Jen Nossokoff
- Office: Board of Supervisors, District 1
- Election Date: November 5, 2024
- Candidate: Jen Nossokoff
- Due Date: June 28, 2024
- Printable Version
Thank you for seeking GrowSF's endorsement for the November 5, 2024 election! GrowSF believes in a growing, beautiful, vibrant, healthy, safe, and prosperous city via common sense solutions and effective government. Our work includes running public opinion polls to understand what voters want, advocating for those changes, and ensuring that the SF government represents the people.
The GrowSF endorsement committee will review all completed questionnaires and seek consensus on which candidates best align with our vision for San Francisco.
Please complete this questionnaire by June 28, 2024 so we have enough time to adequately review and discuss your answers.
Your Goals
We'd like to get some details about your high-level goals and how you intend to use your elected office to achieve them.
Why are you running for Board of Supervisors, District 1?
I am running for the Board of Supervisors, District 1, because I believe passionately in the power of community and the urgent need for visionary leadership in our district. Living and raising my family in San Francisco's Upper West Side, I have witnessed both the challenges and opportunities of urban living. I am committed to making our streets safer, reducing car dependency, enhancing public transportation, and ensuring the community's voice is heard and respected. My unique perspective as a healthcare professional and public school parent positions me well to tackle the pressing issues facing our district.
What is your #1 policy goal?
My #1 policy goal is to improve community safety through strategic enforcement, cleaner streets, and optimized transportation. I will implement targeted traffic enforcement to deter dangerous driving behaviors, streamline street designs to reduce congestion and improve flow, and expand efficient public and multi-modal transit options. By prioritizing these initiatives, we will create a safer, more accessible environment for all residents, enhancing the quality of life in our community.
How will you build the coalition and political capital to enact your #1 goal?
Fortunately, safer streets are a common thread across the San Francisco political spectrum and an area where we can unite. I will leverage this shared priority to build a broad coalition of support, engaging with government agencies, community-based organizations, local businesses, and residents. Through open communication and collaboration, we can create a unified vision for safer streets. I will also use data-driven approaches to advocate for evidence-based policies and work closely with public safety officials and transportation experts to ensure effective implementation. This inclusive and collaborative approach will help build the political capital needed to achieve our goal of safer, more accessible streets for all.
Will the power of the office of Board of Supervisors, District 1 be enough to achieve this goal?
The power of the office can significantly influence transportation policies and initiatives. However, achieving this goal will also require collaboration with city and state transportation agencies, securing funding, and community support.
What are your #2 and #3 policy goals?
My #2 policy goal is to promote health equity. This involves addressing the social determinants of health by ensuring access to quality healthcare, affordable housing, and healthy food options. It also includes supporting mental health services and programs that target underserved communities.
My #3 policy goal is to enhance community safety by reducing property crime through data-driven strategic policing and robust public works and beautification projects. Implementing community policing strategies, increasing street lighting, and using technology and data analytics to prevent crime are essential steps. Additionally, supporting local businesses in safety initiatives and maintaining clean streets through beautification projects will build a sense of pride and ownership within the community, contributing to a safer and more activated environment.
Will the power of the office of Board of Supervisors, District 1 be enough to achieve these goals?
The office has the power to influence policies and allocate resources to promote health equity and reduce property crime. Collaboration with other government entities, community organizations, and local businesses will also be essential to achieving these goals effectively.
What is an existing policy you would like to reform?
I would like to reform the city's transit policy to improve efficiency and accessibility. The current transit system needs optimization to better serve the community's needs. This includes increasing the frequency and reliability of public transportation, expanding protected bike lanes, and ensuring that all neighborhoods have access to safe and convenient transit options. By enhancing the infrastructure and coordination of various transit modes, we can reduce car dependency, lower emissions, and create a more sustainable and equitable transportation system for all residents.
What is an "out there" change that you would make to state/local government policy, if you could? (For example: adding at-large supervisors, changing how elections work, creating a Bay Area regional government, etc.)
Tell us one thing you think needs to change in SF that the average voter wouldn't know about.
San Francisco needs to streamline the permitting process for small businesses. The current process is overly complex and time-consuming, which discourages new businesses from opening and hinders economic growth.
The Issues
Next, we will cover the issues that voters tell us they care about. We hope to gain a better understanding of your policy positions, and we hope that you use this opportunity to communicate with voters.
