retirement assets and liabilities for certain airport police officers from the Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS) to the San Francisco Employees' Retirement System (SFERS). This amendment specifically allows time worked as an airport police officer to be included in the calculation of retirement benefits for police department employees, provided the member's accumulated assets and liabilities for that service are transferred to their SFERS account, they do not receive other PERS benefits for the same service, and they file a required waiver by February 1, 2008, with the provision not applying to those who separated, retired, or died before November 6, 2007.

2006

November
  • Prop B - Allowing Members of Boards and Commissions to Participate in Meetings by Teleconference due to Pregnancy and Related Conditions; Adoption of Parental Leave PoliciesPassed
    11/7/2006
    Yes: 72.22% No: 27.78%

    Mandates parental leave policies for city officials, authorizing remote meeting participation for pregnancy, childbirth, or childcare.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 60380
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Michela Alioto-Pier; Tom Ammiano; Chris Daly; Bevan Dufty; Sean Elsbernd; Fiona Ma; Sophie Maxwell; Jake McGoldrick; Ross Mirkarimi; Aaron Peskin; Gerardo Sandoval
    • Noes: None
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the Board of Supervisors adopt a parental leave policy that permits its members and members of all City boards and commissions to participate in meetings by teleconference when the member is not able to attend due to pregnancy, child birth or related condition?
    Summary

    Amends the San Francisco Charter to mandate parental leave policies for city officials and allow remote meeting participation for reasons related to pregnancy, childbirth, or childcare.

    Description

    Amends the San Francisco Charter to require the Board of Supervisors to adopt parental leave policies for its members and for members of other city boards and commissions, specifically authorizing remote participation in meetings via teleconferencing or other electronic means. This remote attendance is permitted when a member is physically unable to attend due to pregnancy, childbirth, or related conditions, as certified by a healthcare provider, or when absent to care for a child after birth, adoption, or foster care placement.

  • Prop C - Setting Salaries of Certain Local Elected OfficialsPassed
    11/7/2006
    Yes: 63.33% No: 36.67%

    Civil Service sets five-year salaries for officials based on Bay Area average with capped annual cost-of-living adjustments.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 60696
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Michela Alioto-Pier; Tom Ammiano; Chris Daly; Bevan Dufty; Fiona Ma; Sophie Maxwell; Jake McGoldrick; Ross Mirkarimi; Aaron Peskin; Gerardo Sandoval
    • Noes: Sean Elsbernd
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the Civil Service Commission set the salaries of the Mayor, City Attorney, District Attorney, Public Defender, Assessor-Recorder, Treasurer, and Sheriff based on the average salary paid to comparable officials in other Bay Area counties?
    Summary

    Establishes a new method for setting the salaries and benefits of San Francisco officials, where the Civil Service Commission determines a five-year base salary by averaging comparable county salaries, with annual cost-of-living adjustments capped at 5%, prohibiting salary reductions, and setting benefits not to exceed those of other miscellaneous officers.

    Description

    Establishes a new method for setting the salaries of the Mayor, City Attorney, District Attorney, Public Defender, Assessor-Recorder, Treasurer, and Sheriff in San Francisco. The Civil Service Commission will now determine a base five-year salary for these officials by conducting a survey of comparable offices in Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, San Mateo, and Santa Clara counties, averaging those salaries. This base salary will apply for a five-year period, with the initial period beginning July 1, 2007. For the subsequent four years within each five-year cycle, annual cost-of-living adjustments will be applied based on the Consumer Price Index, capped at a 5% increase. The amendment prohibits salary reductions through this process, maintaining existing salaries if the survey suggests a lower amount, unless cost-saving agreements are made with employee organizations. Additionally, the Commission will annually set benefits for these officials, ensuring they do not exceed those provided to other miscellaneous officers and employees.

June
  • Prop A - Additional Funding for Homicide Prevention ServicesFailed
    6/6/2006
    Yes: 49.24% No: 50.76%

    Implement Homicide Prevention Plan, Council, Survivors' Advocate/Fund, and $20 million annual Violence Prevention Fund until 2011.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 52009
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano; Chris Daly; Sophie Maxwell; Ross Mirkarimi; Aaron Peskin; Gerardo Sandoval
    • Noes: Michela Alioto-Pier; Bevan Dufty; Sean Elsbernd; Fiona Ma; Jake McGoldrick
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City allocate an additional $10 million primarily from the City's General Fund for each of the next three fiscal years for violence prevention and intervention services, establish a Homicide Prevention Planning Council to develop and annually revise a Homicide Prevention Plan and create a Survivors' Fund in the Office of the District Attorney?
    Summary

    Establishes San Francisco Charter Section 16.126 to implement a comprehensive Homicide Prevention Plan, creating a Homicide Prevention Planning Council to develop a plan by November 2006 with annual updates, mandating a Survivors' Advocate and Fund, and appropriating an additional $20 million annually for four fiscal years for a Violence Prevention Fund, all set to expire on June 30, 2011.

    Description

    Establishes San Francisco Charter Section 16.126 to implement a comprehensive Homicide Prevention Plan and create a Homicide Prevention Planning Council, which will develop a plan by November 2006, focusing on job creation, community response, and various support services, with annual updates through 2011. This amendment also mandates the creation of a Survivors' Advocate within the District Attorney's Office to assist homicide victims' survivors and establishes a Survivors' Fund to help cover related expenses like burial and counseling. Crucially, it appropriates an additional $20 million annually for four fiscal years (2007-2008 through 2010-2011) for a Violence Prevention Fund, dedicated to programs targeting high-risk populations with services such as job training, conflict resolution, and mental health support, while ensuring existing baseline funding for these efforts is not reduced. The entire section is set to expire on June 30, 2011.

2005

November
  • Prop C - Ethics Commission Budget and Outside CounselFailed
    11/8/2005
    Yes: 40.30% No: 59.70%

    Revise Ethics Commission funding, mandate baseline budget, authorize fees, permit outside counsel hiring for specific legal conflicts.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 50928
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Michela Alioto-Pier; Tom Ammiano; Chris Daly; Bevan Dufty; Fiona Ma; Sophie Maxwell; Jake McGoldrick; Ross Mirkarimi; Aaron Peskin; Gerardo Sandoval
    • Noes: Sean Elsbernd
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City create a new budget process for the Ethics Commission that alters the role of the Mayor, and authorize the Commission to hire outside consul under certain circumstances?
    Summary

    Amends the San Francisco Charter to revise the Ethics Commission's funding and legal counsel provisions by establishing a new budget process, mandating a minimum baseline budget, authorizing fees for ethics ordinances, and permitting the Commission to hire outside legal counsel in specific circumstances.

    Description

    Amends the San Francisco Charter to revise the Ethics Commission's funding and legal counsel provisions. The amendment establishes a new budget process requiring the Ethics Commission to annually submit an itemized budget to the Mayor by March 1, which the Mayor must include in the city's proposed budget without revision, though recommendations are allowed, and the Board of Supervisors retains final amendment and adoption authority, with the Mayor prohibited from reducing or rejecting Board-authorized expenditures. It mandates the Commission to first establish a "minimum baseline budget" based on a survey of comparable agencies, which subsequent annual budgets cannot fall below, and to update this baseline every three years, including a timeline for staffing adjustments. Additionally, the amendment authorizes the Ethics Commission to impose fees for administering and enforcing ethics-related ordinances, subject to a 30-day Board of Supervisors disapproval period. Finally, it permits the Ethics Commission to hire outside legal counsel by majority vote when the City Attorney or their staff is the subject of an Ethics Commission audit, fine, penalty, or complaint, specifying qualifications for such counsel (California State Bar member, preference for public law offices, or private attorneys with five years' relevant experience), all subject to conflict of interest rules and Commission funding.

  • Prop D - Appointment of Municipal Transportation Agency Board of DirectorsPassed
    11/8/2005
    Yes: 64.84% No: 35.16%

    Restructures Board appointments, divides nomination authority, expands qualifications, mandates rider status, establishes staggered terms, and limits terms.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 50818
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano; Chris Daly; Sophie Maxwell; Jake McGoldrick; Ross Mirkarimi; Aaron Peskin; Gerardo Sandoval
    • Noes: Michela Alioto-Pier; Bevan Dufty; Sean Elsbernd; Fiona Ma
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the President of the Board of Supervisors nominate three members and the Mayor nominate four members to the Municipal Transportation Agency Board of Directors, and shall the members be prevented from serving as "hold-overs"?
    Summary

    Restructures the appointment and governance of the Municipal Transportation Agency's Board of Directors by dividing nomination authority, expanding director qualifications, mandating regular Municipal Railway ridership, terminating existing board terms to establish new staggered terms with a three-term limit, and clarifying procedures for filling vacancies and removing members for cause.

    Description

    Restructures the appointment and governance of the Municipal Transportation Agency's seven-member Board of Directors by dividing nomination authority: the Mayor nominates four members, and the President of the Board of Supervisors nominates three, all subject to Board confirmation, with mayoral nominations deemed confirmed if the Board fails to act within 60 days. The amendment significantly expands director qualifications, requiring expertise in government, finance, labor relations, or public transportation, and mandates that a majority of directors, including specific nominees from both the Mayor and the Board President (one with a physical disability), must be regular Municipal Railway riders who continue to ride weekly, with all directors required to ride Muni at least once a week. It also terminates all existing board terms on April 30, 2006, establishing new staggered initial terms (two- and four-year) to ensure continuity, with all subsequent terms being four years, and imposes a three-term limit, while also clarifying procedures for filling vacancies and removing members for cause.

