The Board of Supervisors cut the inclusionary housing requirement from 15% to 5%, completing a fall from the 25% peak, but a Fielder amendment keeps the Mission at 8%, the highest rate in the city.

San Francisco’s Controller now recommends a 0% inclusionary housing requirement because nearly every tested housing prototype is financially infeasible under current market conditions, reviving a long-running debate over whether City Hall treats feasibility limits as ceilings or starting points.