Public Safety
What is the #1 public safety issue today?
The #1 public safety issue in District 1 today is traffic violence. Increasing pedestrian and cyclist safety through better infrastructure and enforcement is crucial.
San Francisco currently has about 1,500 sworn police officers. Some have argued that the City should try to match the per-capita staffing levels that other large cities have. If we matched cities like New York or Paris, we would need to have about 3,400 sworn officers. What do you think of this idea? If you support it, how would the City fund recruitment at SFPD to achieve this staffing level? If you don't support it, what would you propose to do instead?
While increasing the number of officers could improve response times, it is also critical that we explore alternative solutions like community policing, investing in mental health services, and using technology for crime prevention.
What solutions might exist to improve public safety that don't involve expanding the size of SFPD?
Improving public safety can be achieved through better street lighting, expanding community policing, investing in mental health and addiction services, and utilizing technology like surveillance cameras and data analytics.
What three things would you change about how SFPD operates?
-
Implement comprehensive de-escalation training.
-
Increase transparency and accountability through body cameras and public reporting.
-
Enhance community engagement and collaboration to build trust and improve crime prevention.
Do you support policies commonly referred to as "defund the police"? Why or why not?
I support examining police budgets across the country and allocating city funding in a way that does not over-inflate police departments. It's important to clarify that "Defund the Police" means different things to different people. We must balance law enforcement with adequate social services to address systemic issues.
Please explain why you did or did not support the recall of DA Chesa Boudin. If you were ineligible to vote in that election, please explain how you would have voted.
I did not take a position on the recall at the time. While his mission of supporting and rehabilitating minor offenders is admirable, the execution of this vision didn't align with the general safety and needs of the city at large.
| Should San Francisco… | Yes | No |
|---|---|---|
| Try to achieve "full staffing" for SFPD? (Defined as about 2,100 officers, according to the City) Adequate staffing is crucial for effective policing, but it should be balanced with investments in community services. | X | |
| Change the cite-and-release policy so officers can arrest suspects of misdemeanors like shoplifting and car break-ins? Arrests for repeat offenders and organized theft can deter crime, but it should be coupled with restorative justice programs. | X | |
| Arrest and prosecute street-level fentanyl dealers? To address the drug crisis, enforcement against dealers is necessary alongside support for addiction treatment. | X | |
| Prioritize diversion instead of incarceration for street-level fentanyl dealers? Diversion programs can reduce recidivism and support rehabilitation efforts. | X | |
| Investigate, arrest, and prosecute fentanyl distribution ringleaders (like organized crime and cartel members)? Targeting the sources of distribution is essential for disrupting drug trafficking networks. | X | |
| Arrest and prosecute street-level vendors of suspected stolen goods? Reducing the market for stolen goods can deter theft. | X | |
| Investigate, arrest, and prosecute the leaders of theft rings and fencing operations? Addressing organized crime requires targeting the leaders of theft operations. | X | |
| Arrest and prosecute street food vendors operating without a permit? Instead, we should streamline the permitting process to support legitimate street vending. | X | |
| Fine street food vendors operating without a permit? Fines can encourage compliance with health and safety standards. | X |
If you want to explain any positions above, please feel free:
Comments added in-line.
Drugs
In general, how should the City handle people who are abusing drugs on City sidewalks?
The City should offer immediate support through outreach teams that provide access to treatment and services while maintaining public order.
Do you support the creation of safe consumption sites in San Francisco? If so, please detail how they should be run. If not, please explain a viable alternative.
Yes, safe consumption sites can reduce overdose deaths and connect individuals with treatment services. They should be run by trained healthcare professionals and include pathways to recovery programs.
Some have argued that safe consumption sites (or sobering centers) are only viable if they are paired with implementing zero-tolerance for public consumption of illegal drugs like fentanyl and heroin. Do you agree or disagree with this view?
I partially agree with this view. While safe consumption sites (SCSs) can significantly reduce the harms associated with drug use, improve public health, and enhance community safety, their effectiveness can be enhanced by implementing complementary policies. A zero-tolerance approach to public consumption of illegal drugs can help maintain public order and encourage individuals to use designated safe consumption sites where they can access medical supervision and support services.
Safe consumption sites independently have proven benefits in reducing overdose deaths, preventing the spread of infectious diseases, and connecting users to treatment services. Studies have shown that SCSs reduce public drug use, lower the incidence of drug-related crime, and improve overall community safety without increasing local crime rates.