  • Prop E - Election Date of the Assessor-Recorder and Public DefenderPassed
    11/8/2005
    Yes: 70.16% No: 29.84%

    Shifts Public Defender and Assessor-Recorder election date from June primary to November general election, effective 2006.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 50356
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Michela Alioto-Pier; Tom Ammiano; Chris Daly; Bevan Dufty; Sean Elsbernd; Fiona Ma; Jake McGoldrick; Ross Mirkarimi; Aaron Peskin; Gerardo Sandoval
    • Noes: None
    • Other: Sophie Maxwell
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the election date of the Assessor-Recorder be moved from the Statewide Primary Election in June to the municipal election the following November?
    Summary

    Amends Section 13.101 of the San Francisco City and County Charter to change the election schedule for the Public Defender and Assessor-Recorder from the statewide primary election in June to the general municipal election in November, effective for elections held in 2006 and every fourth year thereafter.

    Description

    Amends Section 13.101 of the San Francisco City and County Charter to change the election schedule for the Public Defender and Assessor-Recorder. Previously, these officials were elected during the statewide primary election in June; the amendment shifts their election to the general municipal election in November, with this change becoming effective for elections held in 2006 and every fourth year thereafter.

2004

November
  • Prop C - Health Service SystemPassedNotable
    11/2/2004
    Yes: 56.33% No: 43.67%

    Amends Health Service System governance, transferring administration to Health Board, empowering oversight, and increasing member representation.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 40643
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano; Chris Daly; Bevan Dufty; Matt Gonzalez; Tony Hall; Fiona Ma; Gerardo Sandoval
    • Noes: Michela Alioto-Pier; Sophie Maxwell; Jake McGoldrick; Aaron Peskin
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the Health Service System be a separate City department, and shall the Health Service Board be authorized to appoint and remove the manager of the Health Service System?
    Summary

    Amends the San Francisco Charter to restructure the Health Service System by transferring administration from the Department of Human Resources to the Health Service Board, empowering it to manage health plans and rules, and revising its composition to increase member representation.

    Description

    Amends the San Francisco Charter to fundamentally restructure the governance of the Health Service System by transferring its administration from the Department of Human Resources directly to the Health Service Board. This amendment empowers the Health Service Board to appoint and oversee the Health Services Administrator, manage health plans, and establish system rules. Furthermore, it revises the Health Service Board's composition by replacing the City Attorney's seat with an additional elected member chosen from the System's active and retired participants, thereby increasing member representation on the Board.

  • Prop D - Changes to City CharterFailed
    11/2/2004
    Yes: 42.11% No: 57.89%

    Tolls Board deadlines, revises vote thresholds, limits holdovers, grants oversight, clarifies authority, removes legislative aide numbers.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 40981
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano; Chris Daly; Matt Gonzalez; Tony Hall; Sophie Maxwell; Jake McGoldrick; Aaron Peskin; Gerardo Sandoval
    • Noes: Michela Alioto-Pier; Bevan Dufty; Fiona Ma
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall Charter rules be changed concerning the deadlines and number of votes required for action by the Board of Supervisors, the number of aides per Board member, and the length of time the commissioners may serve after their term has expired?
    Summary

    Amends the San Francisco Charter to allow for the tolling of Board of Supervisors' deadlines, revise vote thresholds for Board actions, establish a 120-day limit for hold-over appointments, grant direct oversight to the Commission on Aging and Adult Services, clarify the Commission on the Environment's authority, and remove the specific number of legislative aides for Supervisors from the Charter.

    Description

    Amends the San Francisco Charter to implement several key changes: it allows for the tolling of Board of Supervisors' deadlines during recess periods, with specific exceptions for critical functions like budget and elections; it revises the vote threshold for Board actions when members are disqualified due to conflicts of interest, basing the required votes on the number of eligible members; it establishes a 120-day limit for hold-over appointments to city boards and commissions after a member's term expires; it grants the Commission on Aging and Adult Services direct oversight over the Department on Aging and Adult Services; it clarifies the Commission on the Environment's authority to review and recommend policies for environmental sustainability, including environmental justice, and to review City building and land use policies for environmental sustainability, while preserving the authority of other commissions; and it removes the specific number of legislative aides for Supervisors from the Charter, making it subject to budgetary discretion. Additionally, it updates relevant definitions to align with these new provisions.

  • Prop E - Police and Fire Survivor BenefitsPassed
    11/2/2004
    Yes: 66.01% No: 33.99%

    Pay police and fire survivor 100% retirement benefits if death occurs in the line of duty.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Alioto-Pier, Ammiano, Dufty, Gonzalez, Hall, Ma, McGoldrick, Peskin, Sandoval
    • Noes: Daly
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City pay the survivor of a police officer or firefighter who dies in the line of duty 100% of retirement benefits the officer or firefighter would have received?
  • Prop F - Noncitizen Voting in School Board ElectionsFailed
    11/2/2004
    Yes: 48.55% No: 51.45%

    Authorize San Francisco residents, parents, and caregivers to vote in School Board elections regardless of citizenship status.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 40645
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Michela Alioto-Pier; Tom Ammiano; Chris Daly; Bevan Dufty; Matt Gonzalez; Sophie Maxwell; Jake McGoldrick; Aaron Peskin; Gerardo Sandoval
    • Noes: Tony Hall; Fiona Ma
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    May San Francisco residents who are 18 or older vote in School Board elections, whether or not the resident is a United States citizen, if the resident is a parent, guardian or care-giver of a child in the School District?
    Summary

    Authorize San Francisco residents aged 18 or older with children in the San Francisco Unified School District to vote in School Board elections, regardless of citizenship, with this charter amendment set to expire on December 31, 2008, or after the second School Board election conducted under its provisions, unless extended by the Board of Supervisors.

    Description

    Authorize San Francisco residents aged 18 or older, who either have a child enrolled in the San Francisco Unified School District or serve as a legal guardian or caregiver for such a child, to vote in elections for the School Board of the San Francisco Unified School District, irrespective of their United States citizenship status. This charter amendment, adding Section 13.111, empowers the Board of Supervisors to adopt implementing ordinances after consulting with the Director of Elections. Notably, this section is set to expire on December 31, 2008, or after the second School Board election conducted under its provisions, whichever is later, unless the Board of Supervisors extends its effectiveness by ordinance prior to that date, and it does not affect the terms of incumbent School Board members.

  • Prop G - Health Plans for City ResidentsPassed
    11/2/2004
    Yes: 66.81% No: 33.19%

    Authorizes Health Service Board to offer resident health/dental benefits, independent of employee plans and Health Service System Fund.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 40642
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Michela Alioto-Pier; Tom Ammiano; Chris Daly; Bevan Dufty; Matt Gonzalez; Fiona Ma; Sophie Maxwell; Jake McGoldrick; Aaron Peskin; Gerardo Sandoval
    • Noes: Tony Hall
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City authorize the Health Service Board to establish health plans for City residents?
    Summary

    Authorizes the San Francisco Health Service Board to offer health and dental benefits to City and County residents under specific conditions, distinct from existing employee plans, without using the Health Service System Fund for these new benefits and with the City retaining discretion over details.

    Description

    Authorizes the San Francisco Health Service Board to offer health and dental benefits to City and County residents, distinct from existing plans for City employees and retirees. This new authority, outlined in amendments to Sections 12.200 and A8.421 of the Charter, requires a two-thirds vote by the Health Service Board and a three-fourths approval by the Board of Supervisors for any such plans to take effect. Crucially, residents enrolling in these plans will not become members of the Health Service System, and the Health Service System Fund is explicitly prohibited from being used to provide these resident benefits, with the City retaining sole discretion over plan details, eligibility, and cost allocation.

March
  • Prop A - Deferred Taxation PlanPassed
    3/2/2004
    Yes: 62.38% No: 37.62%

    Authorizes tax-deferred compensation plans for separating employees, administered by Retirement Board, with costs paid by participants.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 31547
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Chris Daly; Matt Gonzalez; Fiona Ma; Sophie Maxwell; Jake McGoldrick; Gavin Newsom; Aaron Peskin; Gerardo Sandoval
    • Noes: None
    • Absent: Bevan Dufty; Tony Hall
    • Other: Tom Ammiano
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall City employees who receive a cash payment for unused vacation time and sick leave be permitted to defer this payment and defer state and federal taxes on this payment?
    Summary

    Authorizes the Board of Supervisors to establish tax-deferred compensation plans for employees upon separation, administered by the Retirement Board in compliance with tax laws, with administrative costs borne by participants or third-party administrators.

    Description

    Authorizes the Board of Supervisors, by a three-fourths vote, to establish plans for the tax-deferred treatment of accumulated vacation, sick leave, or other compensation payable to City and County employees upon their separation from employment, ensuring consistency with federal and state requirements. These plans, which the City and County does not guarantee specific tax outcomes or financial gains for, will be administered by the Retirement Board, potentially with a third-party contractor, and must comply with tax laws without reducing existing Retirement System benefits. All reasonable administrative costs for these plans will be borne by the participants or the third-party administrator, not the City and County.

  • Prop B - Retirement Benefits for Public Defenders, District Attorneys, and InvestigatorsPassed
    3/2/2004
    Yes: 67.73% No: 32.27%

    Authorizes San Francisco to contract with PERS for prosecutors, public defenders, and investigators retirement, requiring cost-neutrality to the city.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 30857
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Chris Daly; Bevan Dufty; Matt Gonzalez; Fiona Ma; Sophie Maxwell; Jake McGoldrick; Gerardo Sandoval
    • Noes: Tony Hall; Aaron Peskin
    • Absent: Gavin Newsom
    • Other: Tom Ammiano
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    May the City contract with the California Public Employee Retirement System for retirement benefits for District Attorneys, Public Defenders and Public Defenders investigators if there is no change in cost to the City?
    Summary

    Authorizes the San Francisco Board of Supervisors to contract with the California Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS) for the enrollment of local prosecutors, public defenders, and public defender investigators as PERS members, effective January 1, 2002, requiring such contracts to be cost-neutral to the city.

