Proposition 42 — Annotated Legal Text
Last Updated: July 14, 2026

Annotated Legal Text

San Francisco cityscape

The Retirement and Personal Savings Protection Act of 2026

Election date: November 3, 2026
Jurisdiction: California
Ballot measure number: 42
Original legal text: PDF

Read the GrowSF analysis of Prop 42 →


Section 1. Title.

This Act shall be known and may be cited as the Retirement and Personal Savings Protection Act of 2026.

Section 2. Findings and Declarations.

(a) California families are paying more for everything and we already pay some of the highest taxes in the country. A recent analysis by a non-partisan research institute concluded that California ranks 3rd worst in the nation in subjecting its population to taxes, when considering individual income taxes, sales taxes, property taxes, and other forms of taxation. California is behind only New Jersey and the District of Columbia in this regard. California also has the highest state sales tax in the nation, the highest top income tax rate, and the highest tax on gasoline, among other indicators.

(b) Every day, Californians are also facing an affordability crisis. Costs for housing, food, electricity, health care, home and auto insurance, and many other life necessities continue to escalate. Californians are struggling economically just to make ends meet on a daily basis. Saving for retirement or a rainy day is even harder. Given the state's extraordinarily high cost of living, a recent analysis suggests that Californians would need $2.3 million saved up if they want to retire comfortably for 20 years. This is an impossible sum for many Californians.

(c) To make matters worse, politicians and special interest groups want to start taxing retirement holdings, individually-owned assets, and other forms of personal savings—even though the "California Dream" is getting further out of reach for many of us and many Californians struggle to save enough money to retire. Here is just some of what could be at risk:

(1) Teachers, police officers, firefighters, and other dedicated workers earn defined-benefit pension benefits. They could be taxed on the future value of their pension benefits and forced to pay the government before they ever collect a dime in pension pay.

(2) Californians who contribute to 401(k) retirement plans and individual retirement accounts (IRAs), and invest in stocks, bonds, mutual funds, and other investments could be taxed on the value of their retirement nest eggs. This could cost workers some of their hard-earning savings, causing them to put off retirement and leaving them more economically vulnerable later in life.

(d) California already imposes income taxes, capital gains taxes, real property taxes, personal property taxes, corporation taxes, sales and use taxes, real property transaction taxes and many other taxes on its residents. In addition, once Californians begin to access their retirement holdings, sell their individually-owned assets, or realize the growth in other personal savings, they are already subject to the state's income, capital gains, and property taxes. But politicians and special interests should be prohibited from taxing the mere ownership or control of personal property such as retirement holdings, individually-owned assets, and other forms of personal savings that Californians work hard to save.

(e) Retroactive taxes can have the same devastating effects on Californians' retirement planning and personal savings. Fundamental principles of fairness in a democratic society require that individuals, families, and businesses be able to understand and rely upon the tax laws that govern their financial planning so they can make decisions with advance notice of what the rules are.

(f) The ability of Californians to organize and achieve their financial and retirement goals depends on having advance notice of the tax obligations that apply to them. Retroactive changes to tax laws are fundamentally unfair and undermine confidence in government, disrupt retirement and financial planning, and prevent residents and businesses from preparing for the future.

(g) Sacramento politicians and special interests have wasted billions of our tax dollars on inefficient and ineffective programs. But they keep coming back for more of our money with more tax proposals. They don't need to tax our retirement holdings or tax us retroactively based on past conduct, activities, or status—they need to deliver better results with what taxpayers have already given them to spend.

Section 3. Statement of Purpose.

In enacting this Act, the purpose and intent of the People of the State of California is to protect Californians' ability to save for their futures by prohibiting the imposition of new taxes on our personal property, including the ownership or control of retirement holdings, individually-owned assets, and other forms of personal savings as well as requiring all new taxes to only apply prospectively.

Section 4. Article VIII is added to the California Constitution, to read:

ARTICLE VIII

SECTION 1. Prohibition on Taxing Retirement Holdings, Individually-Owned Assets, and Other Forms of Personal Savings.

SEC. 2. Prohibition on Retroactive Taxes.

(b) Nothing in subdivision (a) shall alter or limit the imposition or collection of any tax that was in effect, imposed, and first collected on or before December 31, 2025.

SEC. 3. Definitions.

For purposes of this article, the following definitions shall apply:

SEC. 4. Application of Article.

Section 5. Conflicting Measures.

Section 6. Severability.

The provisions of this Act are severable. If any portion, section, subdivision, paragraph, clause, subclause, sentence, phrase, word, or application of this Act is for any reason held to be invalid by a decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, that decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Act. The People of the State of California hereby declare that they would have adopted this Act and each and every portion, section, subdivision, paragraph, clause, subclause, sentence, phrase, word, and application not declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether any part of this Act or application thereof would be subsequently declared invalid.

Section 7. Effective Date.

This Act shall take effect at the earliest possible date in accordance with Section 10 of Article II of the California Constitution. This Act shall become operative on the same day it takes effect.

Section 8. Liberal Construction.

This Act shall be liberally construed to give effect to its intent and purposes.

Paid for by GrowSF Voter Guide. FPPC # 1433436. Not authorized by any candidate, candidate's committee, or committee controlled by a candidate. Financial disclosures are available at sfethics.org.