Should fentanyl dealing be penalized differently from dealing other drugs?
Yes, given the high lethality and widespread impact of fentanyl, harsher penalties can act as a deterrent.
Mental Health
Should San Francisco amend our current laws around mental health crisis intervention to better help people suffering on the streets? If yes, why and how? If not, why not?
Yes, we need laws that allow for more proactive intervention, providing care and treatment for individuals unable to care for themselves due to severe mental health issues.
What is the role of the government in providing care for those who cannot care for themselves?
The government has a responsibility to ensure the well-being of all citizens, including providing mental health services and support for those who cannot care for themselves.
Some have argued that San Francisco should place people who are experiencing mental health crises on the streets into involuntary mental health holds at psychiatric facilities. Do you agree or disagree with this view? Please explain why or why not.
I agree, but with stringent oversight and safeguards to protect individual rights and prevent abuse. The goal should be to provide necessary care while respecting human dignity.
If you agree with this view, please outline some guardrails and oversight the City must provide to prevent abuse.
The City must establish clear criteria for involuntary holds, ensure regular review by independent bodies, provide legal representation for those held, and guarantee humane treatment and access to comprehensive care.
If you disagree with this view, please outline your preferred alternative solution as well as any drawbacks it might have and oversight it might need.
Education
Should the Board of Education be reformed to bring more accountability and better performance to the Board, and boost public school performance? If so, how; if not, why not?
Yes, the Board of Education should be reformed to enhance accountability and performance. Improving communication, focusing on student outcomes, and increasing community engagement are key. Regular updates on decisions, setting clear student achievement goals, and involving parents, teachers, and students in decision-making can drive better results. Implementing accountability measures like performance reviews and transparent reporting can ensure effective oversight. Providing ongoing professional development for board members will also help them make informed, data-driven decisions to improve educational outcomes.
Some parents prefer their children attend religious schools, others prefer magnet schools for specific skills (like the Ruth Asawa School for the Arts or Lowell), and others prefer charter schools with nontraditional curricula. Do you think all of these educational options should be available to students in San Francisco?
Yes, all these educational options should be available, but with specific considerations. Magnet schools should be fully supported as they offer specialized programs that cater to students' diverse talents and interests. Charter schools can provide innovative educational approaches, but they need strict oversight to ensure accountability and equitable access. However, I do not believe the city should fund religious education, as public funds should support secular institutions that serve all students regardless of their background. Ensuring a variety of high-quality educational options is essential for meeting the diverse needs of San Francisco's students.
Did you support the recall of Board of Education members Collins, López, and Moliga? Please explain why you did or did not support the recall of each member.
Yes, I support the recall due to their failure to prioritize reopening schools during the pandemic and focusing on non-essential issues over students' educational needs.
| Should San Francisco… | Yes | No |
|---|---|---|
| Offer Algebra in 8th grade to students who want it? Providing advanced coursework opportunities supports academic growth and readiness. | X | |
| Offer Algebra in 7th grade to students who want it? Early access to advanced courses can benefit students prepared for them. | X | |
| Offer AP courses to high school students who want them? AP courses prepare students for college and offer opportunities for academic challenge. High school students should also have access to take advanced courses at local colleges and universities for free if the courses are not offered at their school. This ensures all students have the opportunity to pursue higher-level learning and prepare for their future academic and career endeavors. | X | |
| Require schools to improve student performance, and fire teachers who consistently underperform? Accountability is essential, but support and professional development should be provided to help teachers succeed. | X |
If you want to explain any positions above, please feel free:
Comments added in-line.
Small Business
What would you change about the process of new retail business formation in San Francisco?
I would streamline the permitting process, reduce fees, and offer more support for new businesses to encourage entrepreneurship and economic growth. Simplifying the process will help reduce barriers to entry, making it easier for small businesses to thrive.
Should all businesses be permitted by-right? If not, which business categories do you think should require special government approval?
Not all businesses should be permitted by-right. High-impact businesses such as those involving hazardous materials, adult entertainment, or establishments that significantly affect local traffic and noise levels should require special government approval to ensure community safety and compatibility with neighborhood character.
Some in the Small Business community have argued that San Francisco should increase the number of available ABC permits (also known as a liquor license) to lower the cost of running a business and increase customer revenues from alcohol sales. Others have argued against increasing the number of permits because they don't want more competition, or have already paid a lot of money for their liquor license. What do you think the City should do?
