Days until the
SF General Election
November 3, 2026
64 Days Until the SF General ElectionSee GrowSF's endorsements for the November election
San Francisco Proposition F — Changes to Executive Branch Management
Last Updated: August 25, 2026
San Francisco cityscape

Yes on Proposition F

Changes to Executive Branch Management

What is it?

Prop F gives the Mayor more direct control over City government, subject to oversight by the Board of Supervisors. The Mayor would gain the power to reorganize most City departments, hire and fire department heads, and remove them without a vote of the Board of Supervisors. Separately, most commissioners would serve at the pleasure of whoever appointed them, so the Mayor could remove the Mayor's own appointees at will, and the Board could remove the Board's. The measure also deletes a 1990s era ban on the Mayor hiring "deputy mayors" (akin to chiefs of staff or cabinet members) to supervise the administration of departments.

Today, most departments are written into the City Charter, so making any changes to them requires a vote of the people. Prop F would let the Mayor move duties between departments, or merge whole departments; Charter duties could move but not be eliminated. The Board could block a change within 30 days, or 60 days if an implementing ordinance is needed. Some departments would retain existing rules, including the Controller, City Administrator, Board of Appeals, Port, Airport, the Asian Art and Fine Arts Museums, and the police and sheriff oversight bodies.

Today, for most departments, an unelected commission gives the Mayor a list of at least three candidates to choose from and holds the power to fire whoever gets the job. The Police Chief is a partial exception: the Police Commission still assembles the list, but the Mayor can already remove the Chief without the Commission. F changes that for departments generally, giving the Mayor direct hire and fire authority over the heads of Planning, Building Inspection, Public Works, Homelessness and Supportive Housing, Small Business, and Entertainment. At the Municipal Transportation Agency and the Public Utilities Commission, the commission would still supply candidates, but the Mayor could remove the department head and would approve the employment contract and set the pay. Additionally, commissioners could be removed at will by whoever appointed them, rather than requiring written charges, an Ethics Commission hearing, and a three-fourths vote of the Board of Supervisors; though the Board of Appeals, Civil Service Commission, and Ethics Commission keep the current process.

Read the full annotated legal text →

Click to show fiscal impacts and more details

Fiscal impacts

According to the Controller's Office, Prop F would have a minimal impact on the cost of government, at a level that cannot be determined at this time.

Each deputy mayor would cost about $250,000 per year. The cost or savings from reorganizing departments cannot be estimated without knowing which departments are involved and how they are restructured. For comparison, when the Department of Sanitation and Streets merged back into Public Works in FY 2022-23, the Controller estimated savings of $3.5M in the first year and $2.5M in the second, from removing duplicate administrative, technology, and leadership positions along with related equipment and services.

Why is this on the ballot?

This measure qualified for the ballot by signature petition. Supporters submitted 83,224 signatures, and on July 23, 2026 the Department of Elections certified that a random sample showed more valid signatures than the 53,076 required.

Citizens may introduce charter amendments by collecting signatures from at least 10% of the registered voters in the City. The amendment must then be approved by voters with a simple majority of 50% + 1.

  • Placed on ballot by: Voter signature petition, certified by the Department of Elections on July 23, 2026
  • Proponent: Peter Leoni, per the certification letter

Why vote Yes?

When a City department fails, you expect the Mayor to fix it. But Mayor Lurie says he can hire and fire just 6% of the City's department heads, and that replacing a failing one can take six to twelve months. Most of the rest answer to unelected commissions, which pick the candidates and decide who keeps the job. The Mayor you elected can only make a recommendation.

Prop F closes that gap. The Mayor would choose department heads, reorganize departments that aren't working, and answer to you for the results. As SPUR adviser and former City Controller Ed Harrington put it, "if you want the mayor to be held responsible, you have to give them authority to make decisions."

The checks are real. The Board of Supervisors can still block any reorganization, and on police accountability the measure cuts the other way: appointing the police-accountability director moves from the Mayor to the Police Commission. Yes, this is Mayor Lurie's own measure, and it gives his office more power. It also gives you someone to hold responsible.

Vote yes on Prop F.

Paid for by GrowSF Voter Guide. FPPC # 1433436. Not authorized by any candidate, candidate's committee, or committee controlled by a candidate. Financial disclosures are available at sfethics.org.