    Description

    Authorizes the San Francisco Board of Supervisors to contract with the California Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS) to enroll local prosecutors, public defenders, and public defender investigators as PERS members, effective January 1, 2002, granting these individuals the right to participate in the city's health service system. This amendment defines eligible "local prosecutors" as specific legal staff in the District Attorney's Office (or related Child Support Services roles), "local public defenders" as legal staff in the Public Defender's Office, and "local public defender investigators" as investigators in the Public Defender's Office whose primary duties involve criminal case investigation. Crucially, any such contract must be cost-neutral to the city, allowing employee bargaining units to trade other benefits, including social security, to achieve this neutrality, with disputes over this provision exempt from certain charter dispute resolution procedures.

  • Prop C - Civilian Jobs in the Police DepartmentPassedNotable
    3/2/2004
    Yes: 61.85% No: 38.15%

    Authorizes Police Department to civilianize positions, reducing sworn officer minimums, ensuring no layoffs and maintaining community policing.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 31561
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano; Bevan Dufty; Matt Gonzalez; Tony Hall; Fiona Ma; Sophie Maxwell; Jake McGoldrick; Aaron Peskin; Gerardo Sandoval
    • Noes: Gavin Newsom
    • Other: Chris Daly
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City reduce the required number of uniformed Police officers if the City fills certain positions currently performed by uniformed officers with civilian staff?
    Summary

    Authorizes the San Francisco Police Department to civilianize positions and reduce sworn officer minimums, provided it doesn't impair police services, with conversions occurring as positions become vacant and annual reviews maximizing civilianization while maintaining or increasing community-focused sworn officers.

    Description

    Authorizes the San Francisco Police Department to civilianize certain positions by amending the city charter to allow for a reduction in the minimum sworn officer staffing level, currently 1,971, by the number of positions converted to civilian roles. This conversion process requires a joint study by the Controller and Chief of Police to identify suitable positions, ensuring no sworn officers are laid off for this purpose and that conversions only occur as positions become vacant. Crucially, any reduction in the sworn officer minimum is contingent upon a certification that it will not decrease the number of officers dedicated to neighborhood community policing, patrol, and investigations, nor substantially impair police services or emergency response capabilities, while also mandating annual reviews by the Police Commission to maximize civilianization and maintain or increase sworn officers in community-focused roles.

  • Prop D - Equal Treatment of Domestic PartnersPassed
    3/2/2004
    Yes: 65.07% No: 34.93%

    Empowers Supervisors to eliminate residency requirements, extend spousal rights, and mandate equal retirement benefits for domestic partners.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 31562
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Chris Daly; Bevan Dufty; Tony Hall; Fiona Ma; Sophie Maxwell; Jake McGoldrick; Gavin Newsom; Aaron Peskin; Gerardo Sandoval
    • Noes: None
    • Absent: Matt Gonzalez
    • Other: Tom Ammiano
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall domestic partners be allowed to register in the City, even if they live or work outside the City, and shall the City Employees' Retirement System treat domestic partners as spouses?
    Summary

    Amends the San Francisco Charter to empower the Board of Supervisors to modify or repeal the Domestic Partnership Ordinance, eliminating residency requirements and extending spousal rights, benefits, and responsibilities to domestic partners, while concurrently revising the Retirement System's Section A8.500-2 to mandate identical treatment of domestic partners and spouses for all retirement benefits to maintain the system's tax-qualified status.

    Description

    Amends the San Francisco Charter to empower the Board of Supervisors, by a three-fourths vote, to modify or repeal the Domestic Partnership Ordinance, specifically to eliminate residency requirements for establishing domestic partnerships, recognize partnerships formed in other jurisdictions akin to marriages, and extend to domestic partners the same rights, benefits, and responsibilities as spouses to the fullest legal extent. Concurrently, it revises the Retirement System's Section A8.500-2 to mandate that domestic partners be treated identically to spouses for all retirement benefits, including qualified survivor benefits, by clarifying eligibility, recognizing properly filed partnerships (including those from other jurisdictions), and outlining benefit payment conditions and limitations to maintain the system's tax-qualified status.

  • Prop E - Requests for City Records Containing Private InformationPassed
    3/2/2004
    Yes: 52.22% No: 47.78%

    Empowers Board of Supervisors to respond to legal orders for City records potentially violating individual constitutional rights.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 31574
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Chris Daly; Bevan Dufty; Matt Gonzalez; Sophie Maxwell; Jake McGoldrick; Gavin Newsom; Aaron Peskin; Gerardo Sandoval
    • Noes: Tony Hall; Fiona Ma
    • Other: Tom Ammiano
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the Board of Supervisors, rather than individual departments and officials, respond to requests made by the federal or state government for records that may contain private information about citizens?
    Summary

    Empowers the Board of Supervisors to respond to orders for City records and information under "watch laws" that could violate individual constitutional rights, by designating these laws, responding via ordinance, and establishing expedited procedures, including closed sessions.

    Description

    Empowers the Board of Supervisors to respond on behalf of the City and County of San Francisco to orders or requests for City records, information, or tangible things, specifically those made under state or federal "watch laws" that, if disclosed, could potentially violate individual constitutional rights. The Board gains the authority to designate these "watch laws" by resolution, provide for its direct response via ordinance, and establish procedures for expedited consideration, including the ability to meet in closed session when discussing information protected from public disclosure by federal or state law.

  • Prop F - Labor Negotiations with Deputy SheriffsPassed
    3/2/2004
    Yes: 63.16% No: 36.84%

    Reclassifies deputy sheriffs as safety employees, extending collective bargaining, strike prohibition, and binding arbitration for employment terms.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 31542
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Chris Daly; Bevan Dufty; Matt Gonzalez; Fiona Ma; Sophie Maxwell; Jake McGoldrick; Gavin Newsom; Aaron Peskin; Gerardo Sandoval
    • Noes: Tony Hall
    • Other: Tom Ammiano
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the rules that apply to labor negotiations with the uniformed members of the Police and Fire departments also apply to labor negotiations with the deputy sheriffs?
    Summary

    Reclassifies deputy sheriffs in San Francisco to "safety employees," extending to them collective bargaining, impasse resolution, strike prohibition, and binding arbitration for employment terms, aiming for peaceful dispute resolution.

    Description

    Reclassifies deputy sheriffs in San Francisco by amending Charter Sections A8.409 and A8.590-1 et seq., effectively moving them from the general "miscellaneous officers and employees" category to be covered as "safety employees" alongside firefighters, police officers, and airport police. This amendment extends to deputy sheriffs the same collective bargaining provisions and impasse resolution procedures, including a prohibition on strikes, an obligation for good faith negotiation, and mandatory binding arbitration for unresolved disputes concerning their wages, hours, benefits, and other employment terms, aiming to ensure peaceful and equitable resolution of such matters.

  • Prop G - Supplemental Pay for City Employees on Military DutyPassed
    3/2/2004
    Yes: 58.90% No: 41.10%

    Authorize City to retroactively provide supplemental military pay exceeding 180 days for called City employees.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Daly, Dufty, Gonzalez, Hall, Ma, Maxwell, McGoldrick, Newsom, Peskin, Sandoval
    • Noes: Ammiano
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    May the City provide supplemental pay for more than 180 days to City employees called for military service, and may the City provide this pay retroactively?
  • Prop H - Public Education FundPassed
    3/2/2004
    Yes: 70.77% No: 29.23%

    Establishes education fund, mandating city contributions to SFUSD and First Five Commission for programs and universal preschool access.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 31405
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano; Chris Daly; Bevan Dufty; Fiona Ma; Sophie Maxwell; Jake McGoldrick; Gavin Newsom; Gerardo Sandoval
    • Noes: Matt Gonzalez; Aaron Peskin
    • Absent: Tony Hall
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City create a fund to increase the City's spending for public education over the next eleven years?
    Summary

    Establishes the Public Education Enrichment Fund (PEEF) in San Francisco's Charter, mandating annual City contributions to the San Francisco Unified School District (SFUSD) and the First Five Commission, allocating funds for arts, music, sports, library, and universal preschool programs, while requiring expenditure plans, audits, and allowing for proportional reductions during budgetary shortfalls or new revenues.

    Description

    Establishes the Public Education Enrichment Fund (PEEF) in San Francisco's Charter, mandating annual City contributions to the San Francisco Unified School District (SFUSD) and the First Five Commission for eleven years, starting with specific annual increases and then adjusting based on General Fund revenues, while also requiring the City to maintain a baseline appropriation to SFUSD. Allocates one-third of PEEF funds to SFUSD for arts, music, sports, and library programs, one-third to the First Five Commission to achieve universal preschool access for four-year-olds by September 1, 2009, and the remaining one-third to SFUSD for general educational and support purposes, including potential in-kind services. Requires annual expenditure plans and audits, mandates the identification of City budget savings to offset PEEF contributions, and allows for proportional reductions in contributions during significant budgetary shortfalls or if new dedicated local/state revenues are secured, with a provision to transfer funds to the Children's Fund if the state attempts to supplant local contributions.

2003

November
  • Prop B - Retirement Benefits for Safety EmployeesPassed
    11/4/2003
    Yes: 66.83% No: 33.17%

    Modify retirement benefits for safety employees; add coroner investigators to PERS with cost-neutral financial stipulations.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 20938
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano; Chris Daly; Bevan Dufty; Matt Gonzalez; Tony Hall; Fiona Ma; Sophie Maxwell; Jake McGoldrick; Gavin Newsom; Aaron Peskin; Gerardo Sandoval
    • Noes: None
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City be authorized to amend its contract with the Public Employees Retirement System for retirement benefits for certain safety employees if the employees pay any increase in cost?
    Summary

    Amends Appendix A8.506-2 of the San Francisco Charter to modify retirement benefits for miscellaneous safety employees by expanding eligible personnel to include coroner medical examiner investigators for PERS, revising financial stipulations from "no net increase in cost" to "cost-neutral" with trade-offs, and preserving health service system participation for PERS members.