Given these considerations, the decision to increase the number of ABC permits should be carefully evaluated, balancing the potential economic benefits with the interests of existing businesses and community concerns. Public consultation and a thorough impact assessment would be essential steps in making an informed decision.
Similarly, some in the legal cannabis retailer community have lobbied to reduce the number of available permits. Economists have argued that this reduces competition, raises prices for consumers, and raises profits for retailers. What do you think the City should do?
The City should focus on ensuring that all cannabis retailers adhere to stringent regulations to maintain public safety and quality standards rather than reducing the number of permits.
| Should San Francisco… | Yes | No |
|---|---|---|
| Reduce the time to obtain all permits to open a new business to no more than 3 months Streamlining the permitting process will encourage entrepreneurship and reduce barriers to entry for new businesses. | X | |
| Reduce the cost of obtaining permits to open a new business Lowering permit costs will make it easier for small businesses to start and grow. | X | |
| Reduce the number of activities which must obtain permits, and expand the number of by-right activities Simplifying regulations can boost economic growth and make it easier for businesses to operate. | X | |
| Try to attract businesses of all sizes to the City? A diverse business environment strengthens the local economy and creates job opportunities. | X |
If you want to explain any positions above, please feel free:
Comments added in-line.
Housing
Do you believe that San Francisco has a shortage of homes? Why or why not?
Yes, San Francisco has a significant shortage of homes. The high demand for housing coupled with limited supply has led to skyrocketing housing prices and a lack of affordable options for many residents.
Do you believe that housing prices are set by supply and demand constraints? Why or why not?
Yes, housing prices are largely set by supply and demand constraints. The limited supply of housing in San Francisco, coupled with high demand, has driven up prices, making it difficult for many people to afford housing.
San Francisco will almost certainly fail its Housing Element certification, which will cause the State to take over local land use regulation. What should we do now?
San Francisco should proactively address the issues leading to the failure of its Housing Element certification by:
-
Increasing Housing Supply: Expedite the approval process for new housing developments.
-
Zoning Reforms: Implement zoning reforms to allow for higher density and mixed-use developments.
-
Public-Private Partnerships: Encourage partnerships between the city and private developers to create more affordable housing options.
Should homeless shelters be exempt from CEQA, Discretionary Review, and Conditional Use permits?
To expedite the construction and availability of homeless shelters, they should be exempt from these processes, which can significantly delay development.
Should subsidized Affordable housing be exempt from CEQA, Discretionary Review, and Conditional Use permits?
Exempting subsidized affordable housing from these permits will help address the housing crisis more efficiently by reducing delays and costs associated with development.
Should market rate housing be exempt from CEQA, Discretionary Review, and Conditional Use permits?
While streamlining the process is important, market rate housing should still undergo some level of review to ensure that developments align with community needs and standards.
Should San Francisco retain, loosen, or even abolish the existing limits on height, density, and bulk for residential buildings? (ie taller, denser, and fewer/reduced setbacks)
San Francisco should loosen the existing limits on height, density, and bulk for residential buildings to allow for more housing development and address the housing shortage effectively.
San Francisco Planning requires that new street-facing windows comply with City-imposed design requirements that both raise the price of windows while lowering their thermal and noise insulation. Should the City abolish these requirements?
The City should abolish these requirements to reduce construction costs and improve the energy efficiency and noise insulation of new buildings.
| In general, is it too hard, just right, or too easy to… | Too hard | Just right | Too easy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expand your home (adding new stories, rooms, decks, etc) The permitting and approval process for home expansions is often lengthy and complex, making it difficult for homeowners to make necessary modifications. | X | ||
| Renovate your home (update bathroom, kitchen, etc) Renovations, while somewhat easier than expansions, still face significant regulatory hurdles and can be delayed by lengthy approval processes. | X | ||
| Demolish your home and redevelop it into multifamily housing The process is particularly challenging due to strict zoning laws, community opposition, and extensive permitting requirements. | X | ||
| Redevelop things like parking lots and single-story commercial into multifamily housing Redevelopment projects face numerous regulatory barriers, including zoning restrictions and lengthy review processes. | X | ||
| Build subsidized housing Building subsidized housing is hindered by complex regulations, high costs, and community opposition, delaying much-needed affordable housing projects. | X | ||
| Build market-rate housing Market-rate housing development is also complicated by stringent zoning laws, high construction costs, and extensive permitting processes. | X | ||
| Build homeless shelters (including navigation centers and "tiny homes") Developing shelters and navigation centers faces significant challenges due to regulatory hurdles, community resistance, and funding issues. | X |
If you want to explain any positions above, please feel free:
Comments added in-line.