    Description

    Amends Appendix A8.506-2 of the San Francisco Charter to modify retirement benefits for miscellaneous safety employees, specifically expanding the list of eligible personnel to include coroner medical examiner investigators who can join the Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS). This amendment revises the financial stipulations by removing the prior requirement for contracts to have "no net increase in cost," replacing it with a mandate that contracts and amendments must be "cost-neutral," allowing employee bargaining units to trade salary or other employee-paid benefits to achieve this neutrality, with the Board of Supervisors or Community College District empowered to determine compliance, while preserving the right for these PERS members to participate in the health service system.

  • Prop C - City Services AuditorPassedNotable
    11/4/2003
    Yes: 70.57% No: 29.43%

    Amends Charter designating Controller as City Services Auditor, expanding oversight, auditing, mandating audit unit, whistleblower hotline, and Audit Fund.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 30812
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano; Bevan Dufty; Matt Gonzalez; Tony Hall; Fiona Ma; Sophie Maxwell; Jake McGoldrick; Gavin Newsom; Aaron Peskin; Gerardo Sandoval
    • Noes: Chris Daly
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the Controller be required to monitor City services, audit City programs, and investigate complaints, and shall the City set aside at least 0.2% of the annual budget to fund these activities?
    Summary

    Amends the City Charter to designate the Controller as the City Services Auditor, significantly expanding their responsibilities to include comprehensive oversight of city services and financial practices, establish a Services Audit Unit, mandate annual audits, create a whistleblower hotline, grant the Controller non-voting ex-officio membership on city boards, and establish a Citizens Audit Review Board and a dedicated Controller's Audit Fund from 0.2% of the City's annual budget.

    Description

    Amends the City Charter to designate the Controller as the City Services Auditor, significantly expanding their responsibilities to include comprehensive oversight of city services and financial practices. This new role mandates the establishment of a Services Audit Unit to monitor service levels, efficiency, and effectiveness across departments, set performance benchmarks, conduct regular financial and performance audits, and review management practices, including workers' compensation and overtime. The amendment also requires an annual audit of street and park maintenance, establishes a whistleblower hotline for citizens and employees, and grants the Controller non-voting ex-officio membership on the Board of Supervisors and all City commissions, enabling them to introduce legislation for service improvement. To ensure independent oversight, a Citizens Audit Review Board is created to advise the Controller and review audits, and a dedicated Controller's Audit Fund is established, allocating 0.2% of the City's annual budget for these expanded audit duties.

  • Prop D - Small Business CommissionPassed
    11/4/2003
    Yes: 55.92% No: 44.08%

    Creates Small Business Commission overseeing Office of Small Business, appointing seven members primarily from small businesses, authorizing executive director.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 30426
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano; Chris Daly; Bevan Dufty; Matt Gonzalez; Tony Hall; Fiona Ma; Sophie Maxwell; Gavin Newsom; Aaron Peskin; Gerardo Sandoval
    • Noes: None
    • Other: Jake McGoldrick
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City be required to have a Small Business Commission to set policies affecting small businesses, with four members appointed by the Mayor and three members appointed by the Board of Supervisors?
    Summary

    Creates a Small Business Commission to oversee the San Francisco Office of Small Business, with seven members appointed by the Mayor and Board of Supervisors for four-year terms, primarily from small businesses, and authorized to appoint an executive director.

    Description

    Creates a Small Business Commission to oversee the San Francisco Office of Small Business, consisting of seven members appointed by the Mayor (four) and the Board of Supervisors (three), who serve at the pleasure of their appointing authority. Initial appointments include some two-year terms, with all subsequent terms being four years. At least six commissioners must be owners, operators, or officers of San Francisco small businesses, and one may be a representative of a neighborhood-serving non-profit, with all selections aiming to reflect the diversity of neighborhood interests. The Commission is also authorized to appoint an executive director.

  • Prop E - Ethics ReformPassed
    11/4/2003
    Yes: 61.94% No: 38.06%

    Moves ethics rules to ordinances, establishes new procedures for removing officials, empowers Fire/Police Commissions, and defines misconduct.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 30681
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano; Chris Daly; Bevan Dufty; Matt Gonzalez; Tony Hall; Sophie Maxwell; Jake McGoldrick; Gavin Newsom; Aaron Peskin; Gerardo Sandoval
    • Noes: None
    • Absent: Fiona Ma
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City consolidate its government ethics law in one code, amend some of those ethics laws, and create new ethics laws?
    Summary

    Revises the City Charter's ethics provisions by moving detailed conflict of interest rules, dual office holding restrictions, and post-service employment bans for former Mayors/Supervisors and Ethics Commissioners into City ordinances for flexible statutory regulation, establishes new procedures for the suspension and removal of City officers and employees, including mandatory removal for crimes of moral turpitude and disqualification periods for official misconduct, while defining "official misconduct" and "discrimination," and empowers Fire and Police Commissions to set rules for their departments' civil service efficiency and clarifies the Civil Service Commission's rule-making authority for other City employees, with the entire ethics amendment's effectiveness contingent upon the adoption of related "Conflict of Interest Law Amendments" and outlining a process for their future modification.

    Description

    Revises the City Charter's ethics provisions by moving detailed conflict of interest rules, dual office holding restrictions, and post-service employment bans for former Mayors/Supervisors and Ethics Commissioners from the Charter into City ordinances, thereby allowing for more flexible statutory regulation. It establishes new, comprehensive procedures for the suspension and removal of City officers and employees, including mandatory removal for crimes of moral turpitude and new disqualification periods for those removed for official misconduct, while also providing a detailed definition for "official misconduct" and adding a definition for "discrimination." Furthermore, the amendment explicitly empowers the Fire and Police Commissions to set rules for their respective departments' civil service efficiency and clarifies the Civil Service Commission's rule-making authority for other City employees, with the entire ethics amendment's effectiveness contingent upon the adoption of related "Conflict of Interest Law Amendments" and outlining a process for their future modification.

  • Prop F - Targeted Early RetirementPassed
    11/4/2003
    Yes: 67.57% No: 32.43%

    Creates temporary early retirement for city employees, granting additional age and service to mitigate layoffs and save costs.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 30855
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano; Chris Daly; Bevan Dufty; Matt Gonzalez; Tony Hall; Fiona Ma; Sophie Maxwell; Jake McGoldrick; Gavin Newsom; Aaron Peskin; Gerardo Sandoval
    • Noes: None
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City allow some of its employees to retire early if they are in job classifications where individual positions are being eliminated because of the City's budget shortfall?
    Summary

    Establishes a temporary early retirement program for San Francisco City and County employees to mitigate layoffs during the fiscal crisis of 2003-2005, granting eligible employees additional age and service for retirement benefit calculations, overseen by city officials with City-borne costs, and forfeited if employees return to City service.

    Description

    Establishes a temporary early retirement program for San Francisco City and County employees to mitigate layoffs during the fiscal crisis of 2003-2005, with provisions for potential extensions. This amendment grants eligible employees, primarily those in classifications identified for layoffs, an additional three years of age and credited service for the purpose of calculating their retirement benefits. The program's implementation, including identifying eligible classifications and employees, is overseen by the Mayor, Controller, and Director of Human Resources, subject to Board of Supervisors' approval, with the City bearing all associated costs and ensuring compliance with federal tax laws; employees who return to City service after early retirement forfeit these added benefits.

  • Prop G - Rainy Day FundPassed
    11/4/2003
    Yes: 75.80% No: 24.20%

    Establishes a Rainy Day Reserve, mandating funding from revenue growth, capping the reserve, and allowing withdrawals during financial decline.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 30858
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano; Chris Daly; Bevan Dufty; Matt Gonzalez; Tony Hall; Fiona Ma; Sophie Maxwell; Jake McGoldrick; Aaron Peskin; Gerardo Sandoval
    • Noes: None
    • Other: Gavin Newsom
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City create a "rainy day" fund for money collected when there is an unusually large surplus, and for use in years when there is a revenue shortfall?
    Summary

    Establishes a new Rainy Day (Economic Stabilization) Reserve in the San Francisco Charter, mandating funding from General Fund revenue growth, capping the reserve at 10 percent of total General Fund revenues, and allowing withdrawals during projected revenue declines or to support the Unified School District under specific financial distress.

    Description

    Establishes a new Rainy Day (Economic Stabilization) Reserve within the San Francisco Charter, outlining specific rules for its funding and use. This amendment mandates that 50 percent of General Fund revenue growth exceeding five percent annually be allocated to the Reserve, which is capped at 10 percent of total General Fund revenues, with any excess directed to capital or one-time expenditures. Funds may be withdrawn from the Reserve, up to 50 percent of its balance but not exceeding the projected revenue shortfall, when General Fund revenues are anticipated to decline, with special provisions allowing withdrawals to support the Unified School District under specific financial distress. The amendment also transitions existing City Cash Reserve funds into this new Rainy Day Reserve and clarifies general fiscal provisions to align with this new economic stabilization mechanism.

  • Prop H - Police Commission/Office of Citizen ComplaintsPassedNotable
    11/4/2003
    Yes: 51.93% No: 48.07%

    Amends Charter, altering Police Commission structure, enhancing OCC authority to file charges, restricting Chief's suspension power.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 30859
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano; Chris Daly; Matt Gonzalez; Sophie Maxwell; Jake McGoldrick; Aaron Peskin; Gerardo Sandoval
    • Noes: Bevan Dufty; Tony Hall; Fiona Ma; Gavin Newsom
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City increase the size of the Police Commission and change how its members are appointed, and shall the Office of Citizen Complaints be authorized to file charges against police officers with the Police Commission?
    Summary

    Amends the San Francisco Charter to significantly alter the Police Commission's structure and powers, and enhance the Office of Citizen Complaints' (OCC) authority, by increasing the Commission to seven members with a split appointment process, modifying removal procedures, empowering the OCC director to file charges directly with the Police Commission, and restricting the Chief of Police's ability to unilaterally suspend officers for more than ten days in cases where the OCC has sustained a complaint.

    Description

    Amends the San Francisco Charter to significantly alter the Police Commission's structure and powers, and enhance the Office of Citizen Complaints' (OCC) authority. The amendment increases the Police Commission from five to seven members, establishing a split appointment process where the Mayor nominates four (subject to Board of Supervisors confirmation) and the Board appoints three, while also modifying removal procedures to require Board approval for Mayor-nominated members and prohibiting holdover terms. Furthermore, it empowers the OCC director to verify and file charges directly with the Police Commission for sustained citizen complaints against police members, after conferring with the Chief of Police, and mandates prompt production of records to the OCC by city departments. It also restricts the Chief of Police's ability to unilaterally suspend officers for more than ten days in cases where the OCC has sustained a complaint, requiring prior consultation with the OCC director and allowing the OCC to file charges, which then shifts the suspension authority to the Police Commission, though temporary suspensions in exigent circumstances are still permitted pending an administrative hearing.

2002

November
  • Prop D - EnergyFailed
    11/5/2002
    Yes: 46.28% No: 53.72%

    Change Public Utilities Commission authority/duties to become primary electricity provider for San Francisco residents and businesses.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano, Chris Daly, Matt Gonzalez, Mark Leno, Sophie Maxwell, Jake McGoldrick, Aaron Peskin, Gerardo Sandoval
    • Noes: Tony Hall, Gavin Newsom, Leland Yee
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City change the authority and duties of the Public Utilities Commission to make it the primary provider of electricity to San Francisco residents and businesses?
  • Prop E - Water and Sewer RatesPassed
    11/5/2002
    Yes: 55.27% No: 44.73%

    Restructuring PUC, granting exclusive control over utilities, enhancing rate authority, enabling revenue bonds, managing personnel.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 20887
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano, Chris Daly, Matt Gonzalez, Mark Leno, Sophie Maxwell, Jake McGoldrick, Aaron Peskin, Gerardo Sandoval
    • Noes: Tony Hall, Gavin Newsom, Leland Yee
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City end the water and sewer rate freeze, and use surplus funds from its utilities to operate and maintain the utilities before transferring any surplus to the General Fund?
    Summary

    Amends the San Francisco Charter to significantly restructure the Public Utilities Commission (PUC), granting it exclusive control over the City's water, clean water, and power assets, establishing it as an independent revenue department with enhanced authority over rates and contracts, and empowering it to issue revenue bonds and manage personnel, while also deleting Section 9.111-1 regarding Environment Protection Loans.

    Description

    Amends the San Francisco Charter to significantly restructure the Public Utilities Commission (PUC), granting it exclusive control over the City's water, clean water, and power assets, including their management, construction, and financial resources. The amendment establishes the PUC as an independent revenue department with enhanced authority to set utility rates, fees, and charges based on cost-of-service and financial health, subject to Board of Supervisors rejection, and mandates the creation of a Rate Fairness Board. It permits the PUC to transfer surplus funds between its own utility systems before any transfer to the City's General Fund, and authorizes the PUC to independently enter into various contracts, including water purchase/sale agreements and project labor agreements for capital improvements. Furthermore, the amendment empowers the PUC to issue revenue bonds for capital projects with Board of Supervisors approval, requires the development of comprehensive long-term capital, financial, and strategic plans, and provides greater discretion over personnel matters, including the hiring and compensation of top-level managers. This charter amendment also deletes the existing Section 9.111-1 regarding Environment Protection Loans.

  • Prop F - Entertainment Commission AppointmentsPassed
    11/5/2002
    Yes: 56.71% No: 43.29%

    Establishes Entertainment Commission; Mayor nominates four members, Supervisors appoint three; details terms and removal processes.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 20805
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano, Chris Daly, Matt Gonzalez, Mark Leno, Jake McGoldrick, Gavin Newsom, Aaron Peskin, Gerardo Sandoval
    • Noes: Tony Hall, Sophie Maxwell, Leland Yee
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the Mayor appoint four members of the new Entertainment Commission, subject to approval by the Board of Supervisors, and shall the Board of Supervisors appoint the other three members?
    Summary

    Establishes the San Francisco Entertainment Commission with seven members (four nominated by the Mayor, three by the Board of Supervisors), detailing their appointment, varying initial terms, subsequent four-year terms, and distinct removal processes.

    Description

    Establishes the San Francisco Entertainment Commission with seven members, where the Mayor nominates four and the Board of Supervisors appoints the remaining three. The Mayor's nominees, subject to Board approval within 60 days (otherwise deemed approved), must represent neighborhood associations, entertainment groups, urban planning, and law enforcement. The Board's appointees must represent neighborhood associations, entertainment groups, and the public health community. Initial terms for commissioners vary from two to four years, with all subsequent appointments serving four-year terms. The amendment also details distinct removal processes for Mayor-nominated and Board-appointed members, referencing Section 15.105.

  • Prop G - Elections AssistancePassed
    11/5/2002
    Yes: 72.89% No: 27.11%

    Clarify and modify roles of City employees, Sheriff in elections, restricting Elections and Ethics Commission staff, City Attorney.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 11315
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano, Chris Daly, Matt Gonzalez, Tony Hall, Mark Leno, Sophie Maxwell, Jake McGoldrick, Gavin Newsom, Aaron Peskin, Gerardo Sandoval, Leland Yee
    • Noes: None
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City clarify and modify the role of City employees and the Sheriff in elections, and the restrictions on Elections and Ethics Commission members, their staffs and the City Attorney?
  • Prop H - Police and Firefighters Retirement BenefitsPassed
    11/5/2002
    Yes: 64.26% No: 35.74%

    Enacts new retirement plans for police/firefighters, detailing service/incapacity retirement, death allowances, contributions, and funding.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 20803
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano; Chris Daly; Matt Gonzalez; Tony Hall; Mark Leno; Sophie Maxwell; Jake McGoldrick; Gavin Newsom; Aaron Peskin; Gerardo Sandoval; Leland Yee
    • Noes: None
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City increase retirement benefits for police and firefighters?
    Summary

    Enacts new, comprehensive retirement plans for San Francisco police officers and firefighters, effective January 1, 2003, with provisions for service and incapacity retirement, death allowances, member contributions, city funding, and benefit adjustments, while ensuring vesting rights and forfeiture for moral turpitude.

    Description

    Enacts new, comprehensive retirement plans for San Francisco police officers and firefighters by adding Sections A8.595 through A8.598-15 to the City Charter and modifying Sections A8.500-1 and A8.500-2. Effective January 1, 2003, these plans allow existing members to opt-in and automatically enroll new hires, establishing detailed provisions for service retirement (requiring 25 years of service and age 50 for electing members, or 5 years and age 50 for new members, with benefits based on age and service, capped at 90% of final compensation), incapacity retirement (for duty-related and non-duty-related disabilities), and death allowances for surviving dependents, including domestic partners. The amendment also outlines member contributions (7% of compensation), city funding, annual allowance adjustments linked to compensation rates, benefit offsets for other compensation, service credit rules, and limitations on post-retirement employment, while ensuring vesting rights after five years of service and forfeiture of benefits for duty-related moral turpitude convictions.

  • Prop I - Paid Parental LeavePassed
    11/5/2002
    Yes: 53.75% No: 46.25%

    Provides City employees supplemental parental leave pay, ensuring base wage up to 16 weeks, requiring repayment if leaving early.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 20885
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano; Chris Daly; Matt Gonzalez; Mark Leno; Sophie Maxwell; Jake McGoldrick; Gavin Newsom; Aaron Peskin; Gerardo Sandoval; Leland Yee
    • Noes: Tony Hall
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City provide up to 12 or 16 weeks of paid leave for City employees who take time off after the birth, adoption or foster care placement of a child?
    Summary

    Establishes Charter Section A8.365 to provide supplemental parental leave compensation for City and County of San Francisco employees, ensuring they receive their regular base wage for up to 12 or 16 weeks, contingent on exhausting accrued paid leave and subject to repayment if separating within six months of returning to work.

    Description

    Establishes Charter Section A8.365 to provide supplemental compensation for City and County of San Francisco employees during approved parental leave, aiming to ensure they receive the equivalent of their regular base wage. This compensation, available for up to 12 weeks for Family Medical Leave or up to 16 weeks for Temporary Pregnancy Disability Leave (with a 16-week total cap), requires employees to first exhaust all accrued paid leave and is reduced by other government payments, ensuring total compensation does not exceed the regular base wage. Eligible employees generally include those working at least 20 hours weekly for six months or 1040 hours in the prior year, and the City will continue retirement and health benefit contributions during the leave. If an employee voluntarily separates from City service within six months of returning to work, the supplemental compensation is treated as a repayable loan, and the benefit itself is explicitly non-vested, allowing future alteration or repeal by voters.

  • Prop J - Supervisors SalariesPassedNotable
    11/5/2002
    Yes: 55.55% No: 44.45%

    Amends Charter establishing full-time Supervisors; mandates Civil Service Commission sets salaries every five years based on surveys.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 20884
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Ammiano; Daly; Gonzalez; Hall; Leno; Maxwell; McGoldrick; Peskin; Sandoval
    • Noes: Newsom; Yee
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall members of the Board of Supervisors serve full-time and shall the Civil Service Commission set the salaries for Supervisors?
    Summary

    Amends Section 2.100 of the City and County of San Francisco Charter to establish the Board of Supervisors member as a full-time role, mandating the Civil Service Commission to determine salaries every five years based on surveys of other California City Councils and County Boards of Supervisors, potentially considering the Consumer Price Index, and adjusting salaries for comparable cost savings if other employee compensation is reduced.