Additionally, the regulatory environment in San Francisco poses substantial challenges for various types of development and renovation projects. Streamlining these processes and reducing bureaucratic barriers could help address housing shortages and improve the overall development landscape.
Transit Infrastructure
Should Muni be free for everyone? If so, what other programs would you take money from in order to fund this change, or what new tax would you propose to fund it?
Making Muni free for everyone is an admirable goal but requires substantial funding. To achieve this, the City could reallocate funds from less essential projects and implement new revenue streams. Potential funding sources include a congestion pricing scheme, a small transit tax, public-private partnerships, federal and state grants, carbon emissions fees, and real estate development fees. Diversifying funding sources ensures sustainable financial support for the transit system, promotes equity, reduces traffic congestion, and supports environmental goals without relying solely on ridership revenue.
Some have argued that the cost of fare enforcement exceeds the benefit. Others have argued that not enforcing fare payment starves the Muni and BART systems of revenue, lowers quality of service, and makes the systems less safe. What is your position?
Fare enforcement is necessary to ensure revenue for maintaining and improving transit services. However, it should be done efficiently and fairly to avoid excessive costs and ensure equity.
Recent State funding requires Muni and BART to enforce fare payments in order to receive that funding; do you agree with this requirement?
Yes, enforcing fare payments is necessary to ensure that transit systems have the necessary revenue to operate effectively and safely. Fare enforcement helps maintain a steady revenue stream, which is crucial for the upkeep, expansion, and improvement of services. This requirement can also promote fairness, as all users contribute to the system they benefit from. However, it is important to implement fare enforcement in an equitable manner, ensuring that it does not disproportionately affect low-income riders. Exploring complementary measures, such as providing subsidies or reduced fares for those in need, can help balance revenue needs with social equity.
Should it be the policy of San Francisco to build a citywide protected bike lane network? Why or why not?
Yes, building a citywide protected bike lane network promotes safe cycling, reduces traffic congestion, and supports environmental sustainability by encouraging more people to use bikes instead of cars.
| Should San Francisco… | Yes | No |
|---|---|---|
| Do you support banning cars from central downtown areas and certain retail or residential corridors? Banning cars from central downtown areas and certain corridors can reduce traffic congestion, improve air quality, and create safer, more walkable spaces for pedestrians and cyclists. | X | |
| Do you support congestion pricing? Congestion pricing can reduce traffic, lower emissions, and generate revenue that can be reinvested into public transportation and infrastructure improvements. | X | |
| Should San Francisco prioritize buses over car traffic by creating more bus-only lanes and directing traffic enforcement officers to ticket drivers who ignore the restrictions? Prioritizing buses can improve transit efficiency, reduce travel times, and encourage more people to use public transportation, easing overall traffic congestion. | X | |
| Should Uber, Lyft, Waymo, and other ride-share services be permitted to operate in San Francisco? These services provide valuable transportation options, but they should be regulated to ensure they contribute to, rather than detract from, public transit goals and traffic management. | X | |
| Should San Francisco allow more bike share and scooter share companies? Increasing bike and scooter share options promotes sustainable transportation, reduces car dependency, and provides affordable mobility solutions for residents. | X | |
| Should San Francisco allow bike and scooter share companies to operate with fewer restrictions on the number of vehicles they offer for rent, and in more places (including inside Golden Gate Park)? Allowing these companies to operate with fewer restrictions can increase accessibility and convenience, encouraging more people to use sustainable transportation options. | X |
If you want to explain any positions above, please feel free:
Comments added in-line.
Budget
San Francisco is facing a large budget deficit due to declining tax revenues from our struggling downtown. What will your approach be to fix this?