    Description

    Amends Section 2.100 of the City and County of San Francisco Charter to establish the position of Board of Supervisors member as a full-time role. This amendment further mandates that the Civil Service Commission (CSC) shall determine the Supervisors' salary once every five years, replacing a previously fixed salary. In setting these salaries, the CSC is required to conduct a survey of other full-time California City Councils and County Boards of Supervisors, and may also consider the Consumer Price Index (CPI). Additionally, the CSC must review and adjust Supervisors' salaries to achieve comparable cost savings if the City and employee organizations agree to reduce other employee compensation.

March
  • Prop A - Instant Runoff VotingPassedNotable
    3/5/2002
    Yes: 55.48% No: 44.52%

    Establishes instant runoff voting system for electing city officers, eliminating separate runoff elections, requiring voter ranking and education.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 10856
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano; Chris Daly; Matt Gonzalez; Tony Hall; Mark Leno; Sophie Maxwell; Jake McGoldrick; Gavin Newsom; Aaron Peskin; Gerardo Sandoval
    • Noes: Leland Yee
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City use instant run-off voting to elect City officers with a majority of votes without separate run-off elections?
    Summary

    Establishes an instant runoff voting system for electing multiple city officials by requiring voters to rank candidates, thereby eliminating separate runoff elections, and mandates voter education and compatible voting equipment for implementation in November 2002 or 2003.

    Description

    Establishes an instant runoff voting system for electing the Mayor, Sheriff, District Attorney, City Attorney, Treasurer, Assessor-Recorder, Public Defender, and members of the Board of Supervisors, thereby eliminating separate runoff elections. This new method requires voters to rank candidates by preference; if no candidate receives over 50% of first-choice votes, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated, and their votes are transferred to the voter's next-ranked choice until one candidate achieves a majority. The amendment mandates voter education on this ranked-choice method and requires future voting equipment to be compatible, with implementation set for the November 2002 general municipal election, or November 2003 if the Department of Elections certifies it is not ready.

  • Prop B - Cost of Living BenefitsPassed
    3/5/2002
    Yes: 63.38% No: 36.62%

    City changes method for paying cost of living increases to retired employees, adjusting benefits delivery.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano, Chris Daly, Matt Gonzalez, Tony Hall, Mark Leno, Sophie Maxwell, Jake McGoldrick, Gavin Newsom, Aaron Peskin, Gerardo Sandoval, Leland Yee
    • Noes: None
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City change the way it pays cost of living increases to retired employees?
  • Prop C - Non-U.S. Citizen Commission ParticipationFailed
    3/5/2002
    Yes: 31.76% No: 68.24%

    Allow non-U.S. citizens to serve on San Francisco boards, commissions, and advisory bodies.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano, Chris Daly, Matt Gonzalez, Tony Hall, Mark Leno, Sophie Maxwell, Jake McGoldrick, Gavin Newsom, Aaron Peskin, Leland Yee
    • Noes: None
    • Absent: Gerardo Sandoval
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City permit individuals who are not U. S. citizens to serve on San Francisco boards, commissions and advisory bodies?
  • Prop D - Appointment of Planning Commission & Board of AppealsPassedNotable
    3/5/2002
    Yes: 57.15% No: 42.85%

    Amends Charter, altering Planning Commission and Board of Appeals appointments, limiting mayoral removal power to misconduct.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 10964
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano; Chris Daly; Matt Gonzalez; Tony Hall; Mark Leno; Sophie Maxwell; Jake McGoldrick; Aaron Peskin; Gerardo Sandoval
    • Noes: Gavin Newsom; Leland Yee
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City change the way members of the Planning Commission and Board of Appeals are appointed and removed?
    Summary

    Amends the City Charter to significantly alter the appointment and removal processes for the Planning Commission and Board of Appeals, requiring Board of Supervisors approval for nominations and limiting removal to official misconduct, replacing the Mayor's at-will power.

    Description

    Amends the City Charter to significantly alter the appointment and removal processes for the Planning Commission and Board of Appeals. For the seven-member Planning Commission, the Mayor would nominate four members and the President of the Board of Supervisors would nominate three. For the five-member Board of Appeals, the Mayor would nominate three and the President of the Board of Supervisors would nominate two. All nominations would require approval by the Board of Supervisors following a public hearing within 60 days; if the Board fails to act within that timeframe, the nominee would be deemed rejected, and the Board could reject an appointment by a majority vote, a reduction from the previous two-thirds requirement. Crucially, members of both bodies, once appointed, could only be removed for official misconduct, replacing the Mayor's previous at-will removal power.

  • Prop E - Domestic Partner BenefitsPassed
    3/5/2002
    Yes: 65.71% No: 34.29%

    Permit pre-1995 retired employees to make domestic partners eligible for survivor benefits, expanding existing benefits.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano, Chris Daly, Matt Gonzalez, Tony Hall, Mark Leno, Sophie Maxwell, Jake McGoldrick, Gavin Newsom, Aaron Peskin, Gerardo Sandoval, Leland Yee
    • Noes: None
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City permit employees who retired before 1995 to make their domestic partners eligible to receive survivor benefits?

2001

November
  • Prop C - Elective Office VacanciesPassed
    11/6/2001
    Yes: 75.10% No: 24.90%

    Shortens interim appointment period for elective office vacancies until successor is elected at next regular election.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 10540
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano; Chris Daly; Matt Gonzalez; Tony Hall; Mark Leno; Sophie Maxwell; Jake McGoldrick; Gavin Newsom; Aaron Peskin; Gerardo Sandoval; Leland Yee
    • Noes: None
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the rules for filling vacancies in elective offices be changed to shorten the time that a person appointed to fill a vacant office would serve before there is an election for that office?
    Summary

    Amends the City Charter to shorten interim appointment periods for vacancies in elective offices, including those vacated due to recall, requiring an appointee to serve until a successor is elected at the next regularly scheduled election within 12 months.

    Description

    Amends the City Charter to shorten the interim appointment period for vacancies in elective offices, including Assessor-Recorder, City Attorney, District Attorney, Public Defender, Sheriff, Treasurer, Board of Supervisors, Board of Education, and Community College District. Under the revised rules, an appointee will serve until a successor is elected at the next regularly scheduled election, which must occur at least 120 days after the vacancy arises but no more than 12 months after the office becomes vacant, with no special election called. The amendment also explicitly applies these new vacancy-filling rules to offices vacated due to a recall.

  • Prop D - Land Fill in San Francisco BayPassed
    11/6/2001
    Yes: 74.46% No: 25.54%

    Require voter approval for City projects placing 100 acres or more of land fill in San Francisco Bay.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano, Chris Daly, Matt Gonzalez, Tony Hall, Mark Leno, Sophie Maxwell, Jake McGoldrick, Gavin Newsom, Aaron Peskin, Gerardo Sandoval, Leland Yee
    • Noes: None
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall voter approval be required for any City project that would place 100 acres or more of fill in San Francisco Bay?
  • Prop E - Election, Ethics, Outside CounselPassed
    11/6/2001
    Yes: 62.70% No: 37.30%

    Establishes new Elections Commission, revises ethics/election rules, broadens investigative authority, creates outside counsel process, mandates ballot counts.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 11315
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano; Chris Daly; Matt Gonzalez; Tony Hall; Mark Leno; Sophie Maxwell; Jake McGoldrick; Gavin Newsom; Aaron Peskin; Gerardo Sandoval
    • Noes: Leland Yee
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall there be 1. a new Elections Commission to oversee the Department of Elections 2. a rule prohibiting City employees outside the Department of Elections from helping with elections without Board of Supervisors approval 3. new conflict-of-interest rules for the Elections Department, Elections Commission, Ethics Commission and City Attorney 4. a reorganization of the Ethics Commission; and 5. new procedures for City agencies to retain outside legal counsel when the City Attorney has a conflict of interest?
    Summary

    Establishes a new Elections Commission with expanded powers, revises conflict-of-interest rules for election and ethics officials, broadens the Ethics Commission's investigative authority, creates a process for city agencies to retain outside legal counsel, prohibits the City Attorney from participating in most campaigns, and mandates detailed ballot counts at polling places.

    Description

    Establishes a new Elections Commission to oversee the Department of Elections, comprising seven members appointed by various city officials for five-year terms, with powers to appoint and remove the Director of Elections and set election policies. The amendment prohibits most city employees from assisting with elections, except on Election Day with Board of Supervisors approval, and assigns election security and ballot transportation to the Sheriff's Department. It expands conflict-of-interest rules for members and employees of both the new Elections Commission and the Ethics Commission, including post-service restrictions on political activity. The Ethics Commission's term length is extended to six years, and its investigative authority is broadened to allow independent investigations without prior District Attorney or City Attorney decline. Furthermore, the amendment creates a process for city agencies to retain outside legal counsel when the City Attorney has a conflict of interest, and explicitly prohibits the City Attorney from participating in campaigns for candidates or measures on the city ballot, except for their own candidacy. Finally, it mandates the posting of detailed ballot counts at polling places after polls close.

  • Prop F - Municipal Water and Power AgencyFailed
    11/6/2001
    Yes: 49.80% No: 50.20%

    Replace Public Utilities Commission with new elected Municipal Water and Power Agency focused on electricity, renewable energy, and conservation.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano, Mark Leno, Sophie Maxwell, Jake McGoldrick, Aaron Peskin, Gerardo Sandoval
    • Noes: Chris Daly, Matt Gonzalez, Tony Hall, Gavin Newsom, Leland Yee
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission be replaced with a new Municipal Water and Power Agency, governed by an elected board, whose goals would be to provide electricity to San Francisco and to develop renewable energy and conservation projects?
  • Prop G - RedistrictingPassed
    11/6/2001
    Yes: 55.96% No: 44.04%

    Mandating adjusted census data for district lines, setting Task Force appointment deadlines, and revising appointing authority.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 11316
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano; Chris Daly; Matt Gonzalez; Tony Hall; Mark Leno; Sophie Maxwell; Jake McGoldrick; Gavin Newsom; Aaron Peskin; Gerardo Sandoval
    • Noes: Leland Yee
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the rules for redrawing Board of Supervisors district lines be changed to require the use of adjusted census data and to establish deadlines for the beginning and completing redistricting?
    Summary

    Revises San Francisco's redistricting process for Board of Supervisors districts by mandating the use of statistically adjusted federal census data, setting deadlines for the Elections Task Force's appointment and district line redrawing, and stipulating that an Elections Commission would appoint three Task Force members if established.

    Description

    Revises San Francisco's redistricting process for Board of Supervisors districts by mandating the use of statistically adjusted federal census data, or state-adjusted data if federal is unavailable, to correct for population undercounts or overcounts, with a provision for re-redrawing if adjusted data becomes available later and shows significant variance. The amendment establishes specific deadlines for the appointment of the nine-member Elections Task Force—by January 8, 2002, for the 2000 census, and within 60 days of a non-compliance report for subsequent censuses—and requires the completion of district line redrawing by April 15th preceding the next supervisorial election. Furthermore, it stipulates that if an Elections Commission is established, it will appoint three members to the Task Force, replacing the Director of Elections' appointments.

  • Prop H - Revenue Bonds, Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation ProjectsPassed
    11/6/2001
    Yes: 53.90% No: 46.10%

    Allow supervisors to issue revenue bonds for renewable energy and conservation facilities without voter approval.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano, Chris Daly, Matt Gonzalez, Mark Leno, Sophie Maxwell, Jake McGoldrick, Gavin Newsom, Aaron Peskin, Gerardo Sandoval
    • Noes: Tony Hall, Leland Yee
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the Board of Supervisors be allowed to issue revenue bonds to pay for renewable energy facilities or energy conservation facilities without voter approval?

2000

November
  • Prop B - District AideFailed
    11/7/2000
    Yes: 37.49% No: 62.51%

    Allow Board of Supervisors members to hire a third aide for increased legislative support capacity.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano, Alicia Becerril, Sue Bierman, Amos C. Brown, Leslie R. Katz, Mark Leno, Mabel Teng, Michael Yaki
    • Noes: Barbara Kaufman, Gavin Newsom, Leland Yee
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City allow each member of the Board of Supervisors to hire a third aide?
  • Prop C - City Worker RetirementPassed
    11/7/2000
    Yes: 60.15% No: 39.85%

    Increasing retirement benefits for miscellaneous City employees hired after 1976 by passing the ballot measure.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano, Alicia Becerril, Sue Bierman, Amos C. Brown, Leslie R. Katz, Barbara Kaufman, Mark Leno, Gavin Newsom, Mabel Teng, Michael Yaki, Leland Yee
    • Noes: None
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City increase retirement benefits for miscellaneous employees hired after 1976?
  • Prop D - Children's FundPassed
    11/7/2000
    Yes: 73.13% No: 26.87%

    Extend Children's Fund until 2016, increase tax revenue set-aside, create advisory committee, and add planning requirements.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano, Alicia Becerril, Sue Bierman, Amos C. Brown, Leslie R. Katz, Barbara Kaufman, Mark Leno, Gavin Newsom, Mabel Teng, Michael Yaki, Leland Yee
    • Noes: None
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City extend the Children's Fund until 2016, increase the annual set-aside of property tax revenues for the Fund, create a citizen advisory committee, and add new planning requirements?
  • Prop E - City Retiree Health BenefitsPassed
    11/7/2000
    Yes: 56.78% No: 43.22%

    Increase retired employee health benefits: cap premiums, pay half dependent's coverage cost.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano, Alicia Becerril, Sue Bierman, Amos C. Brown, Leslie R. Katz, Barbara Kaufman, Mark Leno, Gavin Newsom, Mabel Teng, Michael Yaki, Leland Yee
    • Noes: None
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City increase health benefits for retired City employees by placing a cap on monthly health care premium costs, and paying one-half the cost of health coverage for the retiree's primary dependent?
March
  • Prop C - Open Space FundPassed
    3/7/2000
    Yes: 73.70% No: 26.30%

    Extend Open Space Fund 30 years, adding planning and budgeting requirements, authorizing Board Supervisors issue Fund-secured revenue bonds.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano, Alicia Becerril, Sue Bierman, Amos C. Brown, Leslie R. Katz, Barbara Kaufman, Mark Leno, Gavin Newsom, Mabel Teng, Michael Yaki, Leland Yee
    • Noes: None
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City extend the Open Space Fund for 30 years, add new planning and budgeting requirements, and authorize the Board of Supervisors to issue revenue bonds secured by the Fund?
  • Prop D - Board of Supervisors BenefitsPassed
    3/7/2000
    Yes: 50.50% No: 49.40%

    Add Board of Supervisors members to the Employee Retirement System; authorize City to pay full health benefits cost.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano, Alicia Becerril, Sue Bierman, Amos C. Brown, Leslie R. Katz, Barbara Kaufman, Mark Leno, Gavin Newsom, Mabel Teng, Michael Yaki, Leland Yee
    • Noes: None
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the members of the Board of Supervisors be added to the City's Employee Retirement System and shall the City be authorized to pay the full cost of health benefits for Board members?

1999

November
  • Prop B - Firefighter and Police Retirement BenefitsPassed
    11/2/1999
    Yes: 71.40% No: 28.50%

    Allow 1981 Tier 2 firefighters and police officers to receive improved retirement benefits contingent upon certain repayment conditions.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano, Alicia Becerril, Sue Bierman, Amos C. Brown, Leslie R. Katz, Barbara Kaufman, Mark Leno, Gavin Newsom, Mabel Teng, Michael Yaki, Leland Yee
    • Noes: None
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall firefighters and police officers who transferred to the Tier 2 retirement plan in 1981 receive improved retirement benefits given other Tier 2 members since then if they meet certain repayment conditions?
  • Prop C - Supervisorial District BoundariesPassed
    11/2/1999
    Yes: 71.80% No: 28.10%

    Redefine supervisorial districts for electing Board of Supervisors members, changing how the City elects its representatives.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano, Alicia Becerril, Sue Bierman, Amos C. Brown, Leslie R. Katz, Barbara Kaufman, Mark Leno, Gavin Newsom, Mabel Teng, Michael Yaki, Leland Yee
    • Noes: None
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City make changes in how it defines the districts that will be used to elect members of the Board of Supervisors?
  • Prop D - Sick Leave and Vacation Credit TransfersPassed
    11/2/1999
    Yes: 75.80% No: 24.10%

    Allowing City employees to donate sick leave/vacation for catastrophically ill colleagues, spouses, partners, or dependents.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano, Alicia Becerril, Sue Bierman, Amos C. Brown, Leslie R. Katz, Barbara Kaufman, Mark Leno, Gavin Newsom, Mabel Teng, Michael Yaki, Leland Yee
    • Noes: None
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall City employees be allowed to donate unused sick leave or vacation credits to a pool for City employees who are catastrophically ill, and to donate vacation credits to be used by City employees to care for catastrophically ill spouses, domestic partners, and dependents?
  • Prop E - Municipal Transportation AgencyPassedNotable
    11/2/1999
    Yes: 61.00% No: 38.90%

    Establishes a Municipal Transportation Agency, consolidating transit/parking operations under a board; creates fund, sets Muni performance standards.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Legistar #: 990600
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano, Alicia Becerril, Amos C. Brown, Leslie R. Katz, Barbara Kaufman, Mark Leno, Gavin Newsom, Mabel Teng, Michael Yaki, Leland Yee
    • Noes: Sue Bierman
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City create a Municipal Transportation Agency with expanded powers and duties to run the Municipal Railway and the Department of Parking and Traffic?
    Summary

    Establishes a Municipal Transportation Agency (MTA) to replace the Public Transportation Commission, consolidating transit, parking, and potentially taxi operations under a seven-member board, creating a dedicated fund with annual contributions and performance standards for Muni, and integrating a detailed Transit-First Policy into the City's General Plan.

    Description

    Establishes a Municipal Transportation Agency (MTA) to replace the Public Transportation Commission, consolidating the operation of the Municipal Railway (Muni) and, by 2002, the Department of Parking and Traffic, with the option for the Board of Supervisors to add the Taxi Commission. Governed by a seven-member board of directors appointed by the Mayor and confirmed by the Board of Supervisors, requiring specific qualifications and allowing removal only for cause, the MTA gains exclusive control over its operations, including purchasing, contracting, and personnel matters for "service-critical" employees, with performance-based incentives. The amendment creates a dedicated Municipal Transportation Fund with a minimum annual contribution from the General Fund, subject to Board of Supervisors rejection by a two-thirds vote, but not modification, and sets specific performance standards for Muni (e.g., 98.5% scheduled service, 85% on-time). It also outlines rules for Muni fare and route changes, with fare and route changes subject to Board of Supervisors rejection by a two-thirds vote, and replaces the existing Transit-First Policy with a more detailed version integrated into the City's General Plan, while also establishing a Citizens' Advisory Council.