To address San Francisco's budget deficit, I would focus on a balanced approach that includes diversifying revenue sources, supporting economic growth, and ensuring efficient spending. Streamlining regulations can attract and retain businesses of all sizes, creating economic resilience and increasing tax revenues. Additionally, conducting audits and optimizing city spending will ensure that funds are used effectively and wasteful expenditures are eliminated. Expanding public-private partnerships can also provide additional revenue. These strategies will help stabilize the budget, promote economic growth, and ensure the city can continue providing essential services to its residents.
| Do you think San Francisco spends too little, too much, or just enough on… | Too little | Just enough | Enough, but badly | Too much |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Police and public safety While the funding is significant, I believe we are not spending appropriately. We need to invest more in training, community policing, and modernizing equipment to enhance public safety and community trust effectively. | X | |||
| Street cleanliness More resources are needed to maintain clean and welcoming public spaces. | X | |||
| Homeless services While a substantial amount of money is allocated to homeless services, I believe we are not spending it effectively. We need to optimize funding to ensure it supports sustainable and impactful solutions, such as permanent housing and comprehensive support services. | X | |||
| Affordable housing Increased investment is necessary to address the housing crisis and provide more affordable options for residents. | X | |||
| Parks Current funding is adequate for maintaining parks and recreational areas. | X | |||
| Roads More investment is needed to maintain and improve infrastructure to ensure safe and efficient transportation. | X | |||
| Bus, bike, train, and other public transit infrastructure Increased investment can enhance public transit systems, making them more reliable and accessible. | X | |||
| Schools More funding is needed to ensure quality education and support for students and teachers. | X | |||
| Medical facilities Current funding is adequate for maintaining healthcare facilities. | X | |||
| Drug prevention and treatment While a significant amount is allocated to drug prevention and treatment, I believe we are not spending it effectively. More resources are needed for comprehensive programs that focus on long-term recovery and support services. | X | |||
| Arts Funding should be optimized to ensure impactful support for the arts community. | X |
If you want to explain any positions above, please feel free:
Comments added in-line.
Personal
Tell us a bit about yourself!
How long have you lived in San Francisco? What brought you here and what keeps you here?
I have lived in San Francisco since 2010 and came to the city for the same reason as so many others before me, and many to come. The vibrant culture, job opportunities, and the city's unique energy drew me here. What keeps me in San Francisco is the strong sense of community, the diverse population, the innovative spirit, and the progressive values that underpin the city's policies and culture. I am constantly inspired and motivated to contribute to the betterment of our community.
What do you love most about San Francisco?
What I love most about San Francisco is the people. The residents of this city are incredibly diverse, welcoming, and driven by a shared sense of innovation and inclusivity. San Francisco's unique blend of cultural diversity, scenic beauty, and progressive values makes it a place like no other. I often say that we are living in the future here, with the city's commitment to forward-thinking policies and groundbreaking technologies setting the pace for the rest of the world.
What do you dislike the most about San Francisco?
The high cost of living and the challenges related to housing affordability and homelessness are significant concerns that need to be addressed. These issues impact the quality of life for many residents and require comprehensive solutions to ensure that San Francisco remains a welcoming and accessible city for all.
Tell us about your current involvement in the community (e.g., volunteer groups, neighborhood associations, civic and professional organizations, etc.)
I am a long-standing weekly volunteer for the Richmond Neighborhood Center's Home-Delivered Groceries program for home-bound seniors, providing essential support and connection to vulnerable members of our community. I am actively involved in the PTA at our local public school, working with other parents and educators to better the educational experience of all children. I also volunteer regularly with the local chapter of Moms Demand Action, advocating for common-sense gun safety measures. My husband and I run a Google Group for about 100 neighbors, where we have built a platform for communication and community engagement. Just in the last two days, I spent a few hours painting over and power washing graffiti off our neighbor's home and shared sidewalk, demonstrating our commitment to maintaining a clean and welcoming neighborhood. Additionally, I have been on the steering committee for the San Francisco Bay Area Physician Assistants for the last 10 years, an 800+ local member organization. This engagement allows me to stay connected with the needs of our residents and work towards creating a better future for everyone in San Francisco.
Thank you
Thank you for giving us your time and answering our questionnaire. We look forward to reading your answers and considering your candidacy!
Thank you for the opportunity to share my vision and priorities for San Francisco. I appreciate the time and effort your organization puts into engaging with candidates and fostering informed decision-making among the electorate. I look forward to the possibility of working together to address the critical issues facing our community and to create a brighter future for all residents of San Francisco. If you have any further questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to reach out. Thank you again for considering my candidacy. -Jen
If you see any errors on this page, please let us know at contact@growsf.org.