1998

November
  • Prop A - Police Retirement BenefitsPassed
    11/3/1998
    Yes: 57.40% No: 42.50%

    Increase pension benefits for San Francisco police officers who were hired on or after the year 1976.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano, Sue Bierman, Amos C. Brown, Leslie R. Katz, Barbara Kaufman, Mark Leno, Juanita Owens Medina, Gavin Newsom, Mabel Teng, Leland Yee
    • Noes: None
    • Absent: Michael Yaki
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City increase pension benefits for police officers hired after 1976?
  • Prop B - Customer Service PlanPassed
    11/3/1998
    Yes: 56.20% No: 43.70%

    Requiring City departments to annually prepare a Customer Service Plan to meet public service goals.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano, Sue Bierman, Amos C. Brown, Leslie R. Katz, Barbara Kaufman, Mark Leno, Mabel Teng, Michael Yaki, Leland Yee
    • Noes: None
    • Absent: Juanita Owens Medina, Gavin Newsom
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall City departments be required to prepare an annual Customer Service Plan?
  • Prop C - Paramedic Retirement BenefitsPassed
    11/3/1998
    Yes: 62.10% No: 37.80%

    Allowing the City to count paramedics' Public Health Department time toward their Fire Department pensions.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano, Sue Bierman, Amos C. Brown, Leslie R. Katz, Barbara Kaufman, Mark Leno, Juanita Owens Medina, Gavin Newsom, Mabel Teng, Leland Yee
    • Noes: None
    • Absent: Michael Yaki
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City count the time that paramedics worked for the Department of Public Health towards their Fire Department pensions?
  • Prop D - Taxi CommissionPassed
    11/3/1998
    Yes: 67.10% No: 32.80%

    City creates a Taxi Commission to regulate taxicabs, improving oversight and policy within the transportation sector.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano, Sue Bierman, Amos C. Brown, Leslie R. Katz, Barbara Kaufman, Mark Leno, Juanita Owens Medina, Gavin Newsom, Mabel Teng, Leland Yee
    • Noes: None
    • Absent: Michael Yaki
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City create a Taxi Commission to regulate taxicabs?
June
  • Prop B - Supervisors' SalaryPassed
    6/2/1998
    Yes: 58.20% No: 41.70%

    Increase Board of Supervisors members' salary from $23,924 to $37,585 via a ballot question.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano, Sue Bierman, Amos C. Brown, Leslie R. Katz, Barbara Kaufman, Juanita Owens Medina, Michael Yaki, Leland Yee
    • Noes: None
    • Absent: Gavin Newsom, Mabel Teng
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the salary of members of the Board of Supervisors be increased from $23,924 to $37,585?
  • Prop C - Utility Revenue UseFailed
    6/2/1998
    Yes: 41.70% No: 58.20%

    Change water utility spending priorities, move other income priorities, and create separate water utility fund.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano, Sue Bierman, Amos C. Brown, Leslie R. Katz, Barbara Kaufman, Juanita Owens Medina, Michael Yaki, Leland Yee
    • Noes: None
    • Absent: Gavin Newsom, Mabel Teng
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City change the priorities for spending water utility income, move the priorities for spending other income from the Charter to the Administrative Code, and create a separate fund for water utility income?
  • Prop D - Environmental Protection LoansPassed
    6/2/1998
    Yes: 64.00% No: 35.90%

    Authorize City to borrow Federal and State money for environmental improvement projects, subject to approval from the voters.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano, Sue Bierman, Amos C. Brown, Leslie R. Katz, Barbara Kaufman, Juanita Owens Medina, Michael Yaki, Leland Yee
    • Noes: None
    • Absent: Gavin Newsom, Mabel Teng
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City be authorized to borrow money from the Federal and State governments to pay certain environmental improvement projects?

1997

November
  • Prop C - Police and Firefighter Retirement BenefitsFailed
    11/4/1997
    Yes: 49.00% No: 50.90%

    Allow City employees to return Tier 2 transfer cash for retirement benefit increases.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano, Sue Bierman, Leslie R. Katz, Barbara Kaufman, Susan Leal, Juanita Owens Medina, Mabel Teng, Michael Yaki, Leland Yee
    • Noes: None
    • Absent: Amos C. Brown, Gavin Newsom
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall City employees who transferred from the Tier 1 to Tier 2 retirement plan be permitted to return the cash payment received for the transfer in exchange for certain benefit increases?
  • Prop D - Lease ApprovalsPassed
    11/4/1997
    Yes: 67.80% No: 32.10%

    Combine lease approval sections and mandate BOS approval for leases earning $1 million or more in revenue.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano, Sue Bierman, Leslie R. Katz, Barbara Kaufman, Susan Leal, Juanita Owens Medina, Mabel Teng, Michael Yaki, Leland Yee
    • Noes: None
    • Absent: Amos C. Brown, Gavin Newsom
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the Charter be amended to combine two sections governing approval of leases, and specify that the Board of Supervisors must approve leases that earn $1 million or more in revenue?
  • Prop E - Youth CommissionFailed
    11/4/1997
    Yes: 47.00% No: 52.90%

    Increase powers and change rules governing the City's Youth Commission.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano, Sue Bierman, Amos C. Brown, Leslie R. Katz, Barbara Kaufman, Susan Leal, Juanita Owens Medina, Gavin Newsom, Mabel Teng, Michael Yaki, Leland Yee
    • Noes: None
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the Charter be amended to increase the powers of and change the rules governing the City's Youth Commission?
June
  • Prop E - Public Utilities Commission Revenue UsesFailed
    6/3/1997
    Yes: 37.00% No: 62.90%

    Remove utility income spending priorities from the City's governing rules.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano, Sue Bierman, Amos C. Brown, Leslie R. Katz, Barbara Kaufman, Susan Leal, Gavin Newsom, Michael Yaki, Leland Yee
    • Noes: None
    • Absent: Juanita Owens Medina, Mabel Teng
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the Charter be amended to remove the priorities for the use of utility income?

1996

November
  • Prop C - Retired Employee BenefitsPassed
    11/5/1996
    Yes: 50.60% No: 49.30%

    Increase the cost of living adjustments paid to most San Francisco city retirees.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Angela Alioto, Tom Ammiano, Sue Bierman, Amos C. Brown, Tom Hsieh, Leslie R. Katz, Barbara Kaufman, Kevin Shelley, Mabel Teng, Michael Yaki
    • Noes: None
    • Absent: Susan Leal
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City increase the cost of living adjustments paid to most city retirees?
  • Prop D - Firefighter Retirement BenefitsPassed
    11/5/1996
    Yes: 57.60% No: 42.30%

    Increase City pension benefits for firefighters hired after 1976, subject to voter approval.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Angela Alioto, Tom Ammiano, Sue Bierman, Amos C. Brown, Tom Hsieh, Leslie R. Katz, Barbara Kaufman, Kevin Shelley, Mabel Teng, Michael Yaki
    • Noes: None
    • Absent: Susan Leal
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the City increase pension benefits for firefighters hired after 1976?
  • Prop E - Employment Benefits and PracticesFailed
    11/5/1996
    Yes: 27.30% No: 72.60%

    Allow Supervisors, not voters, to approve changes in City employee retirement, health benefits, and employment rules.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Tom Ammiano, Sue Bierman, Amos C. Brown, Leslie R. Katz, Barbara Kaufman, Kevin Shelley, Mabel Teng, Michael Yaki
    • Noes: Susan Leal
    • Absent: Angela Alioto, Tom Hsieh
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the Board of Supervisors, rather than the voters, approve changes in City employee retirement and health benefits and other Charter rules governing City employment?
  • Prop F - Board of Supervisors SalariesFailed
    11/5/1996
    Yes: 36.60% No: 63.30%

    Increase Board of Supervisors salary from $23,924 to $50,000, allowing City Retirement benefits for members.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Angela Alioto, Tom Ammiano, Sue Bierman, Amos C. Brown, Tom Hsieh, Leslie R. Katz, Barbara Kaufman, Kevin Shelley, Mabel Teng, Michael Yaki
    • Noes: None
    • Absent: Susan Leal
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the salary paid to members of the Board of Supervisors be increased from $23,924 to $50,000, and shall Board members be permitted to receive City Retirement benefits?
  • Prop G - Election of Supervisors, District ElectionsPassedNotable
    11/5/1996
    Yes: 56.70% No: 43.20%

    Elect Supervisors by district; implement district run-off elections if no candidate receives majority vote.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Angela Alioto, Tom Ammiano, Sue Bierman, Tom Hsieh, Leslie R. Katz, Kevin Shelley, Michael Yaki
    • Noes: Amos C. Brown, Barbara Kaufman, Susan Leal, Mabel Teng
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the Board of Supervisors be elected by district, and shall there be district run-off elections if no candidate receives a majority of the votes cast in a district?
  • Prop H - Election of Supervisors, Preference VotingFailedNotable
    11/5/1996
    Yes: 43.50% No: 56.40%

    Elect Board of Supervisors members using preference voting method.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Angela Alioto, Tom Ammiano, Amos C. Brown, Tom Hsieh, Leslie R. Katz, Barbara Kaufman, Susan Leal, Kevin Shelley, Mabel Teng, Michael Yaki
    • Noes: Sue Bierman
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the Board of Supervisors be elected using preference voting?
  • Prop I - Police and Firefighter Personnel PoliciesFailed
    11/5/1996
    Yes: 45.70% No: 54.20%

    Police and Fire Commissions establish recruitment, hiring, promotion rules, and conduct civil service tests for employees.

    Origin: Board of Supervisors
    Board of Supervisors Vote
    • Ayes: Angela Alioto, Tom Ammiano, Sue Bierman, Amos C. Brown, Tom Hsieh, Leslie R. Katz, Barbara Kaufman, Kevin Shelley, Mabel Teng, Michael Yaki
    • Noes: None
    • Absent: Susan Leal
    Show more information
    Ballot title
    Shall the Police Commission and Fire Commission establish the rules and procedures for recruiting, hiring, and promoting police officers and firefighters, and conduct civil service tests for these employees?
Data source: Internal CSV (Chronicle list, enriched). Percentages reflect official results where available. This is an experimental view.